Week 8 Assignment
ACC 401
03-12-12
PepsiCo: Analysis of Recent Acquisition 1
Abstract
While mergers and acquisitions can benefit companies with economies of scale, there are many pros and cons for businesses to consider. Throughout this document, a discussion of
PepsiCo’s recent merger with Quaker Oats will be examined to ascertain what affects it will have on this oligopoly. A detailed analysis describing the current business structure, its competition, measurements regarding its position in the market, and arguments for and against the merger will be analyzed to determine the
…show more content…
This merger is highly beneficial to both parties since them more or less substitutes for one another. Thirsty people will either go in for a carbonated sweet drink or a non-carbonated fruit drink. By supplying both the alternatives less than one banner the company is retaining both the customer bases. Further, Quaker is known for its Gatorade in the sports drink segment with almost 80% of the market share, which is nearing a monopoly in this segment. The tie up would boost the sales of PepsiCo’s other fast foods, since fast foods and drinks almost always supplement each other.
This would also give PepsiCo an upper hand in the pricing policy of the drinks market. Since it would be one of the major suppliers it could possibly regulate the prices to lead to an increase in
PepsiCo: Analysis of Recent Acquisition 4
its profits. Also when a customer tends to see the same company products everywhere and that too at a slightly elevate rate, and then the element of ‘Buyers illusion’ comes into the picture.
The customers tend to believe that the product is priced higher as it is superior in quality and better as compared to other similar products priced at a lower rate. Any company prefers to diversify and
And the customer are sensitive to the price since those products are using only few times and need to be change all the time.
The industry in which PepsiCo produces and distributes its specialty beverages is vast and ever changing. With sales of carbonated soft drinks declining the past five years in a row, PepsiCo needed to look elsewhere to stimulate growth in its core business. PepsiCo thought it had found this growth in the alternative beverage industry. Pepsi expanded its line of beverage to include brands such as Gatorade, Propel, Frappucino, Aquafina, and SoBe. The industry, which experienced massive growth in the mid 2000’s, has seen a more recent decline in sales of 12.3% for it’s specialty beverage segment between 2008 and 2009. This
On the other hand, the company’s products would be more seen by consumers, which means the demand for their products probably increase.
The analysis of a company's financial statements helps in the determination of both the weaknesses and strengths of the concerned entity. Further, such an analysis helps in the determination of the future viability of firms. There are a wide range of techniques utilized in the analysis of financial statements. In that regard, it is important to note that the relevance of a horizontal, vertical as well as ratio analysis of a company's financial statements cannot be overstated. This is more so the case when it comes to the interpretation of the various dollar amounts presented in both the balance sheet and the income statement. In this text, I carry out a horizontal, vertical as well as ratio analysis of both The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. The analysis' results will be critical in the evaluation of each company's performance. Findings will be used as a basis for recommendations on how each company can improve its financial status.
According to Little (2015), contributors to this industry primarily compete based on price, branding and quality innovation. Although brand loyalty is strong in this industry, consumers are still price sensitive and are willing opt for lower priced, substitute products. (Euromonitor International, 2015). Branding and the ability to differentiate brands and products from others plays an important role in generating sales, resulting in competition within the industry (Little, 2015).
stores counted on soft drinks to generate consumer traffic, so they needed Coke and Pepsi products. But due
However, when a product is correlated with essential bodily functions and caters to an audience that pays attention to items such as calories and vitamin enrichment, the focus is more than just flavour. This, along with their new, but unclear, three-step hydration process clutters shelf-space and confuses the consumers as to their purchase decisions. This confusion could subsequently result in customers becoming disinterested and switching to alternative brands. Untapped bottled water and energy drinks market. Gatorade classifies itself as a sports hydration beverage, distinct from the enhanced bottled water and energy drinks market, although it provides many of the same benefits.
Coca-Cola is a leading beverage industry in the United States and many other countries in the world. PepsiCo is also a leading worldwide beverage company, but they are also the parent company of the Frito-Lay and Quaker Oats Companies. This makes PepsiCo a leader in the beverage, snack and cereal industries. As consumers, we have indulged in their products for many years. My personal preference has always been Pepsi over Coke, which is why I was very interested in conducting this analysis. Regardless of the results, I will always seek out a Diet Pepsi over a Diet Coke and so will many of my physician friends at Children’s Hospital who start their mornings with a Diet Pepsi. These personal preferences are what contributes to a company’s profits through net sales. However, the key performance measurement tools used are not based on sales alone. Calculating liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios on a regular basis give us a better insight on the performance and overall health of a company.
The last alternative could be to create a better marketing about their products, to compare their brand with the competition so the market can understand that the differences between prices is because of the good quality, the brand name, the knowledge, and that they are the only ones, the expert ones on those kind of products.
Financial analysis is the examination of pecuniary and financial information to accomplish the companies’ commitment. This investigation resolves the migration of organizations’ possessions, to explicate external and internal operations (Berman & Knight, 2012, p 38). This just says, a way to gauge an organization achieved and failed operations. In this logic, one may agrees that a financial analysis appraises businesses’ operating effectiveness, liquidity, and capital structure.
PepsiCo’s corporate strategy had diversified, in 2008, the company into salty and sweet snacks, soft drinks, orange juice, bottled water, and ready-to-eat drink teas and coffees, purified and functional waters, isotonic beverages, hot and ready-to-eat breakfast cereals, grain-based products, and breakfast condiments. Strategies that kept their brands at the top were tied to new product innovation, close relationships with distribution allies, international expansion, and strategic acquisitions. A new element of PepsiCo’s corporate strategy was product reformulations to make snack
PepsiCo Inc. is one of the leading brands in the world's food and beverage industry. It operates globally with a strong customer base and a wide array of products. This paper analyzes the general business environment for this leading food and beverage brand in order to assess what strategies it has been pursuing to operate in this challenging and complex environment. The analysis of internal and external environment has also been done in a view to figure out the biggest strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for the company. The final section gives an overview of the company's resources, capabilities, core competencies, and value chain which can help it to achieve a competitive advantage in its industry.
Also when a customer tends to see the same company products everywhere and that too at a slightly elevate rate, and then the element of ‘Buyers illusion’ comes into the picture. The customers tend to believe that the product is priced higher as it is superior in quality and better as compared to other similar products priced at a lower rate.
PepsiCo has the potential to encourage consumers into drinking water and eating healthier snacks that they promote. Bottled water is rising and it is a healthy substitute to sugared drinks. Restaurants, clubs and venues are using their beverage to make special drinks. This is where alcohol industries gains more profit to their company. However, with the ability to adjust customer’s demands with new and appealing products it can dominate to success.
➢ Product differentiation - Products that are relatively the same will compete based on price. Brand identification can reduce rivalry.