Everyone should be treated fairly. When leaders treat everyone fairly it can build a strong morale, better relationships between the leader and direct report and then trust will be established. Of course, treating everyone fairly and equally can get confusing at times. The leader may have two direct reports and one of the employees does substantially more work than the other and the leader can always depend on them to accomplish the task at hand within the required deadline. On the other hand, the leader has another employee that completes the task but doesn’t put in quite as much effort. If the leader treats the two employees equally then the one employee that has gone above and beyond what is required of them could start to build resentment, they …show more content…
Eisenhower showed moral judgment, courage, compassion, honesty, and fairness. His judgments were based on facts. When General George S. Patton, had slapped and terrorized two soldiers, Eisenhower responded to Patton with a stern letter informing him such behavior would not be tolerated and urged the general to apologize to the soldiers. Fairness was a big virtue of Eisenhower as it exemplified a great leader. (Gini & Green, 2013, p. 5) By the same token, when treated everyone fairly regardless if the employee is new or has been with the organization for a number of years when they make a mistake the leader must hold them accountable. Leaders must have the courage to hold other’s accountable for their actions. There is a reason why a person is a leader and one of the beliefs are that as a leader you will hold your direct reports accountable and will deal appropriately with the weaker direct reports. (Bushey, p. 15) Likewise, if the leader makes a mistake they must take ownership for their error. Having the courtesy to say I apologize for my error will grant the leader respects and this will last longer than any embarrassment. (Bushey, p.
There is no such thing as being treated fair in this industry, however, the artist is the employer at the end of the day and must treat his or her workers with kindness and respect to their image professional. I am convinced that everyone is not going to be a winner or loser this includes the in between as well. No one is really treated the same, you can reward every artist with a free keyboard but his or her weakness or straight will be in the play of the sound, like fairness is in love and war. The delivery and response is fair when everyone does the same thing at the same pace, same time, and the same movement. Top performers whether artists or not, do not turn out to be winners all the time, some turn out to be losers too. There is always time to manage people in the direction of a goal. The managers just have to know how to lead their objectives to avoid wasting time on under-managed tasks and non-skilled workers. As Bruce said; “It’s Okay to be the Boss” (Tulgan,
You believe in treating everyone equally? Do you treat your staff, subcontractors, clients, and patients equally?
The thing that stood out to me the most in this article was the way Linda Galindo talked about leaders. "It is only true leadership if you are accountable—you answer for your results good or bad without fault, blame, or guilt." I think so often it is easy to pass off the blame for things but I appreicate the way she ties our accountablity to being a leader. As I look at my life I can see that so many people I know who are natural born leaders are the people who aren't afraid to take responsibilty for their actions even when it isn't glamorous. This really challenges me to look at the kind of leader I am and ask the question, am I held accountable for my actions? I have a mentor that I meet with regulary to talk to and also to challenge me,
Now, when determining the criteria that the evaluation form should contain, the components will vary as deemed appropriate based on the purpose of the appraisal; however, there are a few components that are pertinent. Ensuring that employees are treated fairly is not only a legal obligation, but an ethical one also. As a member of the administrative staff, I am involved heavily in decision making and the monitoring of processes and procedures. According to a 2000 article by Mueller & Wynn, the egoistic, equity-based distributive justice value is the justice value that has received the most attention in justice theory and research, and it is the form of justice most often the concern in the modern
For the individual to perceive themselves as being treated fairly, that individual must believe that the ratio of his inputs to his outcomes to be equivalent to those around him. If everything were equal, then, it would be acceptable for a more senior colleague to be paid more, since that person contributes greater value in experience. As individuals, we constantly make
I think leaders have a responsibility to ensure a climate of civility, because if no one has respect to each other, that institution or organization cannot execute its mission. If no one trusts each other, they don’t show honesty which leads a failure. A leader should create an environment that everyone works together and shows respect and trusts each other. By doing this, the institution
First, organizations should ensure they have the right leaders. Leadership is crucial. Porath (2017) notes that being treated with respect is an aspect that is very important to employees “than recognition and appreciation, communicating an inspiring vision, providing feedback, and even providing opportunities for learning, growth, and development”
Even though all human beings are viewed as being equal, I do not think just one leadership style is always appropriate for every group of people. For any kind of leadership style to be successful, it must first not be oppressing to either the leader or the led. Every action that is taken should be accounted for. The leader should not be in complete control but should decentralize his powers. Even with decentralization, he/she should make sure to follow up on what the representatives are doing, making sure they are doing their jobs well and remove from position all those who are not working up to expectation or abusing their
Leaders need to show respect for everyone in the group. Group members need to feel that if they put input their input will be taking into account and not forgotten. Otherwise, they will be not like to put the same input for future tasks. Furthermore, liking everyone is different from respecting. Liking is when everyone has a close relationship and there might not be respect. Respect is for everyone even if one does not agree with the other person all the time. Indeed, Leader does not need to like everyone, but it needs to show respects to all group
Chief executive officers engage in practices to create a larger short-return investment, however, they are still humans beings at the end of the day. If a regular employee were to be given the same training and opportunity as a CEO, they would be as capable to accomplish the same tasks. To that reasoning CEOs are not above any other human being, and this leads me to the next topic. My concept of fairness allows every individual to be treated by needs not actions. In “Why Not Socialism?” Cohen proposes the idea of a communal state, where regardless of the amount of work a camper inputs, the output is the same for everyone. My idea of equality, is that every human being is treated alike without bias. The chief executive officer who is on top
William Frederick Halsey, Jr., was the South Pacific Fleet Admiral during World War II, His passion for naval aviation helped save the community and provide national support from the American people back home. He was the major source of moral during the war for the American people, and always produced results whenever and wherever it was needed. Although Halsey’s leadership style has been disputed more often than not, his decisions and role as Fleet Admiral during World War II served greatly in the American victory over Japan. HALSEY HELPED TIP THE BALANCE OF POWER IN THE PACIFIC DURING THE EARLY STAGES OF WORLD WAR II DURING 1942-1943, AND ESTABLISH THE IMPORTANCE OF AVIATION AS A COMMUNITY IN THE NAVY.
In order to properly examine organizational justice in the labor establishment and the direct and indirect influences it have on employees several articles were reviewed to examine the similarities and differences for further understanding. Interactional justice was examined through the role a leader plays in an organization and the effects that they have on their subordinates. Through this it can be positive or negative, therefore being that a leader boosts their employee’s morale by encouraging them, showing respect and treating them fairly. By negatively influencing them would be if a leader was abusive or takes advantage, does not include or listen to their subordinates. Procedural and distributive justice was also examined through fairness, stress, equality, and satisfaction. Employees just want to be treated with respect and be heard by their leaders. They want to be treated fairly and
While we all have been taught this when we finally ascend to the level of supervisor something makes us want to make the people under us feel the same way we did under our supervisor so we start to give orders and command to our employees which reduces general morale in the company and leads to people quitting or doing less and poorer quality work for the business. Instead of giving orders to the employees a supervisor should work besides the employees to complete the job or project, instead of blaming people for failures in the project instead to work with the people who are failing to meet certain goals in the project, find out what is preventing them from meet the appointed goals, and to rectify the issues.
J. Thomas Wren incorporates many different philosophers’ views in order to demonstrate that leaders differed greatly in the
Organizational justice describes the individuals’ (or groups’) perception of the fairness of treatment received from an organization and their behavioral reaction to such perceptions (1). It is essential for understanding organizational behavior (2). During the past decades, the study of justice has received major research attention from a variety of disciplines, including economics, psychology, law, and organizational science (3).