preview

To Kill A Mockingbird Compare And Contrast Essay

Decent Essays

To Kill a Mockingbird Compare and Contrast Essay

In the movie, as well as the book, there are multiple times where the rhetorical strategy logos is used. An example of one of them is when Atticus says, “The state has not produced one iota of medical evidence to the effect that the crime Tom Robinson is charged with ever took place.” I know it is logos because it is a fact that the state hasn’t given any medical evidence to prove that Tom is guilty of the crime he is being charged for. Atticus is using this fact to try to persuade some people with logic that it wasn’t Tom who did anything to Mayella. I think that this part was better in the movie because the actor who played as Atticus made it more dramatic which made the whole situation more effective and serious. The book and the movie also had many examples of ethos in them. One of them would be where it says, “..., but it does require you to be sure beyond all reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant.” That shows that it’s ethos because Atticus is saying that the jury needs to be absolutely sure that they are right about Tom Robinson before they sentence him because if they weren’t sure, it wouldn’t be fair or ethical. Another example would be where it says, “She was white, and she tempted a Negro. She …show more content…

An example of pathos that was used is where it says, “And so a quiet, respectful, humble Negro who had the unmitigated temerity to ‘feel sorry’ for a white woman has had to put his word against two white peoples.” I know that this quote is pathos because Atticus is trying to explain Tom so that he seems harmless by saying that he is quiet, humble, and respectful. He also tries to get people to feel bad so they know Tom isn’t guilty. This part was better in the movie because of how they put the camera on Atticus and his facial expressions changed. It really makes you start to feel bad that Tom is going through all of the

Get Access