Prove 2 {y } = 5 2 {y} -y (o) the U definition of Laplace integral definition using transform: 2 {F 4)} = So°F (+) e ² st dt -Need Integration by parts

Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter6: Applications Of The Derivative
Section6.CR: Chapter 6 Review
Problem 37CR
icon
Related questions
Question

I started the problem but I am not sure if my math is right or if I am even on the right track.

Prove 2 {y }=$ 2{y} -y (o)
Using the integral definition of Laplace
transform: 2 {F (+)} = 50°F (t) e-st dt
-Need Integration by parts
St
L {y} = So y'e="dt dy vm-est
St
v=y' duže st
duży
t
y' l-est 116 - Sery de
y' (=-=-^"^) | ² +
yek
est
#tydt
L {y}
9 / ²115 + 152 {y}
Transcribed Image Text:Prove 2 {y }=$ 2{y} -y (o) Using the integral definition of Laplace transform: 2 {F (+)} = 50°F (t) e-st dt -Need Integration by parts St L {y} = So y'e="dt dy vm-est St v=y' duže st duży t y' l-est 116 - Sery de y' (=-=-^"^) | ² + yek est #tydt L {y} 9 / ²115 + 152 {y}
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,