Would it be possible to bring extinct species back? In an article it was expressed how brinng extinct species back is still very futuristic, and we should aim at a smaller creature. Using a smaller sized species like the Christmas rat can set up scientists for potentially larger species. There is a major issue that comes up and that is incomplete genes. It makes it difficult to even compare modern day rat to the Christmas rats' genome because their genes are specialized and as more time passes, the harder it is to have a match. The article also talked about using modern day elephants to make a woolly elephant, meaning they don't want a perfect match. Rather, scientists want to make hybrids since it could be more realistic.

Would it be possible to bring extinct species back? In an article it was expressed how brinng extinct species back is still very futuristic, and we should aim at a smaller creature. Using a smaller sized species like the Christmas rat can set up scientists for potentially larger species. There is a major issue that comes up and that is incomplete genes. It makes it difficult to even compare modern day rat to the Christmas rats' genome because their genes are specialized and as more time passes, the harder it is to have a match. The article also talked about using modern day elephants to make a woolly elephant, meaning they don't want a perfect match. Rather, scientists want to make hybrids since it could be more realistic.

Human Biology (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781305112100

Author:Cecie Starr, Beverly McMillan

Publisher:Cecie Starr, Beverly McMillan

Chapter23: Principles Of Evolution

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5SQ

See similar textbooks

Would it be possible to bring extinct species back?

In an article it was expressed how brinng extinct species back is still very futuristic, and we should aim at a smaller creature. Using a smaller sized species like the Christmas rat can set up scientists for potentially larger species. There is a major issue that comes up and that is incomplete genes. It makes it difficult to even compare modern day rat to the Christmas rats' genome because their genes are specialized and as more time passes, the harder it is to have a match. The article also talked about using modern day elephants to make a woolly elephant, meaning they don't want a perfect match. Rather, scientists want to make hybrids since it could be more realistic.

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

This is a popular solution!

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1: Definition of extinct species

VIEW

Step 2: Possibility of bringing back extinct species

VIEW

Solution

VIEW

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

The fact that DNA sequences are more similar in more closely related organisms is evidence of what? a. optimal design in organisms b. adaptation c. mutation d. descent with modification
Example 3The Basque people, who have a distinct language, live on the coastal border of France and Spain. The 700,000 modern Basques had long been thought to descend from hunter-gatherers who lived in the area about 7,500 years ago, before the first farmers arrived. DNA told a different story. Researchers compared the genome sequences of bones from eight Basque farmers who had lived in a cave in northern Spain from 5,500 to 3,500 years ago to genomes from other skeletons representing severalEuropean hunter-gatherers and early farming groups, as well as to modern Europeans. While the ancient farmers had genomes representing many groups, including those of hunter-gatherers, the Basques indeed have a unique genome – but one that descends from the earliest farmers, not from hunter-gatherers. Apparently, their uniqueness today is due to their self-imposed isolation as the rest of Europe interbred. Source: Lewis, Ricki. Human Genetics Concepts and Applications (2018). Twelfth edition.…
Much research has been done in the cloning of animals; a tadpole in 1954, Dolly the sheep in 1997, and the endangered gaur are just a few of the "famous" cloned animals. However, cloning of animals has met with limited success. Which statement is a scientific argument against the cloning of animals? Animals on the endangered species list could be cloned, and their populations A would increase. Most cloned animals have a compromised immune system and have a low survival rate. Cloning of animals can be beneficial in the treatment and prevention of many diseases. New technologies and scientific equipment have made cloning of animals safe.
How might an evolutionary biologist explain why a species of salamander becomes blind after colonizing a cave? Group of answer choices Members of the ancestral population that colonized the cave differed in their ability to see. If maintaining the ability to see in the cave was a waste of energy, blind salamanders might actually have more offspring than those who could see. It is possible that in the cave there is a source of pollution that increases the mutation rate for a gene that makes salamanders blind. Over time, due to exposure to this chemical, the membersof the population lose their sight. There is no way to explain this in terms of natural selection. The members of this salamander species no longer needed to use their eyes. Over time, due to lack of use, they lost the ability to see.
Which statement about genome evolution is false? Mutations at the ends of introns are less likely than in the middle of an intron. Synonymous mutations rates are much higher than nonsynonymous mutation rates. Psuedogenes show high rates of mutations. Comparison of the mutational change in a specific gene can be used as a molecular clock to date evolutionary events between species. Evolution in a gene sequence will occur the fastest in regions that have the greatest effect on function.
From mosquitoes preserved in amber The scientists took DNA codes from which animal to complete the DNA 10 strands to recreate the dinosaurs? * snake O frog O chicken How did the scientists try to prevent the dinosaurs from breeding in the wild? *
Evolutionary theory predicts that species are related, not independent. Four of the following examples provide support for this prediction, but one is irrelevant. Which of examples listed below does not support the claim that species are related? O A. Many dinosaurs and other organisms went extinct following a huge asteroid impact at the end of the Cretaceous. O B. All prokaryotes and eukaryotes use DNA to carry their genetic information. OC. Before synthetic insulin was available, diabetics used injections of purified pig insulin to manage their disease. O D. Ground squirrel species found on the North and South sides of the Grand Canyon are very similar to each other. O E. The endostyle of lancelets (invertebrate chordates) and the thyroid gland of vertebrates develop similarly, and both produce iodinated proteins. «< Question 5 of 120 A Moving to another question will save this response. 11:51 AM 12/16/202 End F10 pgUP F11 PgDn F12 Home PrtScn F8 DII F5 F7 F6 F3 F4 F2 & #3 2$ 7 8 9.…
Birds and butterflies have wings they use for flying. The wings of butterflies are made of semitransparent, tough scales. Bird wings are covered with feathers. The wings of birds and butterflies did not evolve from a common ancestor that had wings. Instead, they have evolved as a result of similar environmental pressures. Which statement best explains the evolutionary relationship of birds and butterflies? Bird and butterfly wings are a result of divergent evolution because birds and butterflies did not evolve from a winged common ancestor. Bird and butterfly wings are a result of convergent evolution because birds and butterflies evolved from a winged common ancestor. Bird and butterfly wings are analogous structures because they have similar functions, are structurally different, and are a result of convergent evolution. Bird and butterfly wings are homologous structures because they have similar functions, are structurally the same, and are a result of divergent evolution.
Why are fruit flies good subjects with which to observe the process of evolution through natural selection? Fruit flies are good subjects because they have very long generations, and scientists can control their development over long periods of time. Fruit flies are good subjects because they have short generations and scientists can control their development in the lab. Fruit flies change into different species of flies each generation, so they have more features to study. Fruit flies are K-strategists, and these are easier to study over short periods of time.
Many plants (and some animals) have defensive chemicals to protect themselves from predation. How did these compounds evolve? Choose All That Apply there was a mutation in an existing gene that resulted in a new enzyme function Oa different (or slightly altered) compound was made that was slightly toxic to other organisms plants/animals with the toxic compound were eaten less there was a mutation in a gene as a result of the plant/animal being eaten presence of the toxic compound reduced the fitness of the plant/animal the gene that codes for the enzyme that produces the toxic compound became more prevalent
Need help what is the difference between a gene tree and a species tree? Explain in your own words how it is possible for gorillas and humans to share a genetic trait (such as a retroviral insertion) that chimpanzees do not share, if chimpanzees and humans are really each other's closest relatives. Given the lack of agreement between gene trees and species trees, how is it possible to reconstruct the true species tree?
If you found the same gene in all organisms you test, what could this suggest about the evolution of this gene in the history of life on earth? What if a gene is very similar in most species that you study, but quite different in a particular group? What if it’s present in nearly everything, but the specific sequences vary quite a bit?