Screeching and wailing can be heard throughout the store as a little boy, no older than 4, throws a temper tantrum. His parents refused to buy him any candy while they're waiting to be checked out. The father quickly leans down and swats him on the bottom. This startles the young boy, making the screaming stop. Around the family, some of the customers sigh in relief, while others shoot disapproving looks towards the father; appalled that he spanked the boy. Corporal punishment is an effective way to discipline children that benefits social interactions, child behavior, and lowers the crime rate.
Corporal punishment allows for children to interact with others as in an appropriate manner. Children who are not disciplined do not understand how their actions will impact those around them, which can lead to others interacting negatively or avoiding them. This usually occurs because the parents are afraid to reprimand their children, which leads to the parents giving in to all their children's demands to avoid them throwing a tantrum. The children become spoiled and self-serving, and this attitude is reflected in their social interactions. On the other hand, the use of corporal punishment promotes children to excel in school and be more active in their community (Morefield 4). It provides children with the control they need in order to become functioning members of society. It allows them to regulate their emotions in a socially acceptable way. By doing so, they do not overload
Corporal punishment teaches kids to be respectful. In source A it is said “ Kids at the school sat the paddle definitely think twice about acting up’’ With this being saidis shows that the kids being hit with the paddle makes them never want to act up again so they do not get hit. In source A it is also said that John C. Calhoun Elementary earned three statewide awards. The kids began to be more respectful and it changed the school for the better. It was also said in source A “ There will always be new kids who need to learn the limits at school. ” Having corporal punishment will teach the kids the limits and they will learn to be more respectful.
The intentions of any responsible and loving parent is giving their child the best education possible and the best values that the child may receive. It is evident that the love of a parent lies not only in indulgence and giving the child the best, but also in raising a complete, mindful, and balanced personality. Discipline is the cornerstone of the decent education, and it sometimes requires challenging measures, one of which is corporal punishment, namely, spanking. Many parents today feel that it is perfectly fine to use spanking as a form of discipline for their children. There is a huge debate about this topic all over the world. The use of corporal punishment as child discipline is both ethical and effective. Spanking a child can teach them right from wrong. It is effective to explain to the child why their behavior was wrong so that they may understand why the spanking was enforced, however, only implied in a mindful aim for a strong reason.
Child discipline is an important part of parenthood. It is challenging for adults to manage children’s behaviors and find the correct lessons that will benefit their children. According to the research performed by Flynn (1998), most parents in the United States agree that "it is sometimes necessary to discipline a child with a good, hard spanking" (p.26). Socolar et al. performed research which agreed that “corporal punishment of children persists—roughly fifty percent of the parents of toddlers in the United States use corporal punishment as a regular method of disciplining their children.” (as cited in Gershoff, 2010, p.32). That is not to say that physical punishment is the solution as it can stop a behavior immediately but the results
In particular, when a child is struck for hurting another child, it actually shows that through aggression that they can become the aggressor and get what they want, usually a ‘child is more likely to imitate the aggressive behaviour in the long-term.’ (Gershoff, 2010). Actions like this tend to result in abusive behaviour flowing through to teenage years and even adulthood as it allows them to get exactly what they want. The use of corporal punishment by parents is used with the intention of making a child change their actions immediately and to reduce it occurring again, although this has been proven to be only be as effective as almost any other measure. The other aspect of psychological changes are the likes of mental health issues, given the violent aspects of corporal punishment. Studies have found that ‘the more frequently or severely children are spanked or hit, the more likely they are to have symptoms of depression or anxiety.’ (Gershoff, 2010). The circumstances around the development of these issues being caused by the action of punishing a child in this manner suggests that the best scenario is to not allow it to take place anymore. There are so many other options to use when disciplining a child that for these to still be considered pliable even with these dangers is not reasonable. Studies also suggest that the use of corporal
We will find in the spanked kids a physical and verbal form of aggression against others: classmate, family members, friends etc… it is like an expression of all frustration accumulated by spanked and frustrated child. Another study published in the Akron Law Review examined criminal records and found that children raised where a legal ban on parental corporal punishment is in effect are much more likely to be involved in crime. When kids and spanked or abuse in their childhood are spanked, they develop a hatred. The immediate consequence in their adolescence is physical aggression. It is the most common in the adolescent behavior and are likely to result in physical injury. The most extreme form of violence is a homicide. Thus, fights involving weapons and fights by teenagers old enough to be able to inflict serious injuries are what see in the street every day. So finally spanked kids destroy them more than it help them to behave as parents would like to. It is why it is better to choose a different way to help kids to understand and to learn what is acceptable and what is not. In fact Dozens of countries have banned parental corporal punishment, such as Germany, Italy, and in 2007 New Zealand, which use force to correct children causes complete criminal penalties, and where the mother cannot even legally take the hand of her child to bring it where it refuses to go. And according to Krisha McCoy, discipline is a way of teaching children the restraint and values necessary to become competent and independent adults. When our child behaves negatively, the best way to teach him the positive behavior should be for example to explain what is wrong in his behavior, then explain or show with examples what is better to do. Also and the explanation of the reasons of positive behaviors regarding others, environments, society, laws, rules. And the consequences of “not doing this way” or of “doing
2011) Corporal punishment exhibited by parents onto children has been a topic in psychology for many decades. It has been reported that approximately 94% of American parents are spanking their children by the time they are 3 or 4 years old (Gershoff 2001). Whether or not this method has been effective has caused many uprising with opinion papers in the field of psychology. “The ongoing debate to whether the benefits of corporal punishment might outweigh any potential hazards; some have concluded that corporal punishment is both effective and desirable, whereas others have concluded that corporal punishment is ineffective at best and harmful at worst,” (Gershoff 2001). As stated before certain parenting styles enforce punishment onto their children if there is requirement not met or the child obedience falters though these children usually don’t turn out to be in the best emotional state as an adult (Ribeiro 2009). “Previous researches pointed out those adults (parents and teachers), who were physically punished in their childhood, are more supportive of corporal punishment than those who were not subjected to physical punishment” (Naz et al. 2011). This explains reasons in why punishment continues throughout a family’s generation, because as a child when corporal punishment or just punishments in
Punishment is "consequence of behaviour that decrease probability of behaviour reoccurring" (Cain & Conduit, 2014). Punishment on children elicits polarising opinions from general public, legislators and researchers alike. Consequently, significant research has been conducted on punishment including corporal punishment (CP), its application and impacts. This review aims to provide selection of literature exploring its effectiveness as behaviour modification strategy in children. Punishment is effective if target behaviour has reduced (short term efficacy) and sustained (long term efficacy) with negligible undesirable outcomes/impacts. For sustained efficacy, understanding and acceptance of punishment by child (Grusec & Goodnow,1994) would also be required.
When it comes to disciplining children, many people question whether or not physical punishment should be used when a child is doing wrong. Will children benefit from it or will it lead to psychological issues later on in life? There are many people that do believe in physical punishment. They were spanked while growing up, and simply state, “I turned out just fine.” Then there are some people that totally oppose of it all together. For these differences in everyone’s beliefs, several studies have been conducted to prove whether or not physical punishment truly is effective.
On the contrary, studies prove the cumulative negative affects corporal punishment has on children. These negative consequences include (but are not limited to) harm to cognitive ability and development, antisocial and violent behavior, potential for future abusive behavior during adulthood, bodily harm and injury, sexual development problems, emotional distress, and can even be a gateway to more abusive means of discipline. Admittedly, it is astonishing that all of these negative consequences result from a legal administration of discipline that 90% of all Americans say they have used (Muller).
Many studies have come out with negative effects that can come about from using many forms of corporal punishment. As parents we need to ask ourselves are we able to control ourselves when we are upset at our kids? Are we able to be fair to our kids? Can the things we do to our children come back and turn out to be used against us and others? “Corporal punishment
The world has changed in many different ways, but there are still things that need to be changed for the better. Corporal punishment is one of those things. All around the world, corporal punishment is affecting children in many ways. It is described as a form of discipline that hurts a child in a way and is used both in homes and schools. It has been going on for years upon years and very few people try to stop it. People believe corporal punishment is good for children, but there have been so many negative outcomes that other people argue against it. Although some people believe that corporal punishment helps improve a child’s behavior, corporal punishment should not be used because it could be used excessively and it is ineffective.
When children are physically abused, they will suffer from fear, nervousness, and loneliness. Physical punishment might come in the form of kicking, punching, or leaving some harmful physical marks due to heavy beating. Some people think that it is good to use violence and toughness with kids to make them mature and strong enough to overcome their problems throughout their lives. However, abusing is weakening the kids and making them fragile for what they might face in the future. According to Beth Morrisey MLIS author of “The Effect of Punishment on Children” (2015) states that Punishment is anything that reduces the frequency of unwanted behaviors, should suppress inappropriate behaviors completely, but this is infrequently the real result. Parents must remember that punishment, particularly corporal punishment, is different from discipline. Corporal punishment is the infliction of physical discomfort on someone condemned of crime. Actual, parents who use corporal punishment fix consequently in the form of spanking or remarkable a
The use of corporal punishment has been a principal component of parental discipline throughout history (Greven, 1991), it has also been the focus of debate within psychological research for a substantial amount of time (Caselles & Milner, 2000, Glueck & Glueck, 1950, Sears, 1961).
According to Smith, physical discipline among children was proven to cause aggression, damage to social relationships, poorer academic achievement, weak parent-child relationships, and development of internal problems such as anxiety or depression (n.d., para 1.). The negative long term effects that physical punishment produces are not worth the short period of time that a child complies. If more parents were informed on the damages that follow corporal punishment, this means of guidance and instruction could possibly decrease ensuring a higher quality of life for children in the future.
This paper explores whether physical punishment is an effective form of discipline. Establishing whether to use physical punishment as a form of discipline is an ongoing dilemma in today’s society. Supporters of using physical means to discipline children state that children learn best through pain and that mild physical contact will have no negative effects on a child. However, physical punishment should not be used as a form of discipline because studies have shown that it leads to depression, an increase in antisocial behavior, a decrease in cognitive development, and an increase in aggression. Physical punishment is also a contributing factor leading to child abuse. Instead of inflicting pain in their children, parents should engage in constructive and calm communication in order to effectively discipline their children.