Game Theory and Strategic Choices - End of Chapter Problem Your instructor challenges you to solve this classic economics thought experiment called the stag hunt: Suppose you and a hunting partner are hunting for food to feed your families in a post-apocalyptic world with no stores, farms, or trade. You lay a trap for a deer that will provide a large number of calories for your two families to continue to survive. While waiting, you both spot a hare running through the trap. If you chase after the hare, you'll catch it but you will scare any wildlife in the area and you won't catch the deer you were waiting for. The hare only provides a small amount of calories for your own family and none for your partner's family. Use the payoff matrix to answer the question. You hunt the deer You hunt the hare Your friend hunts the deer Your payoff is 5 Your friend's payoff is 5 Your payoff is 2 Your friend's payoff is A Your friend hunts the hare Your payoff is A Your friend's payoff is 2 Your payoff is 1 Your friend's payoff is 1

Game Theory and Strategic Choices - End of Chapter Problem Your instructor challenges you to solve this classic economics thought experiment called the stag hunt: Suppose you and a hunting partner are hunting for food to feed your families in a post-apocalyptic world with no stores, farms, or trade. You lay a trap for a deer that will provide a large number of calories for your two families to continue to survive. While waiting, you both spot a hare running through the trap. If you chase after the hare, you'll catch it but you will scare any wildlife in the area and you won't catch the deer you were waiting for. The hare only provides a small amount of calories for your own family and none for your partner's family. Use the payoff matrix to answer the question. You hunt the deer You hunt the hare Your friend hunts the deer Your payoff is 5 Your friend's payoff is 5 Your payoff is 2 Your friend's payoff is A Your friend hunts the hare Your payoff is A Your friend's payoff is 2 Your payoff is 1 Your friend's payoff is 1

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two roommates John and Joe are playing a simultaneous game of cleaning the apartment. If neither of them clean, the apartment gets filthy and both get a utility of 2. If John cleans and Joe doesn’t, John gets a utility of 1 and Joe gets a utility of 4. If Joe cleans and John doesn’t, Joe gets a utility of 1 and John gets a utility of 4 and if both clean up the apartment, they each get a utility of 3.What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? Group of answer choices Joe cleans, John doesn’t John cleans, Joe doesn’t Both of them clean the apartment Neither of them clean the apartment
Suppose China and the US are deciding whether to join an international agreement to mitigate climate change. The matrix below contains payoffs that represent each country’s net benefit from their decisions. Use this information to answer Question 24. CHINA USA Join Agreement Do Not Join Agreement Join Agreement (100,100) (0,125) Do Not Join Agreement (125,0) (25,25) [24] What does each country decide to do in a Nash equilibrium? AND What is the efficient outcome? Nash: Efficient:
You have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.
Q3 Consider the following three-player normal form game (Player 3 is the page player): Player 3 A в Player 2 Player 2 A в A B 1,2, 3 в 2,3,1 Player 1 A Player 1 A 2, 1, 3 3, 2, 1 3, 2, 1 1,2, 3 в 1,3, 2 3, 1,2 For each player, strategies are A and B. a) Find the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of the above game. Assume now that the above game is played sequentially, with Player 3 moving first, Player 1 moving second, and Player 2 moving third. b) Write down the game tree. c) For each player, list all the available pure strategies. d) Find the subgame perfect equilibrium outcome and compare it with the equilibrium outcome you found in subquestion a). Comment.
Two roommates John and Joe are playing a simultaneous game of cleaning the apartment. If neither of them clean, the apartment gets filthy and both get a utility of 2. If John cleans and Joe doesn’t, John gets a utility of 1 and Joe gets a utility of 4. If Joe cleans and John doesn’t, Joe gets a utility of 1 and John gets a utility of 4 and if both clean up the apartment, they each get a utility of 3. If the apartment owner decides to fine both the roommates if the apartment is dirty, such that now if neither of them clean they each get a 5 utility loss, what would the new equilibrium be now? a. John cleans, Joe doesn’t b. Joe cleans, John doesn’t c. Neither of them clean the apartment d. Both A&B
Review Chapter 15, Table 15.4, Prisoner Dilemma. Suppose the game starts with both Jesse and Frank planning to “Stay Mum” in the lower right cell. Discuss how each player would evaluate the situation and decide whether to change decisions. If each player makes decisions to minimize the penalty, in which cell will this game end? Is there a Nash equilibrium?
Consider the following simultaneous move game: a. What is the maximum amount player 1 should be willing to pay for the opportunity to move first instead of moving at the same time as player 2? Explain carefully. b. What is the maximum amount player 2 should be willing to spend to keep player 1 from getting to move first?
Two roommates John and Joe are playing a simultaneous game of cleaning the apartment. If neither of them clean, the apartment gets filthy and both get a utility of 2. If John cleans and Joe doesn't, John gets a utility of 1 and Joe gets a utility of 4. If Joe cleans and John doesn't, Joe gets a utility of 1 and John gets a utility of 4 and if both clean up the apartment, they each get a utility of 3. Is the equilibrium efficient?
Table 15.4, Prisoner Dilemma. Suppose the game starts with both Jesse and Frank planning to “Stay Mum” in the lower right cell. Discuss how each player would evaluate the situation and decide whether to change decisions. If each player makes decisions to minimize the penalty, in which cell will this game end? Is there a Nash equilibrium?
QUESTION 4 Suppose there are 2 players in a non- cooperative game theory situation. Player A can move Up or Down while Player B can choose Left or Right. The following matrix contains the payoffs that each player receives under 4 scenarios. The first number in each cell refers to the payoffs for Player A. Player A Up Down A. B. C. 10, 60 D. 20, 80 Player B Suppose Player A moves first and Player B moves second. There is one equilibrium, Up, Left Left There is one equilibrium: Down, Right. 50, 90 40, 50 There are two equilibria, (Down, Left) and (Up, Right) Right There is one equilibrium in this game, Up Right
In Las Vegas, roulette is played on a wheel with 38 slots, of which 18 are black, 18 are red, and 2 are green (zero and double-zero). Your friend impulsively takes all $361 out of his pocket and bets it on black, which pays 1 for 1. This means that if the ball lands on one of the 18 black slots, he ends up with $722, and if it doesn't, he ends up with nothing. Once the croupier releases the ball, your friend panics; it turns out that the $361 he bet was literally all the money he has. While he is risk-averse - his utility function is u(x) =, where x is his roulette payoff - you are effectively risk neutral over such small stakes. a. When the ball is still spinning, what is the expected profit for the casino? b. When the ball is still spinning, what is the expected value of your friend's wealth? c. When the ball is still spinning, what is your friend's certainty equivalent (i.e., how much money would he accept with certainty to walk away from his bet). Say you propose the following…
Problem #4: Bayesian Nash Equilibrium Consider the following game, which has two states of nature shown in the two game tables below: "Harmful" (p = 1/3) "Helpful" (1-p = 2/3) Player 2 X Y 3, 2 Player 2 Y 2, 3 3, 2 1,0 0,1 A 0,1 3,2 A Player 1 Player 1 В 0,1 B a) Assume that Player 1 knows what the true state of nature is when playing this game, but Player 2 does not. Find all of the game's Bayesian Nash equilibria. (Hint: It may help to arrange the game tables appropriately.) b) Now, assume that Player 2 knows the true state of nature, but Player 1 does not. Find all of the game's Bayesian Nash equilibria.