Background Information:
This scientific report is about how much mass is lost in metals after being placed in 1 molar hydrochloric acid for 30 minutes. Tin, iron and zinc will be weighed and placed into test tubes which will then be filled with 1 molar hydrochloric acid. After 30 minutes the metals will be taken out and weighed again. It is expected that the more reaction that occurs, the more mass is lost. Tin is a metal and has many uses and is commonly used to coat other metals to prevent them from corroding. An example of this is in tin cans made of tin-coated steel. Iron is another common metal which rusts easily but it is very important as it is used to manufacture steel. Zinc is a metal which is most commonly used to galvanise metals
…show more content…
The bubbles continue to rise until the time is finished.
30
Test 2:
Metal
Original Mass (grams)
Final Mass (grams)
Observations
Time in acid (minutes)
Tin
0.23
0.22
Almost no bubbles formed around the tin over the period of time.
30
Iron
0.29
0.28
Bubbles start to slowly form when the acid is poured into the test tube. After 6 minutes bubbles start to rise to the top. At 9:30 the bubbles start to slow down until there is only a few small bubbles rising to the top. At 18 minutes there is almost no bubbles rising to the top for the rest of the remaining time.
30
Zinc
0.46
0.43
Bubbles start to form and rise to the top as soon as the acid was poured into the test tube. The bubbles continued to rise to the top until the 30 minutes was up.
30
Test 3:
Metal
Original Mass (grams)
Final Mass (grams)
Observations
Time in acid (minutes)
Tin
0.26
0.26
Some bubbles formed around the inside of the test tube but almost none on the tin.
30
Iron
0.31
0.30
Bubbles slowly started to form as the acid was poured into the test tube. At 6:30 minutes the bubbles start to rise to the top. At 11 minutes the bubbles started to slow down until only a few bubbles are rising to the top. At 20 minutes the bubbles almost stop rising to the top for the rest of the time
…show more content…
Although the tin did not show any signs of reaction some of the results show there was still a 0.01 grams loss in mass. More accurate scales and more experiments conducted to give a better understanding to see if there was any actual loss in the tin. The iron on the other did show signs of reactions and had a 0.01 grams mass loss. To get more accurate results of how much mass was actually lost there would need to be more accurate scales. Signs of reaction also occurred with the zinc. There was an average of 0.033 grams mass loss. If more accurate scales are unavailable an alternative to the experiment would be to increase the concentration of acid or increase the time period of the reaction (say three days). Conclusion
In Conclusion, this experiment investigated how much mass was lost in metals after being placed in 1 molar hydrochloric acid. It was found that when more reaction occurs in the metal, the more mass that is lost. This supported the hypothesis. Based on the results of the experiment the order of reactivity for the metals is Zn > Fe > Sn. A more reactive metal loses electrons more easily than a less reactive
During the immersion of the magnesium metal in the hydrochloric acid solution, white bubbles could be seen escaping the surface of the metal as gas was produced during the reaction. Depending on the temperature of the hydrochloric acid and the overall molar concentration, the rate of reaction differed but the same signs were shown. During the reaction between the magnesium metal and higher concentrations of hydrochloric acid, it was observed that the test tube grew quite warm to the touch. As the immersed magnesium strip sank down, it appeared coated in a layer of white bubbles that fizzed like a carbonated drink. In the lower concentrations of hydrochloric acid, the strip spent some time floating at the surface of the solution in the test tube, later sinking down to the bottom as the
gas bubbles serves as evidence that the catalase enzyme is working. As catalase is breaking the
2. In Part 1, why did you not observe a stream of bubbles coming off the stainless steel screw in the sugar solution?
The pre-test helped us decide the exact details of our experiment. We started off with testing 25cm³ of 3-molar hydrochloric acid to 2g of calcium carbonate medium size chips (we decided a medium size chips before we started our pre-test as we had a choice of 3, small, medium, large). We saw that this reacted too quickly as we used 10 second intervals and we couldn't get 6 results this is because our burette could only hold 100cm³ of water, which would make our results reliable. We then decreased the amount of Calcium Carbonate to 1g and kept the same 25cm³ of 3 molar hydrochloric acid and 10 second intervals. We could get the right amount of results of this, so we then tested the other extreme - the lowest molarity.
The mole is a convenient unit for analyzing chemical reactions. Avogadro’s number is equal to the mole. The mass of a mole of any compound or element is the mass in grams that corresponds to the molecular formula, also known as the atomic mass. In this experiment, you will observe the reaction of iron nails with a solution of copper (II) chloride and determine the number of moles involved in the reaction. You will determine the number of moles of copper produced in the reaction of iron and copper (II) chloride, determine the number of moles of iron used up in the reaction of iron and copper (II) chloride, determine the ratio of moles of iron to moles of copper, and determine the number of atoms and formula units involved in
pH was recorded every time 1.00 mL of NaOH was added to beaker. When the amount of NaOH added to the beaker was about 5.00 mL away from the expected end point, NaOH was added very slowly. Approximately 0.20 mL of NaOH was added until the pH made a jump. The pH was recorded until it reached ~12. This was repeated two more times. The pKa of each trial are determined using the graphs made on excel.
8. The Hydrochloric Acid was carefully poured into the beaker with the Sodium Thiosulfate. Once the liquids had made contact, three seconds were waited until the stop watch was started.
Using elemental analysis to determine the percent mass composition of each element in a compound is the first step in creating an empirical formula. There are many different types of elemental analysis, but in this experiment gravitational analysis and Beer’s Law are used. Elemental analysis is first used to find the moles of each element, then converted to mass, and then the percent mass of the element in the product is found (2).
When the zinc was dropped in the hydrochloric acid, the substance began bubbling vigorously, forming a precipitate. Eventually, the zinc dissolved completely. After the lit wooden splint broke the surface of the test tube, there was a loud popping noise. The gas that was released was hydrogen from the acid and the popping noise was a result of the Hydrogen being burned up by the fire creating a small explosion. Two chemical changes occurred in this test: one with the formation of a precipitate (a textbook sign of a chemical change), and the other when the explosion
Place the Elodea in the water, start the stopwatch and measure and record the amount of oxygen bubbles produced by the Elodea over a 5-minute period.
The first brand of bubble gum tested was Bubble Yum. Each of us chewed a piece of Bubble Yum for 3 minutes using a timer. After three minutes, we each blew a bubble. We used a ruler to measure the diameter of the bubble. We did this by holding the ruler from the blower’s mouth to the end of the
3. If a student did not remove all of the bubbles from inside the buret before reading the initial volume and beginning the titration, will this cause the calculated concentration of the hydrochloric acid determined from that trial to be higher or lower than the actual concentration? Explain your answer in complete
There was an increasing trend because the metal was the limiting reactant in this experiment. The amount of each metal placed in the hydrochloric acid was fully used up before the acid was. From Figure 1, it is clear that aluminum produced the most amount of hydrogen gas, then magnesium in the middle and zinc produced the least amount of hydrogen gas. This shows that the same mass of each metal does not produce the same amount of hydrogen gas. Looking at the balanced equations for each of the metals (see lab 2-1, equation 1 and 2), it seems the metals have a similar stoichiometry, however zinc produced a lesser amount of hydrogen gas compared to magnesium because zinc has a higher molar mass than magnesium does. Due to this, more zinc is needed to produce the same amount of hydrogen gas as magnesium. When aluminum and magnesium are compared, it is seen that aluminum and magnesium have similar molar masses, however they have a different stoichiometry (experiment 2-1, equation 1 and 3). Two moles of aluminum react to produce three moles of hydrogen gas, while one mole of magnesium react to produce one mole of hydrogen gas. Based on this stoichiometry, a higher mass of magnesium is needed to produce the same amount of hydrogen gas as
Experimental approach: In the first reaction, copper metal turnings oxidize when put in contact with nitric acid and become copper nitrate.
We used LoggerPro to track the pH changes for 300 seconds, and then repeated the experiment while using H2O in place of Na2CO3. Results: Figure 1 This graph shows the change in pH over time in seconds of Na2CO3 as HCl was titrated into it. Each part of the graph where it becomes flat in a "plateau" shows a section