Evaluation of culture background of Germany, Japan, and Ireland through Hofstede Cultural Dimension As professor Geert Hofstede put, "Culture is more often a source of conflict than of synergy. Cultural differences are a nuisance at best and often a disaster." Therefore, understanding different cultures in different countries is a significant issue for multinational enterprises, especially for the inevitable trend of globalization. As our project aims at analyzing the international expansion of German, Japanese, and Irish enterprises, I would like to depict the culture background of these three countries through the method of Hofstede Culture Dimensions. First of all, I want to introduce the Hofstede Cultural Dimensions briefly. This …show more content…
They would examine every link or segment very carefully. Traditionally, Germans held a strong view towards authoritarianism, which is a form of social control characterized by strict obedience to the authority of a state or organization and is strongly hierarchical. (internationalbusiness.wikia, 2011) People from U.S. might find that the German relationship of managers and common employees cold and distant, which is because that people prefer to socialize with peer group. Nowadays, an increasingly number of women are making their ways into more and more important position in many Germany companies. However the ratio of women in the business field is still fairly low compared with many other European countries. This might due to the situation that people at the senior position in German companies are usually engineers, but there is a lack of women studying this kind of majors. Additionally, Germans have low tolerance of uncertainty. They do not like surprises. Sudden changes in business transactions, even if they may improve the outcome, are unwelcome. (www.cyborlink.com/besite/germany.htm, 2011) They prefer to follow the same format and abbey the rules strictly. This might be regarded as being excessively inflexible. However, it is also the reason why Germans can make products with extremely high quality. ( geert-hostede.com, 2003) As for Japan, some of the culture dimension figures are quite similar to Germany, but others are different.
Some similarities between America and Germany are both America and Germany are individualistic societies. “Individualistic societies are when you give priority to personal goals rather than the group; emphasizing values that serve the self, such as feeling good, obtaining personal distinction through achievement, and preserving independence”
The first and most important cultural difference between Americans and Germans is the issue of self-control and regulations. Many Americans are impulsive and make decisions without much thought behind their actions. Germans, as opposed to Americans, are much less susceptible for impulsive actions because in Germany there are significantly more rules and social norms for Germans to follow which are part of Ordnung. The reason why Germans have more social norms and rules than Americans is to prevent misunderstandings that may be taken as disrespect. Germans “feel comfortable with these kinds of rules, which give them a feeling of security as well as a strong sense of right and wrong” (Nees 39). The amount of rules and regulations that are in Germany might make an American
While Germany and America are similar in some aspects, there is a very stark division between them when it comes to different social and cultural
According to Maxeiner (2012); their area unit two principal objectives of criminal justice, to set up the difficulty for effective decision-making and therefore the ability to come to a decision. These a number of the cited as a number of the most things that show however Germany 's criminal justice system contrasts with the America 's criminal justice system. supported this; this essay are going to be comparison at a number of the basic variations between America’s and Germany’s scheme (Maxeiner, 2012). For instance; it 's clear that America 's judges square measure arguably disemboweled and second prosecution and police agencies is on the state level and not native level. America 's criminal justice acts on the class-conscious system and in contrast to America, Germany 's functionary square measure continually an official. Germany 's criminal procedure operates on one code and is more unified compared to America (Maxeiner, 2012). distinction between America and Deutschland’s Substantive Law one among the most variations between the Yankee and German criminal justice is that since America embraces death penalty; there 's none in Germany (Maxeiner, 2012). Germany 's sentences square measure much deemed lower compared to America, and this is often by the distinction in decision-making by judges from these nations. For example; each countries use police and prosecutors to analyze and gift a case before the court (Maxeiner, 2012). On the contrary; the excellence comes once the
In one article I read a German citizen came to America for some time to work. He tells of the differences he noticed between the two countries business styles. He tells of how the company he worked for in Germany wanted to hire more women and how their efforts did not succeed. A colleague of his told their boss exactly why their efforts did not succeed and that they had not tried everything they could have.
There is a difference seen between Americans and Germans in the way politics are viewed. Considering the rough past with political leaders that Germany has endured, they have a reason to view it differently. This could also be attributed to building up a country that has lost everything. Germany is a country that has seen many trials and tribulations, to get to where they are. Therefore, they have many different tendencies than other countries. For Germans, they have a sense of verbindlich that is related to politics on a large scale.
They are very high on the monochromic scale and their consensus and decision-making process is often more deliberate then Americans.becouse Germans approach decision making slowly and laboliorisly,while most Americans think nothing a changing plans at the last minute. The Germans want to know where there expected visitors are at all times. in General Germans provide much more information than most people from other cultures. They also like facts, figures and examples. Give them all information that you have and you can take more. They certainly do not expect to see them smiling a lot. But they are not unfriendly. Their society is much homogeneous than American society and all rules –legal, informal or formal are
There are significant cultural differences between Japan and the United Kingdom that need to be taken into account when doing international business. There are also a number of methods and systems by which these differences have been described. These include the Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions, Trompenaars seven dimensions of culture and the Globe Project's cultural dimensions. This paper will discuss these differences and similarities, and shed light as to the best approach to international business in these countries.
It is this gap in cultural understanding and increase in globalization that makes cultural models, such as Hofstede’s, that much more important to learn and apply during business relations. Many companies that try to expand beyond their current borders end up failing due to refusing to recognize the differences between cultures. An American company that expands into foreign markets, yet tries to run their operations and marketing as they would in America, is going to have a difficult time. Products and well as company practices need to be adapted to suit the country’s business culture, current market climate, taste/preferences of the citizens, etc.
This paper provided an opportunity to take a deeper look into the country of Japan by conducting a Global Cultural Analysis. Throughout this paper the following four research areas were explored: 1.What is the major elements and dimensions of culture in Japan? 2. How are these elements and dimensions integrated by locals conducting business in Japan? 3. How does U.S. culture and business compare with the elements and dimensions of culture integrated by the locals conducting business in Japan? 4. What are the implications for U.S. businesses that wish to conduct business with Japan?
The problems arise mainly because the CEO of the Spanish company made his decisions of expansion in Germany on a blue-eyed approach. The idea occur to him when meeting German tourists in Spain that were relax and happy without taking into account that the East Germans were not allowed to travel so far and there are important differences between the mentality of Western and Eastern Germany.
With the unstoppable trend of globalisation, it becomes extremely significant for international businesses to have a thorough understanding of different cultures. Hofstede (1980, pp. 21-23) defines culture as ‘the collective programming of the mind distinguishing the members of one group or category of people from another’. This essay examines Hofstede’s cultural framework and suggests that Hofstede’s cultural framework is an outstanding and authoritative tool to analyze culture differences. In this essay, cultural frameworks will be discussed firstly, following by a discussion of my cultural scores and background. Finally, recommendations on cross-cultural management between China and Australia will be provided.
When a business decides to venture internationally into different countries with its products, services, and operations, it is very important that the company gains an understanding of how the culture of the different societies affects the values found in those societies. Geert Hofstede conducted one of the most famous and most used studies on how culture relates to values. Hofstede study enabled him to compare dimensions of culture across 40 countries. He originally isolated four dimensions of what he claimed summarized different cultures — power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, and masculinity versus femininity (Hill, 2013, p.110). To cover aspects of values not discussed in the original paradigm Hofstede has since added two more dimensions — Confucianism or long-term orientation and indulgence versus self-restraint (Hofstede, n.d.). Because of the way Hofstede’s cultural dimensions are given an index score from 0-100, it is easy for a company to get a general comparison between the cultures they are expanding into and the culture they are already in.
The United States and China boast the two largest economies in the world but, despite this fact, these two countries have very little in common. At first glance, this may seem very obvious to most people but, what exactly is it that makes these two countries so different? How is it that such different perspectives and approaches can both lead to great success? Hofstede’s six dimensions of culture are an attempt to answer these questions and more. Dr. Geert Hofstede, studied employees of the computer firm IBM in over fifty different countries. When he examined his findings he found “clear patterns of similarity and difference along the four dimensions” (Manktelow, Jackson Edwards, Eyre, Cook and Khan, n.d.). The fact that he focused his research on solely IBM employees allowed him to eliminate company culture as a differentiating factor and “attribute those patterns to national and social differences” (n.d.). He used his findings to originally identify four dimensions, later expanded to six, that could “distinguish one culture from another” (n.d.). The six dimensions all on a scale from 0 to 100 are:
Generally speaking, however, the populations of both Germany and Japan are more aware of the rest of the world than is true in the United States. Insularity in Germany and Japan stems not from the ignorance of the world found in the United States, but rather from a desire to avoid societal pollution. The German and Japanese governments are also less interventionist internationally than is the United States government, and, thus, more in tune with societal preferences.