preview

Unknown Lab Report

Good Essays

An unknown was given to our group from the professor. The unknown was in nutrient broth, the group received unknown number 3. And the task was to identify the unknown and try to make an educated guess, and identify the unknown #3.
A wide variety of processes had been performed to determine what culture had been acquired in class. My group had acquired culture tube unknown #3. We first isolated the bacteria. In this step we took the broth of the unknown #3 and grew it on an agar plate. The first process that had been performed was discontinuous streaking, and continuous streaking to grow the culture for future use in the lab and to have extra to perform a whole variety of test to determine the unknown. The next experiment that had been performed …show more content…

megaterium Unknown #3
Starch Hydrolysis E. coli Medium appears clear (+) B. megaterium Unknown #3
Tryptophan Hydrolysis E. coli Red layer top of the tube (+) E. aerogenes Unknown #3
Urea Hydrolysis E. coli Hot pink (+) P. vulgaris Unknown #3
Hydrogen Sulfied Production P. vulgaris Dark black color in medium (+) E. aerogenes Unknown #3
Citrate Utilization E. coli Pursian blue (+) E. aerogenes Unknown #3
Litmus Milk Reaction E. coli Different reactions based on wide variety of factors

P. aeruginosa S. epidermidis Yogurt Unknown #3
Oxidase Production P. fluorescence Dark red or purple (+) E. aerogenes Unknown #3

260/280 should be greater than 2.0, if greater than 2.0 there is no protein impurities. 260/280 if less than 1.8 there is other organic impurities. And ng/ul is the density of DNA. Representative image taken from Brigham Young University website

Figure #1 This picture show the gram stain of unknown #3. The image is under 1000x magnification using oil immersion technique. Gram (-)

Figure #2 This is a picture of our unknown in the oxygen requirement test. This organism is facultative/ Aero tolerant.

Biochemical
Test Microorganisms …show more content…

Our results had been inconclusive in this part of the lab. The unknown was run with the other class due to the loss of a PCR tube. The tube had been redone and run in the gel and results had been inconclusive. No results had been shown for our gel. Meaning something along the way had been done incorrectly and as a result the experiment had no results. It is possible that primers or something was not added to the tube causing failed results. A wide variety of things could have gone wrong. But what we do know is that results should have occurred. In figure #6 the gel that was done by our class we could see that there are results. There is a very noticeable band that shows that this experiment could be done and that it wasn’t any machines fault but human error. The class had a band around 1500 base pairs which would be completely correct because 16s rRNA gene is usually 1500 base pairs long (Clarridge

Get Access