Athletes And Entertainers Should Be Paid

In 2012, the NCAA earned $871.6 million in revenue (Dirlam), but it is never distributed to the workforce. As it stands, the NCAA forbids college athletes from earning any compensation from participation in college athletics. Scandals surrounding high-profile college football stars who accepted payment for providing autographs have brought to light what is wrong with NCAA policy. Athletes from college football and men’s basketball deserve a piece of the $871.6 million revenue pie. These sports athletes occupy a different role on campus, the role of an employee as well as a student that female and other male athletes do not. Paying athletes’ a full salary for their participation is an extreme solution. Instead, the NCAA can solve the

Although Athletes entertain us all and provide us with something to look forward to, their paychecks are too big for what they do. There are millions of people who are injured in the military or have illnesses that need that money to help them recover ,but instead we give the money to people who entertain us.

Corruption, scandals, suspensions, firings and a systems that is systematically flawed all the while the fact of the matter is that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a organization that is bringing in billions of dollars each year yet the labor force generating the money gets a scholarship that many athletes believe doesn’t pay enough for everything that is needed on campus so this leads the author to have to take a look at if athletes need to be paid. I will outline numerous problems that are going on in college athletics and possible solutions to problems. I will take a look at the scholarship itself

The idea of paying players in college sports has been around since they have started. People have different opinions on if they should or should not be paid and through their tone, experience, and how they use their information to see if these athletes should get paid. Jay Bilas a sport broadcaster with years of experience believes that in this billion dollar industry the only people not getting paid are the ones, people pay to see and he also believes athletes would stay in school longer. While on the other hand Kieran McCauley believes that even though they shouldn’t be paid they could be compensated and that school isn’t a place to get paid it’s a place to learn and get a jumpstart into the real world. They are both similar with who their audience and who the way they approach the topic looking for the betterment of

Football is an extremely rough sport; according to Sportsters.com, “football players put their life on the the line every day as they risk life threatening injuries such as concussions, broken limbs, heart-attacks, paralyzation and even death.” Another interesting point is that colleges and college coaches earn millions of dollars on the backs of the athletes while the players themselves are not authorized to receive one dime for their work. Therefore, if teenage athletes take such life threatening risks on a daily basis, they should at least earn a paycheck while doing so, and if the coaches and colleges

First, America has a wide variety of different career paths to follow, and one of those most well-known categories is Professional Sports. I’m sure you’ve heard of the NFL (National Football League), or the MLB (Major League Baseball). Those are some of the few Professional Sports organizations in America today. These organizations pay athletes to play and entertain

The question of should student athletes get paid is an argument that is growing in debate in recent years. Mostly pertaining to college Football and Basketball. Especially when the revenue generated from these sports rival those of its professional counterparts. Some would argue that receiving a full athletic scholarship is payment enough. Or, student athletes are no different from any college student working their way through college. However, these student athletes are not guaranteed full scholarships and deal mostly the same pressures of athletes that make their living playing these sports.

$29 million, to do half the work that someone with the same occupation as you. Doing half the work should probably mean half the normal pay, but it 's not. Being paid $29 million for any type of work should probably involve running the most prestigious company in the world, or being the first to find the cure for cancer. Not even close. Imagine being paid $29 million to play baseball, and not even the whole season. Welcome to the life of Alex Rodriguez. Alex Rodriguez 's salary in 2013 was $4 million more than the whole Houston Astros roster, making him the highest paid baseball player for the 13th consecutive season (Blum). Although the talent of professional athlete or professional teams should be rewarded through their salaries, there

How sport is presented and supported today can mean total success or deep failure tomorrow. Every year the government of Canada provides money for athletics through three programs all of which add up to around $256 million, but that is only going towards the athletes, not even the facilities. The average cost to build a new professional facility is $6 billion, and to build a simple recreational center it costs $5.7 million. Contractors and businessmen set budgets before building anything new but the budgets always rise; regions get no economic boost from spending money on tickets and building projects and spectators are becoming uninterested in watching live games. The government should not use taxpayer dollars to support athletes and build

The bulk of the Free Agency period in the NFL has wrapped up. Many of these athletes signed lucrative multimillion dollar contracts. Nate Solder, a guard for the New York Giants, signed a contract worth $62 million over four years with 34.8 million guaranteed (Nate Solider). For some in the football world this seems like a great investment while for others outside of football it seems like an overpay. These individuals might think that paying someone $62 million to play football is outrageous, but in reality, most of them deserve every penny of it because they are irreplaceable, increase the economy around the area and distribute money from owners.

I believe that people that play sports in college should be paid because people in college struggle a lot for their living expenses. It is very hard in college to pay for tuition, living expenses, etc. People say that some nights they go hungry without food. I believe that it isn't fair for hard working athletes that risk getting injured to not get paid for their sports. Sport athletes should get paid more for their time in athletics because they are the reason colleges get money from the tickets and merchandise.

Sweaty body, aching muscles, and uniforms. This is the daily life of an athlete. These incredible students devote their time and energy to entertaining their university and the entire country. The question is though, should, or should they not be paid? Athletes should not be payed to play; however, some say they should because the sport takes up so much of their time. In contrast, athletes on scholarship already receive a completely free college education; and others say athletes should not be payed to play because they receive free education from the University they attend.

Money is flooding into these athletic departments and the athletes benefit in many ways, but do athletes deserve to be paid for what? Most people think they shouldn’t be paid because where would they get the money from. Athletes should be paid for what they do because it could keep them in school.

Athletes and entertainers deserve large sums of money because being an athlete is physically and mentally challenging. An entertainer on the other hand costs a lot of money to start off. These two high paying jobs their similarities and differences. For example, both of these jobs take a lot of time and effort. One of the differences is that they do very different things.

In the recent decades, sports celebrities have a huge earning and their salary is far more than other professors in other field such as scientist and surgeon. Some people believe that is completely justified while critics maintain that is unfair. This essay will discuss both views and provide my perspective.