The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertilityCorn (bushels) Beef (kg)1000080009006000120040001400200014751500Which of the following events is likely to lead to an outward shift of the PPF?Select one;O a.Some of the land is lost due to a floodO b. None of the answers are correctO c. Corn prices fall relative to beef pricesO d. Twenty of the existing acres are not used for either beef or corn productiona reallocation of land use such that corn production increases from 6000 bushels to 8000 bushels while beefproduction decreases from 1200 kg to 900 kgO e.

Production possibility frontier shows the combination of production of two different goods at a…

The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertility Corn (bushels) Beef (kg) 10000 0. 8000 900 6000 1200 4000 1400 2000 1475 0. 1500 Which of the following events is likely to lead to an outward shift of the PPF? Select one; O a. Some of the land is lost due to a floo O b. None of the answers are correct O c. Corn prices fall relative to beef prices O d. Twenty of the existing acres are not used for either beef or corn production e. a reallocation of land use such that corn production increases from 6000 bushels to 8000 bushels while beef production decreases from 1200 kg to 900 kg

The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertility Corn (bushels) Beef (kg) 10000 0. 8000 900 6000 1200 4000 1400 2000 1475 0. 1500 Which of the following events is likely to lead to an outward shift of the PPF? Select one; O a. Some of the land is lost due to a floo O b. None of the answers are correct O c. Corn prices fall relative to beef prices O d. Twenty of the existing acres are not used for either beef or corn production e. a reallocation of land use such that corn production increases from 6000 bushels to 8000 bushels while beef production decreases from 1200 kg to 900 kg

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter2: Choice In A World Of Scarcity

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3SCQ: Could a nation be producing in a way that is allocatively efficient, but productively inefficient?

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertility Corn (bushels) Beef (kg) 10000 8000 900 6000 1200 4000 1400 2000 1475 1500 Which of the following events is likely to lead to an outward shift of the PPF? Select one: O a. Corn prices fall relative to beef prices O b. a reallocation of land use such that corn production increases from 6000 bushels to 8000 bushels while beef production decreases from 1200 kg to 900 kg O c. Some of the land is lost due to a flood O d. Twentyof the existing acres are not used for either beef or corn production O e. None of the answers are correct
EX LO d @ Safari File Edit View History Bookmarks Window Help Lily ✓ My Home Courses Rental Options V Catalog and Study Tools Dashboard College Success Tips Help Career Success Tips Give Feedback « 100 CENGAGE MINDTAP PISTACHIOS (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 Homework (Ch 03) The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Shenandoah and Denali. Both countries produce peas and pistachios, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 18 million pounds of peas and 9 million pounds of pistachios, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. 30 24 18 PPF 12 6 0 0 C Mind Tap - Cengage Learning 6 S Shenandoah A 12 18 24 30 PEAS (Millions of pounds) 36 42 48 ? JAN 28 PISTACHIOS (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 6 C MindTap - Cengage Learning 0 ng.cengage.com PPF 6 Denali A 12 18 24 30 36 PEAS (Millions of pounds) 42 48 Shenandoah has a comparative advantage in the production of while Denali has a comparative advantage in the…
The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertility Corn (bushels) Beef (kg) 10000 8000 6000 900 1200 4000 1400 2000 1475 0. 1500 Which of the following combination represents unattainable production levels with the current tract of land? Select one: O a. 8000 bushels of corn and 500 kg of beef O b. 200 bushels of corn and 1475 kg of beef O c. Both 8000 bushels of corn and 1200 kg of beef and 6000 bushels of corn and 1300 kg of beef O d. 8000 bushels of corn and 1200 kg of beef O e. 6000 bushels of corn and 1300 kg of beef
The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertility Corn (bushels) Beef (kg) 10000 8000 900 6000 1200 4000 1400 2000 1475 1500 The production possibilities shown for corn and beef mean that the PPF Select one: O a. is concave because the total amount of beef increases as less corn is produced O b. is concave because the opportunity cost of corn falls as more corn is produced is concave because the opportunity cost of beef increases as more beef is produced O d. is a straight line because the change in corn is 2000 bushels all along
The table below represents the combinations of beef and corn produced on a tract of land of a given size and fertility Corn (bushels) Beef (kg) 10000 0 8000 900 6000 1200 4000 1400 2000 1475 0 1500 Which of the following events is likely to lead to an outward shift of the PPF? Select one: O a. a reallocation of land use such that corn production increases from 6000 bushels to 8000 bushels while beef production decreases from 1200 kg to 900 kg Corn prices fall relative to beef prices Some of the land is lost due to a flood None of the answers are correct Twenty of the existing acres are not used for either beef or corn production O b. O c. O d. e.
Wichita — Farmers in Kansas, the biggest US producerof wheat, are abandoning their crops damaged by severedrought and cold.Some are spraying wheat fields with crop-killingchemicals and claiming insurance payouts in the beliefthat it is not worth harvesting the little grain that thereis, Reuters found on a three-day tour of the state. Othergrowers let cattle graze on the dismal-looking fields.Abandoning fields will reduce the crop of the world’sfifth-largest wheat exporter, with stocks expected to fallto a 16-year low. Large-scale abandonment deals aneconomic blow to farm towns and force wheat buyersto adjust procurement plans by buying the staple grainelsewhere.Nationally, winter-wheat farmers plan to abandon 33%of the acres they planted, the highest percentage sinceWorld War 1, the US department of agriculture said ina May 12 report.Kansas farmers are expected to abandon about 19% ofthe area planted last autumn, up from 10% in 2022 and4% in 2021, according to the report. But farmers,…
Wichita — Farmers in Kansas, the biggest US producerof wheat, are abandoning their crops damaged by severedrought and cold.Some are spraying wheat fields with crop-killingchemicals and claiming insurance payouts in the beliefthat it is not worth harvesting the little grain that thereis, Reuters found on a three-day tour of the state. Othergrowers let cattle graze on the dismal-looking fields.Abandoning fields will reduce the crop of the world’sfifth-largest wheat exporter, with stocks expected to fallto a 16-year low. Large-scale abandonment deals aneconomic blow to farm towns and force wheat buyersto adjust procurement plans by buying the staple grainelsewhere.Nationally, winter-wheat farmers plan to abandon 33%of the acres they planted, the highest percentage sinceWorld War 1, the US department of agriculture said ina May 12 report.Kansas farmers are expected to abandon about 19% ofthe area planted last autumn, up from 10% in 2022 and4% in 2021, according to the report. But farmers,…
Could a nation be producing in a way that is allocatively efficient, but productively inefficient?
Chile's Production Possibilities Frontier Colombia's Production Possibilities Frontier ↑soydeans TEx pounds) ↑ soydeans 20 (in pounds) 18 18 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 6 4- +%> 16 18 20 coffee (in pounds 2 4 8 10 12 14 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 coffee spunod ng) Refer to Figure 3-8. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one day of production, then which of the following combinations of pounds of coffee and pounds of soybeans could Chile and Colombia together not make in a given day? O a. 4 pounds of coffee and 17 pounds of soybeans O b. 8 pounds of coffee and 14 pounds of soybeans O . 16 pounds of coffee and 9 pounds of soybeans O d. 24 pounds of coffee and 3 pounds of soybeans
The budget constraint model and the production possibilities frontier (PPF) model both illustrate (select ALL that apply): O allocative efficiency O productive effieciency O a curved line to represent both the budget constraint and the PPF the tradeoffs in choosing more of one good at the cost of less of the other O comparative advantage O constraints on what we can have due to scarce resources
Country A Country B Textiles 4 4 Soybeans 4 5 The numbers in the table indicate the number of hours required to produce 1 unit of the good What is pT in Autarky? O 1 in Country A 4/5 in Country B 4wA in Country A 4wB in Country B O4 in Country A 4 in Country B O 1 in Country A 5/4 in Country B
Point A B C D E Production chocolate bars 0 10 20 30 40 Production cans of cola 100 90 70 40 0 The above table shows production points on Sweet - Tooth Land's production possibilities frontier. Which of the following is an example of a point that is inefficient? A. 0 chocolate bars and 100 cans of cola OB. 38 chocolate bars and 0 cans of cola OC. 32 chocolate bars and 40 cans of cola OD. 20 chocolate bars and 80 cans of cola MEEDI