• Discrimination law o Brown v. Board of Education (1954) o Loving v. Virginia (1967) o Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) For each of the three cases presented, you must cover the following topics: • Background Information o Title of case oDate of case o Court(s) in which the case was ultimately decided o Type of case Facts of the case • Legal issue to be decided Contentions of BOTH parties in the case. Decision of the court and reasoning behind that decision. Implications of the verdict for either psychological practice, legal practice, law enforcement, or society in general The trick here is to make the cases accessible to everyone. Most court cases are filled with "legalese" (another name for legal terminology that is difficult to understand for non-lawyers). However, the hard part is converting the cases to plain language without dumbing down the content. Think to yourself "how would the average person need this case explained for them to understand it the first time they hear it. Remember, your listeners have not spent the time reviewing the cases that you have and only have one shot to hear, and understand, what happened.

• Discrimination law o Brown v. Board of Education (1954) o Loving v. Virginia (1967) o Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) For each of the three cases presented, you must cover the following topics: • Background Information o Title of case oDate of case o Court(s) in which the case was ultimately decided o Type of case Facts of the case • Legal issue to be decided Contentions of BOTH parties in the case. Decision of the court and reasoning behind that decision. Implications of the verdict for either psychological practice, legal practice, law enforcement, or society in general The trick here is to make the cases accessible to everyone. Most court cases are filled with "legalese" (another name for legal terminology that is difficult to understand for non-lawyers). However, the hard part is converting the cases to plain language without dumbing down the content. Think to yourself "how would the average person need this case explained for them to understand it the first time they hear it. Remember, your listeners have not spent the time reviewing the cases that you have and only have one shot to hear, and understand, what happened.