preview

A Thesis Statement For Death Penalty

Satisfactory Essays

I. Introduction A. Startling Statement B. Some information and recent data with regards to the implementation of death penalty globally will be briefly discussed. C. Historical Background of the Death Penalty in the Philippines D. Thesis Statement II. Body A. Counterarguments 1. The death penalty deters individuals from committing crimes; therefore, the crime rates decrease. 2. As a respond to society’s demands for justice, the death penalty as a form of retribution is justified because the criminal deserves the punishment fitted to the severity of the crime he or she committed. 3. The death penalty provides a more precise legal and constitutional due process that extrajudicial killings lack. B. Own Arguments 1. Economically, the death penalty will not benefit the country in the long run. 2. The death penalty is proven to have no deterrent effect on crimes 3. The death penalty is disadvantageous and biased towards the lower class of the society. 4. The criminal justice and judicial systems in the Philippines are proven to be flawed and susceptible to mistakes. III. Conclusion A. Quotation “history will just repeat itself” B. Summary C. Restate the stand of the research paper D. Challenge the readers to think rationally and …show more content…

Moreover, 2015 has the highest number of executions recorded since 1989 that accounts to 1,634 criminals executed in the span of only a year; in fact, the data do not include China that keeps the number of executions a secret of the state. The 58 countries that continue to implement the death penalty include Japan, North Korea, Singapore, United States of America, China, and Iraq. On the other hand, the abolitionists in law and practice include Myanmar, Australia, Germany, United Kingdom, Mexico, and Philippines. (“Death

Get Access