Essay about Financials On Coke Vs Pepsi

1. Using the current ratio, discuss what conclusions you can make about each company’s ability to pay current liabilities (debt).

An official financial analysis for a specific company needs two years of financial data from the company and from a competitor in the same industry. This financial analysis is between PepsiCo, Inc. and Coca-Cola. Pepsi and Coca-Cola dominate the beverage market worldwide. In addition to sodas, they also distribute a variety of water and energy drinks. Based on the analysis, the investor will be able to make a better investment choice.

However, no matter what the advertisements claim, the statistics concerning the shares and value of each company cannot lie. The Coca-Cola Company dominates the soft-drink market by owning four of the global top five soft-drink brands, which include Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta, and Sprite. The Coca-Cola Company makes or licenses more than 400 drink products in more than 200 nations. In 2006, Coca Cola’s sales reached 24,088 million dollars and had a net income of about 5,080 million dollars, with 71,000 employees working in the company. PepsiCo, Incorporated is the largest snack maker and second largest soft-drink maker in the world. It sells beverages and snacks in approximately 200 nations as well. In 2006, its sales reached 35,137 million dollars and had a net income of $5,642 dollars with 168,000 employees working in the company. With these numbers, one can assume that Pepsi is earning more profit if wages payouts are not considered, but Pepsi has a large number of workers working for

3.A Company that competes with Coca-Cola and sell similar products would be the known Pepsi Co. However, Coca-Cola is primary recognized globally and has always exceed according to a 2014 Nasdaq article, “Coke holds 42% of carbonated drinks while Pepsi Co. holds 30 (2014).”

The Coca-Cola Company is the world's largest beverage company, refreshing consumers with more than 500 sparkling and still brands.

Coca Cola and Pepsi are the brands with the highest brand equities. Both, Coca Cola and Pepsi have gone through the highs and lows of their business to reach that position. Coca Cola’s marketing has been changing over time with more and more products being added every day, while Pepsi has implemented several smart marketing strategies to improve its turnover and profits. So, let’s see what were the marketing strategies implemented by Coca Cola and Pepsi.

The company known as Coca-Cola today was started in September of 1919, but the first Coke brand was served as early as 1886. Since that time it has grown to be one of the most globally recognized brand names with a stock value of $167 billion. Coke’s plan has always been developed with the future in mind. Right away the company realized that it was more profitable to manufacture the concentrate used to make carbonated drinks than to bottle it. From that point on they saw the entire world, not simply the originating country, as their desired market. It seems only practical that the company should pursue this agenda until conquered then focus the effort on expanding into different product lines. This logical

As mention before, Coca-cola has 47.3 percent market share in the country’s cola market versus Pepsi which hold 44.5 percent. Coca-cola is also the brand known around the worlds, which are the largest producer and distributor of ark colas in the world. Even in the current monetary crisis, the company continues to expand and the financial position shows that Coca-cola has a strong cash position in compare to PepsiCo which the long term debt of PepsiCo is so high.

Although PepsiCo’s current assets grew their current liabilities also grew, which leads me to believe that Coca-Cola is more poised to grow as a company in the future. I believe there is room for both of these companies to fix their financial status in these areas. PepsiCo needs to find a way to increase their current assets without raising their current liabilities and Coca-Cola need to find a way to increase their current assets while maintaining their steady drop in current liabilities.

The history of Coca Cola began in 1886 when Dr. John S Pemberton, an Atlanta pharmacist created a tasty soft drink which could sell at soda fountains. Since then, Coca Cola grew to be a global brand and touched great heights. Today, it sells across 200 countries and is just as popular across all the markets and nations. The company today, owns or licenses and markets more than 500 non alcoholic beverage brands. The brand has only few major competitors in the global market. The daily servings of coca cola are estimated to be at 1.9 billion globally. (Coca-Colahellenic, n.d.) This is just another proof of the popularity of the brand which has a very large and diversified

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are fierce competitors and according to their financial statements they are both healthy companies. Therefore I would invest in Coca-Cola if I had to make the decision because it has higher income, a stronger long-term debt to networking capital ratio, steadily rising net income per common share, and a climbing and high solvency ratio. PepsiCo still shows healthy growth and outperforms Coca-Cola in many areas. I will conduct a financial analysis of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to identify their strengths and weaknesses, ultimately deciding which one is worth the investment.

Nestle: Nestle is also one of the company that competes with Coca-Cola. Nestle is considered the world’s number one drinks and food organisation in terms of sales. (https://www.nestleprofessional.us/ ).

“Coca-Cola brands are available to consumers throughout the world. Today they account for 1.7 billion servings of all beverages consumed worldwide daily. Coca-Cola has the edge in the market and because they are first to capitalize on new consumer trends. They continue to focus on continuous operating improvements, and they are ever changing to meet market demands. Pepsi Co satisfies the needs of its customers with the wide variety of products offered. They also have the different type of beverage or snack and its brands can substitute for each other. Coco-Cola and Pepsi Co is known as the top 100 most valuable brands in the world.

Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo are two industry leaders in the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry and are strong rivals of each other in the world’s beverage market. From 1975 to the mid-1990s, both companies achieved a steady growth rate of 10% in terms of revenue. Between 1970 and 2000, CSD consumption grew by an average of 3% due to the fact that there were more varieties of carbonated drinks along with many flavored drinks. There were also many substitutes widely available in portable packaging, but Americans stuck to drinking more soda than the available substitutes. The competition between both companies became weak when CSD consumption diminished to 46 gallons per year at the start of the 21st century, the lowest CSD consumption level in the United States since 1989. This was followed by different internal issues faced by both the companies. In addition to this, the profitability of both companies started reducing as there were fluctuations that could be seen by incomes generated in different years. As for Coca-Cola, the net profits were $6,797, $11,787, and $8,584, all in millions, for the year 2009, 2010, and 2011 respectively. However, for PepsiCo the profits were somewhat stable through the years. The new industry environment created intense competition among CSD businesses which required the need for new strategies to be formulated and implemented to be a top competitor in the environment.

The global beverages industry is currently a low-growth market, with an expected compound annual growth rate of 5.7% between 2017 and 2025 (Grand View Research 2017). Additionally, the industry is quite saturated with firms that offer increasingly differentiated products. However, due to this low growth rate, companies have been engaging in price competition to gain competitive advantage and increase their market share. Nevertheless, Coca Cola is a dominant force in this market, controlling 40% of the industry, and is therefore at a low risk of losing its position.