preview

Surfrider Beach Case Study

Satisfactory Essays

Different groups at the beach are being affected by erosion and have different viewpoints on how to resolve this issue permanently without harming the beach or making it unsafe.

Some people such as Phil Franks have felt betrayed by the council who they feel have neglected their duties protecting their residences from the effects of natural processes. Consequently, conflict between council and residents has occurred. Many residents and conservation groups have called for something to be done for the safety of the residents.

Surfers, such as those from the Surfrider foundation are against the idea of sea walls because of the dangerous wave conditions created from waves bouncing from the sea wall back into the ocean. Interestingly, the organisation obtained 3,500 signatories to a petition against upgrading …show more content…

The waves would be dangerous for swimming, surfing etc. The sea wall will benefit a few property owners at the expense of public beach-goers.

The beach has sensitive banks to the conditions of the shoreline and it is possible that the break at North Narrabeen would be at risk. The sea walls risks making the beach too dangerous, particularly the water, but the idea of buying the properties from the owners and creating instead an extended dune system will create a more natural state of the beach, letting natural coastal processes take place

Wendy Harmer and Brendan Donohoe who protested against the building of the sea wall said: “The water just smashes up against (sea walls) and scours all the sand away … your property would have been protected but then off the edge of your lawn would have been just a steep drop and no beach.” They believe the wall is not aesthetically appealing and there are other methods that could be used

Get Access