Fdi Essay

Tarun Kanti Bose (Corresponding author) Assistant Professor, Business Administration Discipline, Khulna University Khulna 9208, Bangladesh Tel: 880-1911-451-044 Received: February 25, 2012 doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n5p164 Abstract This study was directed towards detecting the positive and negative sides for the foreign investors while they go for direct investment in India and China. A descriptive and explorative research study has been carried out for investigating the current proposition of the concerned case of FDI in those two countries. Advantages of investing in India includes-Huge market size and a

With an advent of the New Economic Policy (NEP) reforms, Chand (n.d) states that FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was abandoned and FEMA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) was enacted. Due to this there were huge number of Multinational Companies (MNC’s) entering the Indian market. Industries of high technology and high investment priority were provided automatic permission of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) up to 51% of

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is taken as one of the key factor of rapid economic growth and development. FDI, it is believed to stimulate domestic investment, human capital, and transfers technology. It is associated qualities which causes the faster economic development in the host countries. South Korea, for instance had one of the of the poorest economies during 1960s, but yet

The world is becoming a global village from the rapid introduction of technology; there should be a need to understand the relationship between foreign investors and the economy. Foreign investors and its impact on the economic growth of a country cannot be over emphasized. A way by which it affects the economy is through the foreign direct investment. Foreign direct investment is defined not only as the transfer of money, but also a mixture of financial and intangible assets such as technology, managerial capability, marketing skills, and other assets (Nahide & Badri, 2014). In various economies they have regulations guiding the actions of foreign investors, but their impact are still felt on the economy, especially the developing countries. It assists in creating employment opportunities as well as improving the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the economy. Recently, there has been an increased attention to foreign direct investment; this proves the fact that it’s seen as the main factor of economic growth (Camelia, 2013). Despite the barrier to foreign investment, it has a positive impact on the economic growth of a country.

FDI in Services In 2000, share of FDI in services to total FDI inflows in India was just 1.8% and afterwards it grew steadily to reach a record all-time high of 34.7% during 2006 but declined afterwards. Of the cumulative FDI in services during 2000-2010, financial services accounted for bulk of the inflows (41.7%) followed by banking services (9.6%), and both non-financial services and R&D sharing 9.5% each (Table 1). Share of financial services,

A developing country is usually characterized by low savings, low capital, stock and low investment. Such a country looks for external source to bridge its resources gap. Hence, FDI is encouraged. The LDC’s also often receive technology, work culture and advanced managerial techniques along with FDI. In view of the immense benefits of FDI the LDC’s produce suitable policy environment to attract them.

During the last three decades, the world economy has increasingly integrated with foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI itself has become a particularly significant driving force

In order to meet the objectives of the study to analyses the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Indian Economy, annual data have been collected from 2007-2016. However to make analysis between financial performance of FDI based Companies and Non FDI based Companies listed at BSE for 10 years has been considered. This study is based on secondary data. The required data have been collected from CMIE Prowess IQ data base.The tools used in the study are panel data Fixed Effect Model, Random Effect Model, Hausman test and Chow test. The sample size is selected on the basis of FDI definition given by IMF i.e. if foreign shareholding is 10% or more than 10% in the company that company will be considered as FDI based

Duttaray, Dutt and Mukhopadhyay (2008) examined the causality between FDI and economic growth for 66 developing Countries, taking into account their interaction with exports and technological change and they also conducted time series analysis which is for testing Granger causality in the presence of non stationary time series for each Country and the main findings of this article are that FDI causes growth in several developing Countries but the mechanism through which this works differs across Countries and reverse causality from growth to FDI exists for many Countries. All data used was

At the conclusion of this report, I will try to show whether there is a relationship between India’s Foreign Corporate Tax Rate and India’s Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Through my research, we see that India’s foreign corporate tax rate affects its FDI negatively. The time period we will be looking at will be from 1997-2013, due to the limited data available. Furthermore, I will explore some policy improvements which may increase FDI in India.

A Foreign Direct Investment is basically an ownership in a business in a country by a totally different country. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a very important role in the development of a nation. All countries need FDI’s but in the case of underdeveloped or developing nations FDI is one of the most important aspect, as this kind of investment is required to help sustain the growth of the economy. This inturn helps improving the balance of payments and also helps in generating employment in the country. FDI also helps to improve productivity and use the available resourecs to the maximum.

Arguments supporting FDI in developing countries suggest that recipient countries need to fulfill some preconditions to create a favorable business environment. It has certain advantages to both the host country and the investor. Host countries’ macroeconomic policy, tax regime, regulatory practices are critical determinants for attracting FDI.

In Indian context, the importance of FDI was realized way back in 1948 when emphasis was given on creating domestic base. However, since access to finance was quite limited, the attitude towards FDI was receptive (Kumar, 2004). Since then there was a debate over the necessity of FDI and Government of India in the 1980s cautiously went on deregulation of industries. However, after the adoption of liberal investment policy under economic reforms in 1991 resulted in attraction of more FDI inflow to the country. In recent times, FDI inflow to India increased by 17.1 percent in 2005, which is 5.8 percent of GDP of the country.

Foreign direct investment (“FDI”) in India is regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 (“FEMA”). The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (“DIPP”), Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India makes policy pronouncements on FDI through Press Notes and Press Releases which are notified by the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) as amendments to Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by Persons Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000.

After getting independence in 1947, the government of India envisioned a socialist approach based on the USSR system to developing the country’s economy. The last decade of the 20th century witnessed a drastic increase in foreign direct investment (FDI), accompanied by a marked change in the attitude of most developing countries towards inward investment. FDI flows have grown in importance relative to other forms of international capital flows, and the resulting production has increased as a share of world output.. FDI in India has in a lot of ways enabled India to achieve a certain degree of financial stability, growth and development during recession. This money has allowed India to focus on the areas that may have needed economic attention and address various problems that continue to challenge the country. The factors that attracted investment in India are stable economic policies, availability of cheap and quality human resources, and opportunities of new unexplored markets. Mostly FDI are flowing in service sector and manufacturing sector recorded very low investments. The investments in service sector enhanced the benefit of flow of funds to the home country. Presently India is contributing about 17% of