c. Should this project be undertaken?-Select-If so, should the firm do the mitigation?I. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate forthe environmental impact of the project since its IRR without mitigation is greater than its IRRwhen mitigation costs are included in the analysis.II. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for theenvironmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV whenmitigation costs are not included in the analysis.III. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate forthe environmental impact of the project since its NPV without mitigation is greater than its NPVwhen mitigation costs are included in the analysis.IV. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for theenvironmental impact of the project since its IRR with mitigation is greater than its IRR whenmitigation costs are not included in the analysis.V. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate forthe environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPVwhen mitigation costs are not included in the analysis.-Select- ✓ A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the projectwould be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend anadditional $11 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required todo so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $69 million, and theexpected cash inflows would be $23 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation,the annual inflows would be $24 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%.a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, ananswer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Roundyour answers to two decimal places.NPV: $millionIRR:%Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example,an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations.Round your answers to two decimal places.NPV: $millionIRR:b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated?I. The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/orfines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though themine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated allcosts in the "no mitigation" analysis from not doing the environmental mitigation.II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation.III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored.IV. The environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, sincethe mine is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation"analysis.%-Select-V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only beconsidered at the time in which they actually occur.c. Should this project be undertaken?-Select-If so, should the firm do the mitigation?I. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate forthe environmental impact of the project since its IRR without mitigation is greater than its IRR---TAT — — _------

Here, Initial Outlay is $69 million Addition Outlay for Mitigation is $11 million Cash Inflow in…

Answered: A mining company is considering a new…

Essentials Of Investments

11th Edition

ISBN:9781260013924

Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PS

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does Invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 10%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round Intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round…
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round…
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate…
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10.33 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $63 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $21 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $22 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 14%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ million IRR: % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not…
A mining company isconsidering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project wouldbe legal, but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend anadditional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would notbe required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $60 million,and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm doesinvest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACCis 12%.a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation.b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated?c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation?
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not…
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%. Should this project be undertaken? 1. The project should not be undertaken under the "no mitigation" assumption. 2. The project should be undertaken only under the " no mitigation" assumption. 3. The project should not be undertaken under the "mitigation" assumption. 4. Even when mitigation is considered the project has a positive NPV, so it should be undertaken. 5. Even when mitigation is considered the project has a…
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $51 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $17 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $18 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 11% a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places.NPV: $ millionIRR: % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations.…
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 10%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55.NPV $ millionIRR % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an…
Please refer to picture for the complete question. Please answer parts A and B A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $11 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $69 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $23 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $24 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 14%.
A LOINE CONS company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjustedd weighted average cost of capital(WACC) is 12%. Calculate the Net present value and internal rate of return with and without mitigation. Shouldd the project be undertaken? If so,, should the firm do mitigation?
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV with and without mitigation. Show the workings

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS