Essay about Coaching and Mentor

From the vantage point of the present, it is easy to look back at the tenure of any great leader and draw conclusions about just what it was that made him/her great. We can examine the circumstances under which their leadership flourished; piece together what we know of their character and personality traits; delve into the factors that may have driven them; and dissect their leadership style all in an effort to pinpoint the source of their success. The ‘Great Man’ theory, popular in the 19th century and now thoroughly debunked, held that leaders are born, not made; suggesting that men like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., and Winston Churchill were born with the innate capacity to change the world (Landis,

I will discuss how Marshall can improve on his management style by discussing three different types of management; Maslow hierarchy style, McGregor’s theory x and y, and lastly the Blake and Moutons managerial grid.

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.

There are number of different leadership styles available in different organizations according to its environment. such as,

The essay classifies leadership into four key approaches: (1) trait approach, (2) behaviour approach, (3) the

Early on in the study of leadership, it was believed that people were born with specific traits that made them great leaders. In other words, early

Many have argued that due to the lifespan of this theory it has not gained enough research into it and as a result it seen as being less credible than the Trait theory approach, therefor not giving an effect answer as to whether leaders are born or made.

To see how leadership theories have evolved I have noted some fundamental changes between the great man theory and conscious leadership. The great man leadership theory states that the ability to lead is inherited and cannot be developed. The assumption is that leaders will arise when there is a need for them to. In contrast conscious leaders come from a diverse background. From the very

According to Hersey and Blanchad, there are basically four main leadership styles along with the letter-number

Leaders are never solely judged by their results; Leaders’ personality traits are always a factor. Some leadership researches believe every leader has certain personality traits that determine leadership effectiveness. Currie does not believe in this leadership trait theory. DuBrin summaries this theory as leaders having the

The Great Man Theory of leadership dates back to the early 1900s where it was strongly believed that great leaders are born, not made. The basic premise of this theory has been contested since the inception of leadership study. While recent studies show some evidence to the contrary, the fundamental principle of the theory does retain some validity. The historian Thomas Carlyle coined the Great Man Theory as he argues the world’s history is simply a collection of biographies belonging to great men (U, 2016). Although referred to as the Great Man Theory, the foundation of the theory is gender neutral. It has more recently been termed the Great Man/Great Woman Theory of leadership, removing the gender associated bias. The lack of

Research compounded by Daniel Goleman concluded that there are six styles of leadership. Each style being a reflection of the leader’s emotional intelligence. Goleman (2009) refers to

This report will focus on analysis of the leader, the follower, and the situation and how the interplay relates to Mr. S. It will explore his Communication, Ethics and Values, and take a three dimensional view of his Intelligence. It will also study his Leadership traits and how he employs his power and influence.

According to (Benis, 2014) the most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born—that there is a genetic factor to leadership. Author (John F. Kennedy) observed that Leadership learning is indispensable to each other, leader learning how to become leaders and they are continuing to learn in their own role as leaders. In fact, there are several theoretical approaches have been conducted to determine the impact of the leadership. In this essay the impact of these approaches and understanding of their main tasks will be discussed. In the end of this essay Leadership Questionnaire (Donald Clark) will be