The accompanying data were read from a plot (and are a subset of the complete data set) given in an article. The data represent the mean response times for a group of individuals with closed-head injury (CHI) and a matched control group without head injury on 10 different tasks. Each observation was based on a different study, and used different subjects, so it is reasonable to assume that the observations are independent. Mean Response Time Study Control CHI 1 250 302 2 360 490 3 475 658 4 525 684 5 610 922 6 740 1044 7 880 1421 8 920 1329 9 10 1010 1200 1481 1815 (a) Fit a linear regression model that would allow you to predict the mean response time for those suffering a closed-head injury from the mean response time on the same task for individuals with no head injury. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) y = + X (b) Do the sample data support the hypothesis that there is a useful linear relationship between the mean response time for individuals with no head injury and the mean response time for individuals with CHI? Test the appropriate hypotheses using α = 0.05. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) t = What is the P-value for this test? (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Round your answer to three decimal places.) P-value = What can you conclude? Do not reject Ho. We have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. Reject Ho. We have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. Reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. Do not reject Hò. We do not have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. (c) It is also possible to test hypotheses about the y intercept in a linear regression model. For these data, the null hypothesis Ho: a = 0 cannot be rejected at the 0.05 significance level, suggesting that a model with a y intercept of 0 might be an appropriate model. Fitting such a model results in an estimated regression equation of CHI = 1.48(Control). Interpret the estimated slope of 1.48. For any given task, people with no head injury are predicted to have a reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the reaction time for people with a closed-head injury. For any given task, people with no head injury are predicted to have an average reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the average reaction time for people with a closed- head injury. For any given task, people with a closed-head injury are predicted to have an average reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the average reaction time for people with no head injury. For any given task, people with a closed-head injury are predicted to have a reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the reaction time for people with no head injury.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.3: Measures Of Spread
Problem 1GP
icon
Related questions
Question

13.2.3

The accompanying data were read from a plot (and are a subset of the complete data set) given in an article. The data represent the mean response times for a group of individuals with
closed-head injury (CHI) and a matched control group without head injury on 10 different tasks. Each observation was based on a different study, and used different subjects, so it is
reasonable to assume that the observations are independent.
Mean Response Time
Study
Control
CHI
1
250
302
2
360
490
3
475
658
4
525
684
5
610
922
6
740
1044
7
880
1421
8
920
1329
9
10
1010
1200
1481
1815
(a) Fit a linear regression model that would allow you to predict the mean response time for those suffering a closed-head injury from the mean response time on the same task for
individuals with no head injury. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)
y =
+
X
(b) Do the sample data support the hypothesis that there is a useful linear relationship between the mean response time for individuals with no head injury and the mean response time
for individuals with CHI? Test the appropriate hypotheses using α = 0.05.
Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
t =
What is the P-value for this test? (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Round your answer to three decimal places.)
P-value =
Transcribed Image Text:The accompanying data were read from a plot (and are a subset of the complete data set) given in an article. The data represent the mean response times for a group of individuals with closed-head injury (CHI) and a matched control group without head injury on 10 different tasks. Each observation was based on a different study, and used different subjects, so it is reasonable to assume that the observations are independent. Mean Response Time Study Control CHI 1 250 302 2 360 490 3 475 658 4 525 684 5 610 922 6 740 1044 7 880 1421 8 920 1329 9 10 1010 1200 1481 1815 (a) Fit a linear regression model that would allow you to predict the mean response time for those suffering a closed-head injury from the mean response time on the same task for individuals with no head injury. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) y = + X (b) Do the sample data support the hypothesis that there is a useful linear relationship between the mean response time for individuals with no head injury and the mean response time for individuals with CHI? Test the appropriate hypotheses using α = 0.05. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) t = What is the P-value for this test? (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Round your answer to three decimal places.) P-value =
What can you conclude?
Do not reject Ho. We have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people
with a closed-head injury.
Reject Ho. We have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a
closed-head injury.
Reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people
with a closed-head injury.
Do not reject Hò. We do not have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for
people with a closed-head injury.
(c) It is also possible to test hypotheses about the y intercept in a linear regression model. For these data, the null hypothesis Ho: a = 0 cannot be rejected at the 0.05 significance
level, suggesting that a model with a y intercept of 0 might be an appropriate model. Fitting such a model results in an estimated regression equation of
CHI = 1.48(Control).
Interpret the estimated slope of 1.48.
For any given task, people with no head injury are predicted to have a reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the reaction time for people with a closed-head injury.
For any given task, people with no head injury are predicted to have an average reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the average reaction time for people with a closed-
head injury.
For any given task, people with a closed-head injury are predicted to have an average reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the average reaction time for people with no
head injury.
For any given task, people with a closed-head injury are predicted to have a reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the reaction time for people with no head injury.
Transcribed Image Text:What can you conclude? Do not reject Ho. We have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. Reject Ho. We have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. Reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. Do not reject Hò. We do not have convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between mean response time for people with no head injury and mean response time for people with a closed-head injury. (c) It is also possible to test hypotheses about the y intercept in a linear regression model. For these data, the null hypothesis Ho: a = 0 cannot be rejected at the 0.05 significance level, suggesting that a model with a y intercept of 0 might be an appropriate model. Fitting such a model results in an estimated regression equation of CHI = 1.48(Control). Interpret the estimated slope of 1.48. For any given task, people with no head injury are predicted to have a reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the reaction time for people with a closed-head injury. For any given task, people with no head injury are predicted to have an average reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the average reaction time for people with a closed- head injury. For any given task, people with a closed-head injury are predicted to have an average reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the average reaction time for people with no head injury. For any given task, people with a closed-head injury are predicted to have a reaction time that is 1.48 times as great as the reaction time for people with no head injury.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt