please answer in text form and in proper format answer with must explanation , calculation for each part and steps clearly Professor Camara is trying to write aGame Theory question for the ECON 351final exam. He would like to construct anexample of a Prisoner's Dilemma game. Hecame up with the following table containingthe possible actions and payoffs of players 1and 2.However, he is having a hard time tryingto choose a payoff x for each player when bothplayers play "confess". For this game to be agood example of a Prisoner's Dilemma game,the missing payoff x of each player should bePlayer 2NotConfessConfessConfess х8"3018"Player 1Not1830 2525"Confess(A) x = -10(B) x = -5(C) x = 5(D) x = 15(E) x = 20

Explanation:- In the scenario of the Prisoners Dilemma, when individuals are incentivized to choose…

Answered: Professor Camara is trying to write a…

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following price game: Firm 1 Firm 2 High Low High 20, 20 12, 24 Low 24, 12 14, 14 Remark: In simultaneous move games (games with rows and columns) theconvention is to write the row player’s payoff first and the column player’spayoff second. (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? Recall that for each playeryou should find the best response to each of the opponents’ strategies andunderline the associated payoff. Then look for a cell where both strategiesare best responses to each other. This is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)?
Hi this is from a textbook. Thank you. Consider the following game in which Sally can play T or B and John chooses between L or R. Each player makes their choice simultaneously. If Sally chooses T and John chooses L, Sally gets a payoff of 5 and John has a payoff of 4. If Sally plays T and John R, Sally’s payoff is 8 and John gets 3. If Sally Chooses B and John L, the payoffs are 3 to Sally and 2 to John. Finally, if Sally chooses B and John R, the payoffs are 7 to Sally and 0 to John. Which statement is true? a) The Nash equilibrium is (B,R); this is a prisoners’ dilemma b) The Nash equilibrium is (T,R); this is a prisoners’ dilemma c) The Nash equilibrium is (T,R); this is not dominant strategy equilibrium d) The Nash equilibrium is (T,L); this is a dominant strategy equilibrium e) None of the above
The next 3 questions involve the following game. There are two players, a husband and wife. They can either be selfish (S) or selfless (U) in their marriage. If they choose to be selfish, then there is a negative ʻguilt’ payoff of g. The payoff matrix is below. Figure 1: The Marriage Game Wife S U S 10-g, 10-g 15-g, 2 U 2, 15-g 12, 12 Number left (right) of comma refers to H's (W's) payoff. 23. Suppose that g = 0. What is the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria)? (A) (S, S). (B) (U, S) and (S, U). (C) (S, S) and (U, U) (D) (U, U). 24. Suppose that g= 5. What is the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria)? (A) (S, S). (B) (U, S) and (S, U). (C) (S, S) and (U, U) (D) (U, U). 25. Suppose that g = 10. What is the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria)? (A) (S, S). (B) (U, S) and (S, U). (C) (S, S) and (U, U) (D) (U, U). Husband
2. Consider the following game. Two criminals are thinking about pulling off a bank robbery. The take from the bank would be $20,000 each, but the job requires two people (one to rob the bank and one to drive the getaway car. Each criminal could instead rob a liquor store. The take from robing a liquor store is only $1000 but can be done with one person acting alone. Write the payoff matrix of this game Player A Bank job Liqour store Player B Bank job Liquor store a. What are the Nash equilibria in this game? b. Explain why there can be multiple equilibria in this game. c. How the game will be played if mixed strategies are allowed? Discuss.
learn.canterbury.ac.nz Clasarsom Nov 15-ICO EUC LEARN | AKO See the game below and answer the questions 8 to 11: Player-1 C Player-2 X, Y Y Player-1 9 14 8. Player-2 16 17 16 Nash Equilibrium in this game: Select one: O a. Playert: C; Player2: X O b. Playert: C; Player2: Y Oc. Playert: L; Player2: X Od. Playert: L; Player2: Y e. None
Consider the extensive form game portrayed below. The top number at aterminal node is player 1’s payoff, the middle number is player 2’s payoff,and the bottom number is player 3’s payoff.a. Derive the strategy set for each player. (Note: If you do not want to listall of the strategies, you can provide a general description of a player’sstrategy, give an example, and state how many strategies are in thestrategy set.)b. Derive all subgame perfect Nash equilibria. c. Derive a Nash equilibrium that is not a SPNE, and explain why it isnot a SPNE.
3 0: she makes a pront of $9 An is ISK AVCise and aunty she makes. Let P be the probability that it rains the day of the concert. Find the number P tha makes Ann indifferent between organizing the concert in the Club or at the Park. 8. Compute the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the game below: Bungle F2 # Zippy E Left Right DOD F4 Up 2,-1 R I 20 F3 $ BAG 3 4 -2,0 HOT % 5 F5 Down 3,1 T 4,-2 VO MacBook Air 6 F6 Y & 7 F7 * U 8
20.38 C 1 Search il 4G O Microeconom... 1. In the sequential games such as the sequential Battle of the Sexes, why does the Nash equilibrium allow for outcomes with noncredible threats? 2. Left Right Up 1, 3 3, 1 Down 2, 2 4, 4 a. Find the Nash equilibrium or equilibria b. Which player, if any, has a dominant strategy? c. Does A benefit from changing the game by reducing his or her payoff in this way? 3. Noah and Xaviera love to play "Hide and Seek." It is a simple game, but it continues to amuse. It goes like this. Xaviera hides upstairs or downstairs. Noah can look upstairs or downstairs but not in both places. If he finds Xaviera, Noah gets one scoop of ice cream and Xaviera gets none. If he does not find Xaviera, Xaviera gets one scoop of ice cream and Noah gets none. a. Fill in the payoffs in the matrix below! Is this a zero-sum game? What are the Nash equilibria in pure strategies? Hide and Seek Xaviera Upstairs Downstairs Upstairs Noah Downstairs b. Find a Nash equilibrium in…
a. The president of a Japanese electronics company, Takashi Hashiyama, famously chose the auction housefor his company’s art collection by having representatives from two auction houses, Christie’s and Sotheby’s,play a round of rock-paper-scissors. At stake were millions of dollars in commissions. Show the payoff matrixfor a game where the payoff is 1 if you win, 0 if you tie, and -1 if you lose. I’m sure you know this already, butjust in case: rock breaks scissors, scissors cut paper, and paper smothers rock. Here’s an article about the actualgame if you’re interested. b. If you were in a high stakes game…
Consider the following game: Player 2 In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0 (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game? (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which? (c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?
Consider this as a simultaneous-move (static) game: Player A Top Bottom Player B Left Right ETEL UU 1.b) Does any player have a dominant strategy in this game? Explain. 1.a) Write down the Best Response Correspondence for each of the two players. Molimonsbestich Quinit 1.c) Find all Nash Equilibria in pure strategies of this game. 1.d) Is there any Nash Equilibria in mixed strategies? If so, find it. Elekt
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305971493

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Exploring Economics

Economics

ISBN:

9781544336329

Author:

Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:

SAGE Publications, Inc

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305971493

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Exploring Economics

Economics

ISBN:

9781544336329

Author:

Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:

SAGE Publications, Inc

Principles of Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781305156050

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Microeconomics: Principles & Policy

Economics

ISBN:

9781337794992

Author:

William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS