Courtney lived in Wyoming. On New Year’s Day she purchased a weight loss drug manufactured in Oklahoma by an Oklahoma Corporation, Ozzipic, Inc. Courtney learned of the drug from multiple advertisements on her local television station and in local newspapers. After suffering from a serious gastrointestinal illness, she sued Ozzipic in a Wyoming state court for $100,000. Ozzipic argued that Wyoming did not have personal jurisdiction over them because they were an Oklahoma corporation. How should the court rule
Courtney lived in Wyoming. On New Year’s Day she purchased a weight loss drug manufactured in Oklahoma by an Oklahoma Corporation, Ozzipic, Inc. Courtney learned of the drug from multiple advertisements on her local television station and in local newspapers. After suffering from a serious gastrointestinal illness, she sued Ozzipic in a Wyoming state court for $100,000. Ozzipic argued that Wyoming did not have personal jurisdiction over them because they were an Oklahoma corporation. How should the court rule?
Wyoming does not have personal jurisdiction over the Oklahoma defendants because an advertisement in a local paper does not amount to minimum contacts.
This case should be transferred to Federal Court based on Diversity Jurisdiction, as the plaintiff and defendant are from two different states and the plaintiff is seeking more than $75,000 in damages.
Wyoming has personal jurisdiction over the Oklahoma defendants because they made one sale in Oklahoma.
Wyoming has personal jurisdiction over the Oklahoma defendants because they had minimum contacts with that state by advertising there.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
