Consider the two countries of Syria and UAE. A business man wants to do trade between the two countries. If Syria produces maximum of 2 million kilograms of tomato and maximum of 4000 kilograms of Halwa, then draw the production possibility frontier What is the absolute value of the slope of this production possibility frontier? In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, why the two countries are different?

Consider the two countries of Syria and UAE. A business man wants to do trade between the two countries. If Syria produces maximum of 2 million kilograms of tomato and maximum of 4000 kilograms of Halwa, then draw the production possibility frontier What is the absolute value of the slope of this production possibility frontier? In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, why the two countries are different?

Microeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617406

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter20: International Trade

Section20.1: International Trade Theory

Problem 1ST

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Now suppose that if Zimbabwe uses all of its resources, it can produce 50,000 tons of metal ores or 100,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). Suppose that if South Africa uses all of its resources, it can produce 20,000 tons of metal ores or 80,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). What is the direction of trade (who exports what to whom)? Be sure to give the opportunity costs of production of both goods for both countries. What is one potential price of metal ores in terms of trucks at which both Zimbabwe and South Africa would benefit from trade? Rank the autarkic prices and the world price of metal ores from lowest to highest.
There are two countries, Atlantis and Thule, and two goods, Clothing (C) and food (F) In Atlantis, it takes 3 units of labour to produce a unit of Clothing and 3 units of labour to make a unit of Food. In Thule, a unit of Clothing requires 2 units of labour, and a unit of Food requires 5 units of labour. Assume that Atlantis has 300 units of labour, and Thule has 500 units of labour. (a) What is the opportunity cost of Food in terms of Clothing in each country? (b) Which country has an absolute advantage in which good? (c) Which country has a comparative advantage in which good? Why? (d) Draw the production possibilities frontier for each country (put Food on the horizontal axis). Label axes and slopes. (e) Draw the world production possibilities frontier (assuming labour does not move between countries). Again, put Food on the horizontal axis. Label axes and important points on - 2 - the diagram. (f ) Draw the world relative supply curve (labelled RS) for F/C with the relative price…
Suppose that Egypt produces cotton and lamb, and that it has comparative advantage in cotton. Draw Eqypt's non-linear (i.e., concave) PPF and FTBL, with cotton on the horizontal axis and lamb on the vertical axis. Be sure to label the axes, the PPF, the FTBL and the autarky and free trade prices. Also show the quantities of imports and exports. (Note, there are no values for the prices, so just show the price ratio and how it's represented in the graph.)
In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize? If Malaysia wishes to trade 10 tons of rubber with Japan in exchange for radios, what is the lowest number of radios it should ask for in order to benefit from trade? What is the largest number of radios Japan can offer in order to benefit from trade?
In a world where the only goods are cell phones and cereal: Jennereelam can produce: 80m kilos of cereal, and 200k cell phones, while Jonathannadu can produce: 30m kilos of cereal, and 15k cell phones. Even though Jennereelam is a bigger economy and can produce more of each product than Jonathannadu, this guy named Ricardo insists that they will both benefit if they trade. What is Ricardo's argument called, and why does he make the claim?
In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, suppose the two factors of production are: high-skilled labor (H) and regular labor (L). The two sectors are manufacturing and business services. Manufacturing uses regular labor more intensively, and business services uses high-skilled labor more intensively. The two countries are the U.S. and China, and the U.S. has a comparative advantage in business services. a. Illustrate the effect of opening up to trade on the U.S. with the PPF and indifference curve diagram. Make sure you clearly label everything. What happens to the relative price of business services in the U.S.? Show clearly the gains from trade. b. What happens to the relative wage of high-skilled labor? Does inequality (the skill premium) increase? Show all work and explain. 2. Evidence for or against Heckscher-Ohlin model Leontieff Paradox i. Briefly describe the paradoxii.We discussed several explanations for the paradoxical result in class. Briefly describe two explanations. Inequality…
Country A bans imports of country B beef. What type of poilic was this ban and what economic reasons may country A have had for it? Use offer-curve analysis to discuss the effects of this policy change. How does your answer change with your assumption as to whether A is a large or small country?
Is it possible to find equilibrium prices in a linear exchange model for six countries whose directed graph looks like the one below, and why? The arrows have the usual meaning, for example, the arrow from A to B means that country A is selling its product to country B. A BA C- D F E a. No, because it is not possible to go from C to F following the arrows. O b. Yes, because it is possible to go from any country to any other country following the arrows. Oc. Yes, as long as the countries' governments are conservative. Od. Yes, as long as inflation is low. O e. No, because equilibrium prices never exist.
Antarctica Arctica Frozen fish Party ice Frozen fish Party ice (pounds per week) (pounds per week) 318 and 318 and 212 and 53 212 106 and and 106 and 106 106 212 and 159 and 318
The following is a table of two countries showing labor cost to produce Good A to Good J; A B C D E F G H I J Country I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Country II 288 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Assuming labor as the only cost and exchange rate is 1:1 ================ The goods that Country I will export Select one: a. diminishes in number and in volume/value b. diminishes in number but not necessarily in volume/value c. will make the country worse off immediately d. none of the above
Assume that Germany has 1200 units of labor available and it can produce two goods: apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. France has a labor force of 800. France’s unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. How many total units of apples and bananas will be produced in the world after trade?
Draw appropriate diagram(s) showing the following:A country (Germany) produces Wheat (W) and Steel (S).Germany has increasing costs.Before trade, Germany produces at a point P, where the internal exchange ratio is1 S = 1 W. Show diagrammatically, and explain thoroughly, whathappens if Germany has the opportunity to trade at 1 S = 2W . Identify all pertinent points and ideas clearly. Given theabove, reflect also on appropriate trade policy responses.