preview

Ethical Dilemmas In My Sister's Keeper

Decent Essays

A trolley is running out of control down a track. In its path are five people who have been tied to the track by a madman. Fortunately, you could flip a switch, which will lead the trolley down a different track to safety. Unfortunately, there is a single person tied to that track. Should you flip the switch or do nothing? Popular ethical dilemmas like this have been commonplace in debates, films, and even novels for generations. “My Sister’s Keeper” has many themes throughout its story, including; sisterhood, family, and concealing emotions. Though, the most explicit theme in the book, (and of the character Anna in particular) is that of the aforementioned dilemma. The ever-shifting line between right and wrong, and what’s ethical, and what’s …show more content…

When everything goes to hell, the people who stand by you without flinching - they are your family.” Jim Butcher. Leukemia is only one infinitesimal note on an ever-expanding list of things that have the capability to tear a family apart. Nevertheless, the origin of (almost) all conflicts in the novel stem from Sara’s decision to treat Kate’s leukemia by having Anna as a “designer baby”. Sara’s choice is justifiably comparable to the “trolley dilemma”, where the answer is seemingly obvious. That is, that she is most likely saving the life of one with dramatically less of a sacrifice (a minor operation) on another’s life. Although, it could be argued that the fact that Sara had Anna for the sole purpose (a sub argument could be whether or not Sara and Brian wanted another child for other reasons or not) of saving Kate is immoral. Arguments (and sub arguments) aside, the initial moral conflict of Sara’s decision is the “cause” of Anna. Then, like the first domino, Anna sets off all other conflicts in their own winding paths: the unstable family, hidden motifs and emotions, and testing the bonds of sisterhood. In spite of that, there are some conflicts that could not be resulted from Anna’s destructive …show more content…

From the beginning of the book, Kate is seen as sort of a victimized character. A person you only see through the scope of others, and you can simply judge as the “tough as nails/keeps on smiling/fun, caring sister” leukemia patient. Though, just when the reader is thinking the twists in the novel couldn’t get any more trite or predictable (another arguable point(I swear this is the last one)), cancer-stricken Kate throws said reader a curveball. Towards the end of the story, Anna reveals to the reader, that in a conversation she and Kate had, Kate admitted that she had no desire to live and had attempted suicide. This revelation, of course, changes the way the reader sees Kate, and realizes with more sympathy, the reasons for Anna’s seemingly selfish decision. Anybody can agree that Kate has every right to die if she wants, and It’s easily imagined how Anna felt about this and tested the two sister’s relationship. When the court rules in favor of Anna, she seems slightly confused on what she should do. The judge himself stated that “morals are more important than ethics”, but that Anna has every right to decide what’s right for her body. Despite her long moral and ethical battle, Anna’s efforts were all for naught, as the book throws another slimy curveball. Anna gets into a car accident, swiftly after leaving the trial, and is left good-as-dead. When she is determined legally

Get Access