Apply the Ethical Decision Making Method at Small Unit Level 158-C-123 Conditions: As a leader faced with a situation which requires you to make an ethical decision. Standards: Resolved the situation ethically by appropriately applying the Ethical Decision Making Method FM-1 FM 6-22 AR 600-100. Training and Evaluation Guide Performance Steps: 1. Clearly define the ethical problem. Im sure many people would consider not informing their chain of command of this situation given the circumstances(new to the unit and SFC Sharps reputation) and the fact that SFC Sharp is on his way out of the unit. However the ethical dilemma for me is, do I confront him, alert the chain of command or contact the Military Police to …show more content…
5. Commit to and implement the best ethical solution. Given all circumstances I believe that contacting the proper authorities is the best course of action. With SFC Sharp on his way out of the unit an investigation needs to be started right away before his PCS. 6. Assess results and modify plan as required. Regardless of the outcome I believe I have done the right thing 1) SGT Day and my other soldiers now know that I will not under any circumstance tolerate such things as this. 2) My actions have likely made an impact on levels higher than the 99th Inf BN such as the Brigade or Division level which could change SOP’s and make the unit more efficient and cautious 3) There is nothing to modify at this point the authorities and my chain of command are involved and the outcome lies with them. Performance Evaluation Guide Evaluation Preparation: Provide soldier with references listed below. Prepare a scenario that requires the soldier to respond accurately, IAW task standards, to the task performance measures listed above. This may be presented orally or in writing. Brief soldier: Tell soldier that he/she will be required to correctly respond on at least 70 percent of the performance measures to receive a GO the task. Performance Measures Results 1. Defined the ethical problem. GO / NO GO 2. Identified and accurately applied all
(1) The training, instruction, or correction given to a Soldier to correct deficiencies must be directly related to the deficiency. It must be oriented to improving the Soldier’s performance in his or her problem area. Corrective measures may be taken after normal duty hours. Such measures assume the nature of training or instruction, not
Accountability for personnel aids in the accessing of a unit's assets and combat readiness is called personnel strength reporting. Personnel strength reporting is a command function that enables a unit as a whole, to analyze the manning levels and readiness to provide commanders with a snapshot of the unit's combat power and capabilities. The formula to achieve a Personnel Strength report is achieved by comparing the by name data obtained during the Personnel accountability process and face it against the specified authorizations to determine the percentage of the slots filled for certain positions within a unit. Even though Strength reporting seems to be only important for the deployment process one has to think of the capabilities of each and every by name soldier within the unit, if the soldiers do not report to training how will they every be prepared for when it comes to combat situations.
Whilew on patrol I was dispatched room # 1F340, Upon arrival, I met with Hackett who stated that Veteran Susan Buggell had been sexual assault. Buggell was located in room #1F337, where I made contacted with her. Buggell stated that between 0300hrs, and 0400hrs, while at a 1211 old FM 440RD Apt #1-202 Killeen TX, 76549 she was sexually assaulted be a friend, who she identified as Anthony Williams. I asked the Buggell if she had taken a shower and she stated “no”. “I did change my clothes.” I then asked were her closed were at and she stated at her home. I asked her where she lived and she stated “810 Gary LP. Killeen, TX
We arrived at Clearview at 2231 Hrs. and took the patient to room 14. I went back outside and began to put our unit back together when Supervisor Carlock approached me and in a very agitated voice said: “WHY DID YOU PULL OFF?” Surprised, I said “What are you talking about?” He said loudly, “I TOLD YOU TO STOP AND YOU DIDN’T!” I replied, “Jeff was telling me not to stop because we had a pulse back.” He said “I DON’T CARE WHAT JEFF SAID, I’M YOUR SUPERVISOR AND I TOLD YOU TO STOP!” I said “Dennis, I think you’re talking to the wrong person, you need to be talking to Jeff, I was doing what he told me to do.” He replied “WHO’S YOUR SUPERVISOR, WHO’S YOUR SUPERVISOR, I AM, NOT JEFF, YOU DO WHAT I SAY!” I said ”yes, you are the supervisor, but at that moment I was doing what the Paramedic in charge of patient care was telling me to do, and what I felt was best for the Pt., since we had a 41 Y/O patient who had a pulse.” He said “I DON’T CARE, YOU DO WHAT I SAY!
If the highest ranking officer had worded his phrase a little differently then I think all of this could have been avoided. Personally I felt that their communication between each other cut off somewhere for this event to arise.
Sergeant Scocca called the Command Center and reported that an anonymous caller who claimed to be a Confidential Informant by the name of "AMILE" alleged that police officers were demanding money an exchange not raid 726 Willoughby Ave, which is a drug prone location. Numerous investigative steps were take n in an effort to identify the caller, but we were unsuccessful. Surveillances at the location yielded negative results for any Member of Service visiting or associating with the above location. A search warrant was conducted and no MOS were present, but an active Member of New York City Department of Correction mini shield was recovered among a pound of marijuana. After a thorough investigation and the fact that we have no evidence to suggest
I was chosen to participate in multiple echelon field exercises allowing me to see first hand the level of planning and coordination that goes into such exercises and has afforded me the knowledge of how to appropriately extrapolate intelligence requirements from Battalion, Brigade,
My course of action would be to approach SFC Sharp on the matter. By going to him first I would be giving him the "benefit of the doubt." I feel I would be seeking to correct the problem as if I was going to be the recipient of consequences for these actions and would be resolving the problem at the lowest level possible. All three of the approaches to ethical thought (obligation, consequences, and character) are involved in this
Today’s task is to conduct 4 For the Core, Military Movement Drills 1 & 2, and Hill Repeats. IAW TC 3-22.20.
Candidate Anrig briefed a very detailed Situation paragraph, including an enemy situation based on TSUALE and DRAWD concepts, as well as the Company’s mission statement. Admin & Logistics and Command and Signal Paragraphs were concise and included relevant details about MedEvac and EPW plans that went beyond what most candidates briefed. SNC’s mission statement showed a consistent understanding of a task and a purpose. However, SNC failed to identify any Tactical Control Measures in his order, though his tasking statements were clear and detailed. SNC’s detailed understanding of the five paragraph order was unfortunately over shadowed by frequent stumbling, use of filler words, and little eye contact. During execution, SNC had a difficult time
the PM with trivial matters.” I cannot stress it enough – Soldiers’ concerns are why we are here! Please
Military has the strictest form of evaluating stuff and especially cadet’s performance as a team. Working together is essential to complete assignments within the military. For this reason this is the control group of the research, which is a very appropriate group, with an appropriate number of participants.
a. Use knowledge gained from self-development courses and experience to conduct a 90% review of all course material instructed by you each quarter and provide input on course successes and shortcomings from your perspective to the Army Liaison Office every quarter at least one week prior to the Battalion 's Quarterly Training Board and or Cryptologic Training Advisory Group session.
The recruit is to be rated on all area listed in the 23 Performance Categories. Comments are required to be detail and summarize the recruit’s performance in these areas for the entire week. The recruit will be evaluated to meet met standards in all areas and released to solo capable duties. The following definitions shall be used when rating the recruit in each performance category:
After researching the situation at ECMC, I failed to locate details about the perpetrator. It was revealed that they notified law enforcement