Select one or more: a. A Pareto efficient outcome is where you cannot make anyone better off without someone else ending up worse off. b. All are happy with their share of income in a Pareto eﬃcient outcome. c. There is only ever one Pareto eﬃcient outcome. d. If two people have £100 to split, any split in which all the money is used up is Pareto-Efficient, even if one person gets none.

Select one or more: a. A Pareto efficient outcome is where you cannot make anyone better off without someone else ending up worse off. b. All are happy with their share of income in a Pareto eﬃcient outcome. c. There is only ever one Pareto eﬃcient outcome. d. If two people have £100 to split, any split in which all the money is used up is Pareto-Efficient, even if one person gets none.

Macroeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617390

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter1: What Economics Is About

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Hello can any one help with this Economics question: A restaurant serves two special dishes, A and B to its customers consisting of 60% men and 40% women. 80% of men order dish A and the rest B. 70% of women order B and the rest A. In what ratio of A to B should the restaurant prepare the two dishes ?
What is Pareto Improvement and Fairness in economic?
If an outcome is economically efficient, does this mean that everybody involved benefits? Why?
1. You are the coordinator of a nonprofit that distributes donated items to three local homeless shelters and want to figure out a way of distributing the donated items to the shelters who need it the most. Which of the following would most likely achieve your goal? Select the correct answer a. Send all the donations to the shelter that has the least. b. Divide the donations evenly among the three shelters. c. Ask shelters to submit their requests, and decide what to send where based on their answers. d. Offer each shelter a virtual "budget" and have them bid on different items. 1.1 Which of these best represent a planned approach and which best represent a market approach? Divide the answer into two groups (planned and Market approach) a. send all the donations to the sheller that has the least b. ask sellers to submit their request and decide what to send where based on their answers c. divide the donations evenly among the three shellers d. offer each sheller a…
Does the same principal-agent conflict exist when people donate other items such as bone marrow, blood, eggs, sperm? Please explain why or why not.
Battle of Sexes Answer the questions C and D only please:a. Find and explain all outcomes which are Pareto Efficient.b. Find all the possibilities of IEWDS equilibrium.c. Find all the pure NEs.d. Compare the result in (b) and (c), explain!
You go to the movieplex where movies ordinarily cost $9. You are intending to see a movie for which you have a $3 off coupon, which is good for only that movie at that time. However, when you get there you see a friend who asks if you would rather see a new release. Both movies start and end at the same time. If you decide to see the new release with your friend, what is your opportunity cost? a. The amount you value the first movie + $9 b. $3 c. The amount you value the first movie + $3 d. $9
Is it better to have a high or low dependency ratio?
Two athletes of equal ability are competing for aprize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to takea dangerous performance-enhancing drug. If oneathlete takes the drug and the other does not, the onewho takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neithertake the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking thedrug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a lossof X dollars.QuickQuiz Answers1. d 2. c 3. a 4. d 5. c 6. b 7. d 8. ba. Draw a 2×2 payoff matrix describing the decisionsthe athletes face.b. For what X is taking the drug the Nashequilibrium?c. Does making the drug safer (that is, lowering X)make the athletes better or worse off? Explain.
Why does knowing the facts help people maximize their choices
What are the likely consequences of not intervening?
1. How many people does it take to really communicate? Please explain. 2. In what other ways can you communicate with others? 3. Is it easier to communicate verbally or nonverbally? Why?