Hansson Private Label case

10. What is the net present value (NPV) of a long-term investment project? Describe how managers use NPVs when evaluating capital budget proposals.

Finally, in order to complete a more accurate comparison between the two projects, we utilized the EANPV as the deciding factor. Under current accepted financial practice, NPV is generally considered the most accurate method of predicting the performance of a potential project. The duration of the projects is different, one lasts four years and one lasts six years. To account for the variation in time frames for the projects and to further refine our selection we calculated the EANPV to compare performance on a yearly basis.

The relatively well posed project with promises of great future pay offs must be examined closely nevertheless to determine its true profitability. As such, the Super Project’s NPV must be calculated, however before we proceed we must acknowledge the relevant cash flows. The project incurred an expense of testing the market. This expense, however, must not be included in our cash flow analysis because it can be considered a sunk cost. This expense is required for ‘taking a temperature’ of the market and will not be recovered. Other sources of cash flow include:

Evaluating the risks, calculating the probability of success, and factoring in the projected profit from sales will provide a clearer NPV to be compared with other projects in the

This project is to identify and analyze HPL (Hansson Private Label ) company’s new investment decisions based on a series of calculations include: Operating Cash Flows (OCF), Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Sensitivity Analysis. The analysis suggests that Hansson should be very cautious regarding the investment proposal that is developed by his manufacturing team. Although the projections and analysis of the project for the next 10 years proposed by Robert Gates seems reasonable and will generate positive NPV and an IRR greater than the discount rate, NPV is very sensitive with regard to unit volume and unit selling price changes. A decrease in the projected unit volume and selling price might produce

I used WACC as the discount factor, we expect the rate of return to be higher than it, the same at least. The WACC reflects the average risk and overall capital structure of the entire firm [2]. It’s the required return and it presents how much the company pays for the capital it finances. In this case, the cost of equity is 10.33%, the cost of debt is 6.50%. I calculated WACC using those numbers and got a result of 8.49%.

NPV implement require estimates of appropriate discount rate and expected cash flows. And there’s the rub. This is only of use of information at the time of assessment. NPV method was first time developed for bonds value. Little investors in bonds can do it for alternative the final principal paid or yield rate and coupon they receive. Business most over, is not inactive investors: managers have flexibility invest further, sell assets, see and wait for project completely.

Account for time. Time is money. We prefer to receive cash sooner rather than later. Use net present value as a technique to summarize the quantitative attractiveness of the project. Quite simply, NPV can be interpreted as the amount by which the market

WACC is the appropriate discount rate to use for cash flows with risk that is similar to that of the overall firm. Hansson is concerned that the risk of this project is not similar to the risk of current overall firm’s activities. With this project, the company was taking on much more debt and, Hansson believed that, this project could very well change the risk profile of the firm.

For future cash flows, evaluation is done with WACC rate which consists from cost of equity and cost of debt in a weighted average. In this case, using cost of equity is not appropriate since we doesn’t know cost of debt and weights of equity and debt, it doesn’t reflect the actual rate for WACC.

In the case of Worldwide Paper Company we performed calculations to decide whether they should accept a new project or not. We calculated their net income and their cash flows for this project (See Table 1.6 and 1.5). We computed WPC’s weighted average cost of capital as 9.87%. We then used the cash flows to calculate the company’s NPV. We first calculated the NPV by using the 15% discount rate; by using that number we calculated a negative NPV of $2,162,760. We determined that the discount rate of 15% was out dated and insufficient. To calculate a more accurate NPV for the project, we decided to use the rate of 9.87% that we computed. Using this number we got the NPV of $577,069. With the NPV of $577,069 our conclusion is to accept this

WACC is the rate used to discount future cash flows of a firm to their present value. By minimising WACC firms are able to increase the value of the firm. For debt to affect value, there have to be tangible benefits and costs associated with using debt instead of equity. If the benefits exceed the costs, there will be a gain in value to equity investors from the use of debt. If the benefits are less than the costs, increasing debt will lower value (Myers, 2001). Following a $3 billion leveraged recapitalisation, the investment grade of Wrigley decreases from AAA to BB/B and consequently the cost of debt increases to 13% (see appendix 9) which is greater than the post-capitalisation cost of equity of 9.84% (see appendix 8). It is for this reason that the WACC increases from 9.24% to 9.49% (see appendices 5 - 10) which results in a reduction in firm value.

Primary consideration is the capital availability. If the firm has unlimited access to capital and no other investment options, Net Present Value would become recommended quantitative method. On the other hand, if the time horizon and payback period matter, the company should use Internal Rate of Return Calculation.

The Net Present Value (NPV) is essential when determining whether to accept or reject the investment in a new office machine. The discount rate when NPV equals zero is about one hundred eighty nine point two zero six

The project will be analyzed with a net present value calculation. The future cash flows will be calculated and then discounted to present day, then tabulated so that the net present value of the project is determined. This NPV will allow management to make a decision with respect to whether or not the project should be undertaken or not.