To determine the relative effectiveness of different study strategies for the SAT, suppose three groups of students are randomly selected: One group took the SAT without any prior studying; the second group took the SAT after studying on their own from a common study booklet available in the bookstore; and the third group took the SAT after completing a paid summer study session from a private test-prep company. The means and standard deviations of the resulting SAT scores from this hypothetical study are summarized below: Group 1 (no study) ܐ ܕܝܐܕ ܬܐ:H Group 2 (personal study) Group 3 (paid preparation) The following hypotheses were tested: H₁: H₁ = = H, and 1₂ are not all equal Group ECCOE Total M 12 DF 2 30 32 12 SS 625.2 820.7 1445.9 9 Analysis of Variance for SAT X 1014.1 Since we are comparing more than 2 groups, we will use ANOVA to test whether the data provide evidence that SAT score is related to study strategy. The analysis was run on the data and the following output was obtained: 1015.8 1023.7 MS 312.6 27.4 S 4.9 11,43 5.1 5.7 0.000 Which of the following is a valid conclusion based on the output? Check all that apply. A. The data provide strong evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy. B. The data provide strong evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy in the following way: The mean SAT score for students who pay for coaching is higher than the mean SAT score for students who study themselves, which in turn is higher than that of students who do not study for the test. C. The data provide strong evidence that the three mean SAT scores (representing the three learning strategies) are not all equal. D. The data do not provide sufficient evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy.
To determine the relative effectiveness of different study strategies for the SAT, suppose three groups of students are randomly selected: One group took the SAT without any prior studying; the second group took the SAT after studying on their own from a common study booklet available in the bookstore; and the third group took the SAT after completing a paid summer study session from a private test-prep company. The means and standard deviations of the resulting SAT scores from this hypothetical study are summarized below: Group 1 (no study) ܐ ܕܝܐܕ ܬܐ:H Group 2 (personal study) Group 3 (paid preparation) The following hypotheses were tested: H₁: H₁ = = H, and 1₂ are not all equal Group ECCOE Total M 12 DF 2 30 32 12 SS 625.2 820.7 1445.9 9 Analysis of Variance for SAT X 1014.1 Since we are comparing more than 2 groups, we will use ANOVA to test whether the data provide evidence that SAT score is related to study strategy. The analysis was run on the data and the following output was obtained: 1015.8 1023.7 MS 312.6 27.4 S 4.9 11,43 5.1 5.7 0.000 Which of the following is a valid conclusion based on the output? Check all that apply. A. The data provide strong evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy. B. The data provide strong evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy in the following way: The mean SAT score for students who pay for coaching is higher than the mean SAT score for students who study themselves, which in turn is higher than that of students who do not study for the test. C. The data provide strong evidence that the three mean SAT scores (representing the three learning strategies) are not all equal. D. The data do not provide sufficient evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy.
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.3: Measures Of Spread
Problem 1GP
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:X
mu.edu/jcourse/a2/rest/assessement/deliver?context=930157f80a000031298519e52c4ce3b6&attempt=2
+
22 Google Calendar
@
2
14/
#3
OneDrive
To determine the relative effectiveness of different study strategies for the SAT, suppose three
groups of students are randomly selected: One group took the SAT without any prior studying;
the second group took the SAT after studying on their own from a common study booklet available in the bookstore;
and the third group took the SAT after completing a paid summer study session from a private test-prep company.
The means and standard deviations of the resulting SAT scores from this hypothetical study are summarized below:
ܕܠܐ
C
L
Yuzu textbook
54
Group 1
(no study)
$
MBC C chegg Drive ACCT 211
Countdown: Days:-4 Time:-03:46:33
Group 2
(personal study)
Group
Error
Total
U
Group 3
(paid preparation)
21
12
The analysis was run on the data and the following output was obtained:
12
9
Analysis of Variance for SAT
DF
2
30
32
SS
625.2
820.7
1445.9
%
5
Since we are comparing more than 2 groups, we will use ANOVA to test whether the data provide evidence that SAT
score is related to study strategy.
The following hypotheses were tested:
H₁: M₁ == μ₁
H: H₁, H₂, and μ, are not all equal
T
X
1014.1
G Search or type URL
1015.8
1023.7
A
MS
312.6
27.4
6
Which of the following is a valid conclusion based on the output? Check all that apply.
A. The data provide strong evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy.
B. The data provide strong evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy in the following way: The
mean SAT score for students who pay for coaching is higher than the mean SAT score for students who study
themselves, which in turn is higher than that of students who do not study for the test.
F
11.43
C. The data provide strong evidence that the three mean SAT scores (representing the three learning
strategies) are not all equal.
D. The data do not provide sufficient evidence that SAT scores are related to learning strategy.
MacBook Pro
3
4.9
5.1
5.7
w ECON-chpt. 14.
P
0.000
&
7
*
8
(
(*
9
Q Û ☆
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
