Consider that there are two goods, good X and good Y. a) Give the definition of "indifference curve" (briefly in one sentence). b) Is it possible for two indifference curves to intersect at a certain consumption bundle in (X,Y) plane? If yes, explain and give an example. If not, explain and provide a reason for why it is not possible.

Consider that there are two goods, good X and good Y. a) Give the definition of "indifference curve" (briefly in one sentence). b) Is it possible for two indifference curves to intersect at a certain consumption bundle in (X,Y) plane? If yes, explain and give an example. If not, explain and provide a reason for why it is not possible.

Microeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617406

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter7: Consumer Choice: Maximizing Utility And Behavioral Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4. If we have the utility function, U(x)=(x−7)^2, and we know that there is an indifference set around x = 4 and an upper contour set of x = 6. How to graphically represent this function? I'm confused about how to draw the upper contour set on the graph? I know the concept that upper contour is the area over the convex line, but don't know how to put it on the graph. Could you draw a simple graph to help me identify the upper contour?
Suppose you have an income of $24 and the only two goods you consume are apples (x1) and peaches (x2). The price of apples is $4 and the price of peaches is $3. Suppose that your optimal consumption is 4 peaches and 3 apples. a. Illustrate this in a graph using indifference curves and budget lines. b. Now suppose that the price of apples falls to $2 and I take enough money away from you to make you as happy as you were originally. Will you buy more or fewer peaches? Provide a graphical representation.
Draw YOUR indifference curve for the consumption of two goods (you pick the goods – be creative!) Make sure to include labels. Why did you choose these two goods? Why do you view these as being a tradeoff? Carefully explain why the indifference curve has the shape you created. (Hint: Discuss the slope. What it means and how it changes) Determine a budget that will be allocated towards your consumption of these two goods. Given the budget, prices for the goods, and your preferences, how will you find the utility-maximizing combination? Give an intuitive answer as well as a graphical answer (make sure to label the graph accordingly).
Why is it impossible for two indifference curves to intersect one another?
Suppose that Jones and Smith have each decided to allocate $1000 per year to an entertainment budget in the form of hockey games or rock concerts. They both like hockey games and rock concerts and will choose to consume positive quantities of both goods. However, they differ substantially in their preferences for these two forms of entertainment. Jones prefers hockey games to rock concerts, while Smith prefers rock concerts to hockey games. a. Draw a set of indifference curves for Jones and a second set for Smith. b. Using the concept of marginal rate of substitution, explain why the two sets of curves are different from each other.
Answer the following short questions:a. Suppose that a consumer’s preferences between goods x andy are represented by the utility function u(x, y) = x^2 + 16xy + 64y^2. If these two goods have the same price, describe the optimal consumptionchoice of this consumer.b. Suppose that when the price of a good change, the incomeand substitution effects change the consumer’s demand for that goodin opposite directions.i. Is this good a normal or an inferior good? Explain.ii. Is this good a Giffen or an ordinary good? Explain.c. Is the following statement true or false? The differencebetween a monopolist’s marginal cost and its profit-maximizing price issmaller when the demand is more elastic.
Suppose Cenk consumes only two goods, Good X (inferior good) and Good Y (normal good). Given that these goods are imperfect substitutes of each other and he chooses the bundle, which maximizes his satisfaction, answer the following questions. a. For Cenk, draw a hypothetical equilibrium using his budget constraint and indifference curves and show his optimal bundle. (Place Good X on the horizontal and Good Y on the vertical axis.) b. Say, the price of Good X decreases. Show the Income and Substitution effects of this price change on Cenk's optimal
Carol has very weird preferences. She only cares about quantity. When evaluating a bundle, Carol only looks at the highest amount of a good she can consume in each bundle, regardless of whether it is of eggs or dumplings. She is indifferent between two bundles only when the largest consumption of a good within each bundle is the same across bundles. So, for instance, if a bundle offers 5 eggs and 1 dumpling she finds that bundle indifferent to a bundle offering 4 eggs and 5 dumplings. These preferences are transitive. But are they monotone? And convex?
Michael derives utility from only two goods, hamburger (Qh) and fanta (Qf). The marginal utility that Michael receives from cake (MUh) and donuts (MUH) are given as follows: MUh = Qd MUf = Qh Michael has an income of R500 and the price of hamburger (Ph) and fanta (Pf) are both R100. What is Michael's budget constraint? (1) Select one: a. 500 = 100Qh + 100Qf b. 500 = 100PH+ 100PF c. 500 = (Ph)(Qf) d. 500 = (QhXQf).
Suppose utility can be measured by "utils" and that Jim buys both coffee and bagels. The price of coffee is $2 and the price of a bagel is $3. If Jim is currently consuming coffee and bagels such that the marginal utility from the last cup of coffee consumed was 6 utils and the marginal utility from the last bagel consumed was 12 utils, is Jim maximizing utility? Why or why not? If not, what should Jim do? Explain in detail.
Two students, Nick and Sofia, are discussing normal and inferior goods. Nick says that if Frodo buys more beer when the price of beer goes up, then beer must be an inferior good for Frodo. If, on the other hand, he buys less beer when the price of beer goes up, then beer must be a normal good for Frodo. Sofia disagrees: "Normal and inferior goods are about income changes, not price changes. Therefore, we do not have enough information: beer could be an inferior or normal good in either of these cases." Do you agree or disagree? Carefully explain your point of view. Support your argument with graphs of income, substitution and total effects (please put beer on the horizontal axis and the other goods on the vertical axis). Please assume that Frodo's preferences over beer and other goods are strictly convex and satisfy "more is better" assumption.
Consider the indifference curve map and budget constraint for two goods, X and Y. Suppose the good on the horizontal axis, X, is normal. When the price of X increases, the substitution effect a) and income effect both cause an increase in the consumption of X. b) causes a decrease in the consumption of X, and the income effect causes an increase in the consumption of X. However, the substitution effect is greater than the income effect. c) causes an increase in the consumption of X, and the income effect causes a decrease in the consumption of X. However, the substitution effect is greater than the income effect. d) and income effect both cause a decrease in the consumption of X.