Dog park

In the first passage " A Dog Park Benefits All", they are stating their opinion for a need for a dog park. Stating that rental units make up at least 68 percent of the cities residents. Leaving them with little to no private yard space to accomodate pet owners needs. Also they state that lack of exercise and socialization negatively effects dogs. The second passage "No Dog Park for Muscatine", is clearly against having a dog park in the community. Their opinion is that it is a waste of

Dog parks should be built in cities! Lets take a second to think about this... If there are no dog parks in cities they are either trapped in the house and/or connected to a leash. In the city it is all streets and cars and there is nowhere to play with your dog legally. I look at my dog as part of the family and hate putting her on a leash because it can choke them if they try runnning and like "A Dog Park Benefits All" states, "Exercise is important to dogs' mental and physical health.". Dogs love

Dog parks in the city would help dogs get daily excercise and it would help them get in shape and it would also help to calm them down beacuse it is proven that dogs that get daiy ecercise tends to be more playful,less noisy,and isin't mean. but the cost of building a dog park would cost up to 70,000$ just for the fence thats not including a building permit and all the work. Most dogs would benifit from having a local dog park but the federal cost of funding a dog park would be outrageous even though

As was said in the passage having a dog park aound is a good thing. Dogs are like humans,they need their excerise and social time too. If a dog doesnt get the right amount of excerise the dog will act out. This means chewing on things more than usual,going potty where they know theyre not suposed to and eating less. Having a park specifically for that reason would be great. Lees summit has their own dog park nearby and Ive taken my dogs a time or two. I have a Steel Nose Pitbull and a Chow. The

Dog parks have been a beneficial asset to a lot of communities while at the same time, a nuisance. Tons of dog owners believe building dog parks have more positives than negatives. They believe exercise is important to a dogs' mental and physical health. Dog owners often release their dogs in emtpy lots and city parks which can be potentially dangerous for other dogs and other people. Building a park would allow dogs to have better social skills, and wreck havoc outside instead of in homes. Less

looking at the Alton Baker Dog Park near Autzen Stadium. The reason why I chose this place was because of its activity levels and diversity among its users. It seems no matter when I bike near the park, I always find dogs running around, while the owners are interacting with both their companions and other people as well. It is a great opportunity to view people getting a break from their busy lives. It’s also a place of happiness and relaxation as, who doesn’t love dogs? The demographic that I am

styled dog parks across the United States of America have brought much debate and unrest within communities. Cities and neighborhoods that do not provide these types of dog parks make it difficult for pet owners to provide exercise, social activities, and a place where dog and dog owners grow and learn together. Park and recreation advocates question the public advocacy on the assets and location in construction for the dog park. Other locals are against the idea of off-leash style dog parks due to

Dog parks are a staple of urban and suburban areas, a place where dog owners can congregate and converse about the local gossip, or goings-on about the neighborhood. Over the past 12 months, a group of people have come together to propose allocating land for a dog park in Weston and tensions are running high. Surprisingly, the dog park has met with a strong degree of controversy. For the better part of the last year, there have been multiple hearings involving the dog park. The latest meeting occurred

of Muscatine, Iowa there is a debate going on. A debate on whether a dog park spanning over one acre of land should be built or not. It is very important for dogs to run and play for mutiple reasons. Resons such as to release all that extra energy they have aslo, excercise is shown to lower bad behavior in dogs, but this dog park is not a good idea. Taxpayers which are all of us will be funding the construction of this dog park. As stated in the passage it will cost over $70,000 just to bulit the

Crowded living spaces and not much greenary. If you're a dog owner, you would think you would go ahead and knock places like that off of your house hunting list. Dogs do need space to run and play, but building a dog park in a smaller area doesn't seem too ideal. If you're going to own a pet, take into consideration the space needed and responsibilities at hand, especially a dog. Stated in the first "beneficial" dog park passage, it is said that dogs become aggressive and can cause more issues if they