Resolved: Telling Stewart about Waksal is unethical.
1. The key parties of this situation would be Stewart and myself. Even though I think telling Stewart about Waksal is unethical, following Baconivic’s orders and telling her would put her at an advantage because she would be able to sell her ImClone stocks before the rest of the shareholders could. Even though she could use the Waksal information for her advantage, she would be putting herself in jeopardy with the law. Following Baconivic’s orders would also make me look better in front of him and he could possibly help me get a higher positioned job in the future. For myself, if I know telling Stewart is unethical and I still do it, I am going against my own moral values. By doing
…show more content…
4. The argument that I am making should be addressed to Baconivic and the people that agree with his business ethics. Instead of having a Carr mindset, I have more of a Drucker mindset. With my Drucker mindset, I would address Baconivic and these people about how spreading insider information to only a select few is against the law and how it could ruin their image as people in the working field. No matter whether you are a senior broker or assistant, ruining your image in the working field does no good to anyone. All their hard work up to that point will diminish and trying to gain back a good reputation will be difficult. As many parents tell their children, Baconivic and his supporters should put themselves in the shoes of other shareholders that will fairly lose money from their investments in the ImClone company. By doing so, they will be able to mentally see and feel the loss that happens through stocks. Instead of trying to give certain people unfair advantages, higher authoritative positions in companies should be more ethical and try to give reassurance that the stocks will raise
During the nineteenth century, slavery widely accepted in the United States. Although the freedoms of “all men” were supposedly given in America by the Declaration of Independence, these rights did not expand to blacks who were free or under the confines of slavery. At the time, it was illegal for colored people to learn to read and for anyone to teach them. Because of this, very few people who were enslaved could read or write. Fredrick Douglas, who was born a slave around the year 1818, is the author of one of the only books of the time written by a black man, especially by a former slave. The book titled A Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglas, an American Slave, Written by Himself was
As Abraham Lincoln once said, " Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." The people who do not allow others to have their rights, do not deserve the rights they are withholding. This applies during the American Renaissance. This time period was filled with women's rights speakers, black's rights speakers, and authors who right on the topic of society's responsibility for the homeless and poor. Frederick Douglass argues for black's rights, Herman Melville discusses how the homeless are treated in society, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton fights for the equality of men and women. The author and speakers all focus on the issue of moral struggle and social justice and fight for what they believe is right.
In this excerpt from Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Frederick Douglass employs three distinct styles in each of the paragraphs. Paragraphs one and two have a somewhat similar style, while the style in paragraph three is drastically different. Douglass is released from his need to tell and simply shows us his internal dialogue in the third paragraph. The literary devices he uses to help make this contrast are distinct. Douglass moves away from an organized, intellectual style to a more lurching, frantic one. This change in styles is extremely effective in furthering Douglass’s rhetorical purpose, which is to evoke disgust in slavery. Douglass tells his story in the first two paragraph, but reveals the inner workings of his mind in paragraph three. This shows how being a slave impacted his psyche. Douglass shows his mind, one of a damaged, desperate slave. This is extremely effective. Douglass provides yet another window through which to look and discover horrors of slavery through the impact of it on the state of one’s mind.
1. Why didn’t the SEC accuse Mark Cuban of traditional illegal insider trading, considering he was the largest, individual shareholder of Mamma.com?
In today’s day and age education is one of the most overlooked concept of our generation. Education is underestimated because it’s easily accessed through public or at home schooling, so the majority of our generation can at least read or write. In the narrative The Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass the concept of education can differentiate whether a black man free or enslaved. During this time period, education is crucial for the road of freedom but extremely difficult to achieve. In this narrative Douglas uses paradox to show how education can be an african american’s ‘saving grace’ but on the other hand, it could also be his worst nightmare. This is shown through the process Frederick Douglas needed to go through to become education and free. Douglas utilizes irony and character development to display this duality of education.
1). In 1935 Douglas ran federally for the CCF and won a seat representing the Weyburn
Slavery was perhaps one of the most appalling tragedies in the history of The United States of America. To tell the people of the terrible facts, runaway slaves wrote their accounts of slavery down on paper and published it for the nation to read. Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs were just two of the many slaves who did this. Each of the slaves had different experiences with slavery, but they all had one thing in common: they tell of the abominable institution of slavery and how greatly it affected their lives. When Douglass was seven years old, he was sent to a new master and mistress, Hugh and Sophia Auld. Sophia was a very kind and affectionate woman, probably one of the nicest people Douglass
The purpose behind Fredrick Douglass’s Narrative was to appeal to the other abolitionists who he wanted to convince that slave owners were wrong for their treatment of other human beings. His goal was to appeal to the middle-class people of that time and persuade them to get on board with the abolitionist movement. Douglass had a great writing style that was descriptive as well as convincing. He stayed away from the horrific details of the time, which helped him grasp the attention of the women who in turn would convince their husbands to help by donating money and eventually ending slavery. He used his words effectively in convincing the readers that the slave owners were inhuman and showed how they had no feelings for other human
Douglas takes an amoral stance upon the question of slavery within the union and is indifferent to the spread of it. He invokes a principle of popular sovereignty, allowing the American people to vote upon slavery. Popular sovereignty embraces a state of indifference, which does not spread nor exclude slavery within the union, but rather allows the people to decide and form laws upon it. Lincoln argued,
Slaves didn’t know their mothers or birthdays. Assess the impact on their mental well being ?
Through the use of first person encounters, Frederick Douglass in his narrative “A Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” argues that the key to freedom is claimed through education. He introduces this idea after his beginning steps in becoming educated and later reinforces it by providing extensive examples of his experience with; slave-masters, learning the alphabet, reading and writing, and the exposition of individual opinions in literature.
Prompt: Douglass maintains that slavery dehumanized both the slave and the slaveholder. Quoting specific passages in the Narrative support this thesis with examples.
During the 1800s, slaves received treatment comparable to that of livestock. They were mere possessions of white men stripped of almost every last bit of humanity in them. African-Americans were constricted to this state of mind by their owners vicious treatment, but also the practice of keeping them uneducated. Keeping the slaves illiterate hindered them from understanding the world around them. Slave owners knew this. The slaves who were able to read and write always rebelled more against their masters. Frederick Douglass, author of "A Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass," and Harriet Jacobs, author of "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl," were prime examples. Both slaves had been taught how read and write at a young
Frederick Douglas in his discourse, "What to the Slaves, Is the Fourth of July", expressively sets up the deceptions predominant in American culture amid the 1800 's. He was made a request to give a discourse at an abolitionist servitude meeting amid a Fourth of July festivity, and he accepted that open door to dishearten the foundation of subjection. He esteemed it double-dealing for the abolitionist subjugation constituents to request that he convey such a discourse. Considering he was, a dark man and got away slave it appeared to Douglas a little oxymoronic to talk on this specific occasion. Nonetheless, the occasion made the ideal kairos for him to present his contention: why ought to Dark Americans, free or other savvy, praise the
In the autobiography Frederick Douglass presents a clear picture to me of a horrifying period of American history that far too few people understand. Douglass’s personal narrative as a slave lets you feel the fear of his past and allows us to experience the suffering and pain inflicted by underserved beatings and an unhealthy lifestyle with too much physical exertion. Douglass expresses very personal feelings about his history and helps us to understand the intense hatred and disgust the American slave had for his possessor, and the sickness of hate that allowed human beings to keep other human being as slaves.