The authors of a paper on perceptions of video games carried out an experiment to determine if restrictive labels on video games actually increased the attractiveness of the game for young game players. Participants read a description of a new video game and were asked how much they wanted to play the game. The description also included an age rating. Some participants read the description with an age-restrictive label of 7+, indicating that the game was not appropriate for children under the age of 7. Others read the same description, but with an age-restrictive label of 12+, 16+, or 18+. The following data for 12- to 13-year-old boys are consistent with summary statistics given in the paper. (The sample sizes in the actual experiment were larger.) For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the boys were assigned at random to one of the four age label treatments (7+, 12+, 16+, and 18+). Data shown are the boys' ratings of how much they wanted to play the game on a scale of 1 to 10. 7+ label 6 7 6 5 12+ label 8 7 16+ label 7 9 18+ label 10 9 6 5 6 5 7 7 8 7 8 6 9 5 8 1 8 9 2 4 4 6 7 7 6 8 9 10 8 Do the data provide convincing evidence that the means of the ratings associated with the game descriptions by 12- to 13-year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. (Let M₁, M₂, M3, and μ4 be the true mean ratings of how much 12- to 13-year-old boys want to play the game on a scale of 1 to 10 for the four different age label treatments.)

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 4BGP
icon
Related questions
Question
The authors of a paper on perceptions of video games carried out an experiment to determine if restrictive labels on video games actually increased
the attractiveness of the game for young game players. Participants read a description of a new video game and were asked how much they wanted
to play the game. The description also included an age rating. Some participants read the description with an age-restrictive label of 7+, indicating
that the game was not appropriate for children under the age of 7. Others read the same description, but with an age-restrictive label of 12+, 16+,
or 18+. The following data for 12- to 13-year-old boys are consistent with summary statistics given in the paper. (The sample sizes in the actual
experiment were larger.) For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the boys were assigned at random to one of the four age label
treatments (7+, 12+, 16+, and 18+). Data shown are the boys' ratings of how much they wanted to play the game on a scale of 1 to 10.
7+ label 6 765 5
12+ label 8
16+ label 7
8 5
0⁰
7
6 7
18+ label 10 9 6 8 7
о но : H1 = M2 = μз =H4
8
3612
9
Ha : all four of the μ's are different
5
с
State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.
O Ho: all four of the µ's are different
На: М1=M2=μз=На
но: М1 = M2 = μз =H4
Ha at least two of the four μ's are different
6 8
оно : H1 = H2=μз = на
H₂ : at least three of the four μ's are different
5
Ho : at least two of the four μ's are different
На: М1 =M2 = μ3=14
8
8 9
9
4
Do the data provide convincing evidence that the means of the ratings associated with the game descriptions by 12- to 13-year-old boys is not the
same for all four restrictive rating labels? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. (Let µ₁, M₂, M3, and μ4 be the true
mean ratings of how much 12- to 13-year-old boys want to play the game on a scale of 1 to 10 for the four different age label treatments.)
6
4
7
Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
F =
7
10 8
Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
P-value =
State the conclusion in the problem context.
O We reject Ho. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-year-old boys is
not the same for all four restrictive rating labels.
O We fail to reject Ho. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-
year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels.
O We reject Ho. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-year-old
boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels.
O We fail to reject Ho. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-year-old
boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels.
Transcribed Image Text:The authors of a paper on perceptions of video games carried out an experiment to determine if restrictive labels on video games actually increased the attractiveness of the game for young game players. Participants read a description of a new video game and were asked how much they wanted to play the game. The description also included an age rating. Some participants read the description with an age-restrictive label of 7+, indicating that the game was not appropriate for children under the age of 7. Others read the same description, but with an age-restrictive label of 12+, 16+, or 18+. The following data for 12- to 13-year-old boys are consistent with summary statistics given in the paper. (The sample sizes in the actual experiment were larger.) For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the boys were assigned at random to one of the four age label treatments (7+, 12+, 16+, and 18+). Data shown are the boys' ratings of how much they wanted to play the game on a scale of 1 to 10. 7+ label 6 765 5 12+ label 8 16+ label 7 8 5 0⁰ 7 6 7 18+ label 10 9 6 8 7 о но : H1 = M2 = μз =H4 8 3612 9 Ha : all four of the μ's are different 5 с State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: all four of the µ's are different На: М1=M2=μз=На но: М1 = M2 = μз =H4 Ha at least two of the four μ's are different 6 8 оно : H1 = H2=μз = на H₂ : at least three of the four μ's are different 5 Ho : at least two of the four μ's are different На: М1 =M2 = μ3=14 8 8 9 9 4 Do the data provide convincing evidence that the means of the ratings associated with the game descriptions by 12- to 13-year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. (Let µ₁, M₂, M3, and μ4 be the true mean ratings of how much 12- to 13-year-old boys want to play the game on a scale of 1 to 10 for the four different age label treatments.) 6 4 7 Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) F = 7 10 8 Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O We reject Ho. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels. O We fail to reject Ho. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13- year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels. O We reject Ho. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels. O We fail to reject Ho. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description by 12- to 13-year-old boys is not the same for all four restrictive rating labels.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning