Chapter 6: The Duel for North America
1. Why was the French Empire ultimately so much less successful than either the Spanish or the British Empires?
The French were less successful then both the Spanish and the British because they were late to jump to the gun on the race to claim land in the new world, by time the French stared colonizing the new world the British had already settled on the east coast, and the Spanish in south America, so basically they had to take what is now known as Canada by default, because that is all that was left.
2. If France, instead of Britain, had won the “duel for North America,” would the thirteen colonies ever have become independent of Britain, or would they have been forced to stay within the
…show more content…
3. Were all the American grievances really justified, or were the British actually being more reasonable than most Americans have traditionally believed? Yes, they were justifiable, America was getting protection and a steady business partner, furthering their economic boom, when Britain put the taxes on American products, America had over reacted a bit, it was a small increase in the price of goods, but it was enough to cause hoopla over.
4. What was the Revolutionary movement, at its core, really all about? Was it about the amount of taxation, the right of Parliament to tax, the political corruption of Britain and the virtue of America, the right of a king to govern America, or the colonies’ growing sense of national identity apart from Britain? Was the Revolution truly a radical overturning of government and society—the usual definition of a revolution—or something far more limited or even conservative in its defense of traditional rights?
The American Revolution was about America wanting to secede from Britain, to govern themselves as a new union, the United States of America, it would negate any ties they had to Britain and would solve the taxation without representation, No, the American Revolution was not a radical overturn of government, it was America fighting for their freedom of Britain so they could be one union instead of always referred to as the colonies, to get rid of the relentless taxes that were being
In 1763, the French and Indian War ended, leaving Great Britain with large debts. In order to help with the debt, Great Britain passed laws to tax the colonists. The colonists were furious. Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain? Yes, the American colonists were justified in waging war to break away from Britain because the British Parliament was over taxing the colonists, the colonists were forced to stay on the East side of the Appalachian Mountains, and they had to pay to house and care for British soldiers.
Under the British rule American’s god given rights were taken from. As well as many unlawful taxes were imposed upon them. The British put into
Were all the American grievances really justified, or were the British actually being more reasonable than most Americans have traditionally believed?
B. It was also called the French and Indian War by the New England Colonies.
The Acts, unreasonable taxes, and total unjustness; but all for what? these were all things forced upon the colonists by Britain. This would eventually lead to something bigger….The American Revolution. Did the colonists have the right to declare war on England because of how they were treated? I think the colonists were justified in breaking away from Britain because lack of land, British occupation / no freedom, and too much taxing.
During the 17th century, the French and Native allies inflicted monumental defeats against England. At the same time, New France was rapidly expanded into areas of land stretching down South towards Louisiana. As Settlements began to prosper, Great Britain viewed this growth as a threat to their position in North American trade, which was the linchpin to war with New France. Through years of industrious and unwearying battle, The French fought unwaveringly to defend their colony. Unfortunately, they fell short and lost every installment, one by one. This can be attributed to many issues of New France during this time. The battle between France and England was a major catalyst for struggles that preceded and eventually led to the fall of New
Leading up to the American Revolution, were a chain of events that created a spark in the colonists to obtain independence from Great Britain. The American Revolution could not be tied to one single event but instead by the feelings and determination brought on by this chain of disgraceful actions. Gordon S. Wood explains what he believes caused the rebellion of the American colonists from Great Britain and how those causes help explain the outcomes of the revolution in his essay, “Radical Possibilities of the American Revolution.” Wood argues that the colonists were motivated to rebel against the British monarchy due to their need to preserve their liberties and through this revolution a radical change in government and American life occurred.
However as the Articles of Capitulation indicated the period of stability for New France had political and economic problems. With a higher and stable population, French goods and access to tradable goods; furs, pelts and natural resources produced an economic rivalry between the English. As the economic rivalry increased, it began to cause friction in their political relations. Gradually, Franco-Anglo relations began to encompass territorial supremacy of the North American region. Interestingly, the geopolitical situation during the early 18th century displayed English territory along the Atlantic seaboard and in Rupert 's Land, while France’s territory concentrated in the centre of North America.
The reason England won the struggle to control the North American continent is because they had a strong military and had a plan set out for when they colonized in America. At first they had a very weak military, but when they beat the undefeatable Spanish Armanda, they’re military strength increased. At that time, the Spanish were one of strongest nations in the world and in the early 1600’s, their economy started to suffer when they started to overexert their army. That’s when England economy started to become stronger. They were more focused on expanding their land and gaining more profit. The British main goal was to colonize the North American continent, and the French and Spanish didn’t really focus on colonizing North America, but to
Based on various sources, one can conclude that the American Revolution was inevitable, as well as foreseeable. Acts established by the colonies and Great Britain were plentiful, and also forgotten. The effort that the British ‘regulars’ put into making the colonies follow these Acts was only a waste of their time.
Many countries were involved with shaping North America into what it is today, but three significant nations, Spain, England, and France, are the real reason why the Americas are so successful. The Spanish came first with Christopher Columbus leading the way in 1492, then came the British in 1607 generating Jamestown, and bringing up the rear was the French in 1608 colonizing Quebec. The three countries had very different goals and reasons for coming to the Americas and they also ended up in dissimilar areas, so their experiences were all unalike but very similar at the same time. The Spanish originally longed for new, western routes to the Indies, but ended up staying in North America for the economic properties. The English wanted freedom
There has been much debate about whether the Revolutionary War was a rebellion or a revolution. Whereas a rebellion is defined as an act of defiance against authority, a revolution connotes a more comprehensive change, a compete replacement of power. In terms of the American Revolution, the question roughly translates to whether it was simply a switch of power or a complete change in the form of government. I believe that the American Revolution was indeed a revolution and not simply a rebellion because of the political, economic, and social changes that followed.
As a result of what treaty did the French lose their colony in North America to the British?
When the conflict between the American colonists and Britain is summarized in one sentence, any person would agree that the colonists were completely justified in revolting against Britain. After more than a century of self-rule in the American colonies, Britain had the audacity to barge in and hand down taxes to every colonist to benefit itself, a country located at the other end of the Atlantic Ocean. Britain clearly seems like the enemy in this retelling, but taking an objective view on the subject uncovers a number of reasons why the contrary is true. Britain was a benign mother country that was justified in taxing the colonies because Britain treated the colonies
The unstable relationship between the British and their allies, the colonist/Native, implying the difficulties of communication which can lead to many conflicst that make it harder to win against the French's positive relatiionship with their allies. On the assumption that the French defeats the British, thus the Colonist/Native will have a better