Suppose there exist two imaginary countries, Sequoia and Denali. Their labor forces are each capable of supplying four million hours per week that can be used to produce pistachios, chinos, or some combination of the two. The following table shows the amount of pistachios or chinos that can be produced by one hour of labor. Pistachios Chinos Country (Pounds per hour of labor) (Pairs per hour of labor) Sequoia 8 32 Denali 12 24 Suppose that initially Denali uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce pistachios and 3 million hours per week to produce chinos, while Sequoia uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce pistachios and 1 million hours per week to produce chinos. As a result, Sequoia produces 24 million pounds of pistachios and 32 million pairs of chinos, and Denali produces 12 million pounds of pistachios and 72 million pairs of chinos. Assume there are no other countries willing to engage in trade, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of pistachios and chinos it produces. Sequoia's opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pistachios is 4 pairs of chinos, and Denali's opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pistachios is 2 pairs of chinos. Therefore, Sequoia has a comparative advantage in the production of pistachios, and Denali ▼ has a comparative advantage in the production of chinos. Suppose that each country completely specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage, producing only that good. In this case, the country that produces pistachios will produce million pounds per week, and the country that produces chinos will produce million pairs per week. In the following table, enter each country's production decision on the third row of the table (marked "Production"). Suppose the country that produces pistachios trades 26 million pounds of pistachios to the other country in exchange for 78 million pairs of chinos. In the following table, select the amount of each good that each country exports and imports in the boxes across the row marked "Trade Action," and enter each country's final consumption of each good on the line marked "Consumption." When the two countries did not specialize, the total production of pistachios was 36 million pounds per week, and the total production of chinos was 104 million pairs per week. Because of specialization, the total production of pistachios has increased by million pounds per week, and the total production of chinos has increased by million pairs per week. Because the two countries produce more pistachios and more chinos under specialization, each country is able to gain from trade.

Principles of Economics 2e
2nd Edition
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Chapter1: Welcome To Economics!
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 10RQ: Give the three reasons that explain why the division of labor increases an economys level of...
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

Solve it on paper!!

 

Suppose there exist two imaginary countries, Sequoia and Denali. Their labor forces are each capable of supplying four million hours per week that
can be used to produce pistachios, chinos, or some combination of the two. The following table shows the amount of pistachios or chinos that can be
produced by one hour of labor.
Pistachios
Chinos
Country (Pounds per hour of labor) (Pairs per hour of labor)
Sequoia
8
32
Denali
12
24
Suppose that initially Denali uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce pistachios and 3 million hours per week to produce chinos, while
Sequoia uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce pistachios and 1 million hours per week to produce chinos. As a result, Sequoia produces 24
million pounds of pistachios and 32 million pairs of chinos, and Denali produces 12 million pounds of pistachios and 72 million pairs of chinos. Assume
there are no other countries willing to engage in trade, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount
of pistachios and chinos it produces.
Sequoia's opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pistachios is 4 pairs of chinos, and Denali's opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of
pistachios is 2 pairs of chinos. Therefore, Sequoia has a comparative advantage in the production of pistachios, and Denali ▼ has a
comparative advantage in the production of chinos.
Suppose that each country completely specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage, producing only that good. In
this case, the country that produces pistachios will produce
million pounds per week, and the country that produces chinos will produce
million pairs per week.
In the following table, enter each country's production decision on the third row of the table (marked "Production").
Suppose the country that produces pistachios trades 26 million pounds of pistachios to the other country in exchange for 78 million pairs of chinos.
In the following table, select the amount of each good that each country exports and imports in the boxes across the row marked "Trade Action," and
enter each country's final consumption of each good on the line marked "Consumption."
When the two countries did not specialize, the total production of pistachios was 36 million pounds per week, and the total production of chinos was
104 million pairs per week. Because of specialization, the total production of pistachios has increased by
million pounds per week, and the
total production of chinos has increased by
million pairs per week.
Because the two countries produce more pistachios and more chinos under specialization, each country is able to gain from trade.
Transcribed Image Text:Suppose there exist two imaginary countries, Sequoia and Denali. Their labor forces are each capable of supplying four million hours per week that can be used to produce pistachios, chinos, or some combination of the two. The following table shows the amount of pistachios or chinos that can be produced by one hour of labor. Pistachios Chinos Country (Pounds per hour of labor) (Pairs per hour of labor) Sequoia 8 32 Denali 12 24 Suppose that initially Denali uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce pistachios and 3 million hours per week to produce chinos, while Sequoia uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce pistachios and 1 million hours per week to produce chinos. As a result, Sequoia produces 24 million pounds of pistachios and 32 million pairs of chinos, and Denali produces 12 million pounds of pistachios and 72 million pairs of chinos. Assume there are no other countries willing to engage in trade, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of pistachios and chinos it produces. Sequoia's opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pistachios is 4 pairs of chinos, and Denali's opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of pistachios is 2 pairs of chinos. Therefore, Sequoia has a comparative advantage in the production of pistachios, and Denali ▼ has a comparative advantage in the production of chinos. Suppose that each country completely specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage, producing only that good. In this case, the country that produces pistachios will produce million pounds per week, and the country that produces chinos will produce million pairs per week. In the following table, enter each country's production decision on the third row of the table (marked "Production"). Suppose the country that produces pistachios trades 26 million pounds of pistachios to the other country in exchange for 78 million pairs of chinos. In the following table, select the amount of each good that each country exports and imports in the boxes across the row marked "Trade Action," and enter each country's final consumption of each good on the line marked "Consumption." When the two countries did not specialize, the total production of pistachios was 36 million pounds per week, and the total production of chinos was 104 million pairs per week. Because of specialization, the total production of pistachios has increased by million pounds per week, and the total production of chinos has increased by million pairs per week. Because the two countries produce more pistachios and more chinos under specialization, each country is able to gain from trade.
Without Trade
Production
Consumption
With Trade
Production
Trade action
Consumption
Gains from Trade
Increase in Consumption
Pistachios
(Millions of pounds)
24
24
Sequoia
0
Imports 26
Chinos
(Millions of pairs)
32
32
128
Exports 78
Pistachios
(Millions of pounds)
12
12
Denali
48
Exports 26
Chinos
(Millions of pairs)
72
72
0
Imports 78
Transcribed Image Text:Without Trade Production Consumption With Trade Production Trade action Consumption Gains from Trade Increase in Consumption Pistachios (Millions of pounds) 24 24 Sequoia 0 Imports 26 Chinos (Millions of pairs) 32 32 128 Exports 78 Pistachios (Millions of pounds) 12 12 Denali 48 Exports 26 Chinos (Millions of pairs) 72 72 0 Imports 78
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Trade
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax