Consider an environment in which there is a one-to-one mapping between user-level threads and kernel-level threads that allows one or more threads within a process to issue blocking system calls while other threads continue to run. Explain why this model can make multithreaded programs run faster than their single-threaded counterparts on a uniprocessor computer.

Consider an environment in which there is a one-to-one mapping between user-level threads and kernel-level threads that allows one or more threads within a process to issue blocking system calls while other threads continue to run. Explain why this model can make multithreaded programs run faster than their single-threaded counterparts on a uniprocessor computer.

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter11: Operating Systems

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11VE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There may be situations when user-level threads are preferable than kernel-level threads. User- and kernel-level threads vary in what ways? Does one kind outperform the others in a given situation?
In a single processor, threads run one at a time in such a way as to provide an illusion of concurrency. Execution of these multiple threads on a single CPU in some order is called scheduling. Explain the scheduling process on a single processor.
Is it possible for a parent process to wait for the termination of his child process and then to continue working on his own task? How can it be done using threads where a thread could be bound to wait for the termination of another thread and then continue working on his task. Write a piece of code to demonstrate both these cases in a single program. This is the Question from System Programming
This may be accomplished by analyzing the scheduling of processes and threads side by side and comparing and contrasting the two.
Is it more efficient to employ threads that operate at the user level as opposed to those that operate at the kernel level? What sets apart threads that run on the user level from those that run on the kernel level? Is there ever a point in time when one kind is more advantageous than another?
Is it possible for a parent process to wait for the termination of his child process and then to continue working on his own task? How can it be done using threads where a thread could be bound to wait for the termination of another thread and then continue working on his task. Write a piece of code to demonstrate both these cases in a single program. Please Note: This question is from system Programming subject.
Consider an environment in which there is a one-to-one mapping between user-level threads and kernel-level threads that allows one or more threads within a process to issue blocking system calls while other threads continue to run. Explain why this model can make multithreaded programs run faster than their single-threaded coun- terparts on a uniprocessor computer. LEWI96-42
Consider a situation that arises due to the use of several threads of processing by an operating system.
What is the difference between a thread running in user mode and a thread running in the kernel? Do any advantages exist that one species may have over another?
Why is it preferable in a cooperative multithreading system for two threads to communicate with each other via the event queue rather than directly? What are some of the drawbacks of direct communication?
Is the usage of user-level threads superior than kernel-level threads? What is the difference between user-level threads and kernel-level threads? Is there ever a period when one kind is superior than another?
Discuss the terms "user-level threads" and "kernel-level threads" and how they relate to multithreading.