“In Response to Executive Order 9066” by Dwight Okita The implied claim for the subject of justice is how a fourteen year old girl is being forced to move into a Japanese relocation camp in the United States during World War II. The girl is not only having to leave her entire life behind, but also having to deal with the hardship of losing her best friend due to the negative sterotype put onto Japanese-Americans at the time. The evidence provided to support Okitas clain is how the girls best friend Denise, who she had always sat by in grade school because of their simular last names, moved across the room from her in their geography class. Denise also asked the girl “Youre trying to start a war, giving secrets to the Enemy, Why cant you keep …show more content…
“The Boy Died in My Alley” by Gwendolyn Brooks The speaker is confrontered with her own short doings and is forced to the realization that she has killed a boy in her ally by not putting a stop to his poor choices with what im assuming is gangs. The speaker says that she knows the boy who was shot in her alley by saing “I have known this Boy before.” and “I have always heard him deal with death.” Next she shows how she has been ignoring him by stating that “I have closed my heart-ears late and early.” Her guilt is shown by the line “And I have killed him ever.” The rhetoric appeal that move the reader closer to the acceptance of the claim that she has helped killed this boy is by logos by showing that by her ignoring the boy in the alleys actions, he was killed and she could have stopped it but chose to turn her cheek. I refute the passage because i belive that the boy made his own choices and while she may have tried to help pull him out of his life style, it had to be his own choice and willingness to change. He could have saved himself just as easily as she could
Roger Daniels’ book Prisoners without Trial is another book that describes the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. This piece discusses about the background that led up to the internment, the internment itself, and what happened afterwards. The internment and relocation of Japanese-Americans during World War II was an injustice prompted by political and racial motivations. The author’s purpose of this volume is to discuss the story in light of the redress and reparation legislation enacted in 1988. Even though Daniels gives first hand accounts of the internment of Japanese Americans in his book, the author is lacking adequate citations and provocative quotations. It’s
1942 In December of 1941, Japan brought the United States into World War II by bombing Pearl Harbor. In response, the American government quickly enacted a number of evacuation orders that sent those of Japanese heritage living in the United States to internment camps. Fear was officially in the states and separating ourselves from the Japanese was our militaries best solution. The precautions brought about by the American government in response to these attacks from Japan can be identified in the short story, “Evacuation Order No. 19”.
to her collar and one to her duffel bag. So, for now on all families had
In the poem “In Response to Executive Order 9066: All Americans of Japanese Descent Must Report to Relocation Centers” , by Dwight Okita, a young Japanese-American girl gives us her point of view on being the race she is at the time. She expirienced recism, at it's finest, and endured it like a champ. In the short story "Merican's," by Sandra Cisneros, a young Mexican-American girl gives us her experience growing up in an American household with a Hispanic grandmother that detested Americans. Both works show that cultural heritage and physical appearances do not determine what it means to be American.
She is truly overcome with grief and overflowing with uncontrollable emotion. She is asking for sympathy and understanding when she says, "Believe that even in my deliberateness I was not deliberate." In addition, she passes the blame when she says, "Though why should I whine, / Whine that the crime was other than mine?" This suggests that she was pressured from another source -- a boyfriend, family member, or society.
A published playwright, poet, and novelist, David Okita, composed the poem “Response to Executive Order 9066”. He describes himself as “Japanese, American, gay, and Buddhist” (Matsunaga). Held in confinement for four years at a Japanese-American concentration camp, Okita’s mother serves as the inspiration for the poem. Okita’s father is a World War II veteran, and this war plays a significant role in the poem. The Japanese-American concentration camps system was a result of unrestrained prejudice during WWII.
War can be loud and visible or quiet and remote. It affects the individual and entire societies, the soldier, and the civilian. Both U.S. prisoners of war in Japan and Japanese-American citizens in the United States during WWII undergo efforts to make them “invisible.” Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken hero, Louie Zamperini, like so many other POWs, is imprisoned, beaten, and denied basic human rights in POW camps throughout Japan. Miné Okubo, a U.S. citizen by birth, is removed from society and interned in a “protective custody” camp for Japanese-American citizens. She is one of the many Japanese-Americans who were interned for the duration of the war. Louie Zamperini, as a POW in Japan, and Miné Okubo, as a Japanese-American Internee both experience efforts to make them “invisible” through dehumanization and isolation in the camps of WWII, and both resist these efforts.
The author of "Response to Executive Order 9066" builds characterization through two groups of people during world war 2. The literary analysis of the story is that Japanese-Americans are not enemies to the united states , and that they are citizens just like everyone else. The excerpt shows how the author is indifferent from the rest of society and that she is the same as any American teenage girl because , she shares the same language , interest , and hobbies as other girls. The authors tone in the "Response to Executive Order 9066" is confused because she as an individual has done nothing wrong to have these type of actions evoked on her.
None of the boys said they have, but the protagonist thought to himself that their friend was dead and lying in the river. He was terrified of this, and he did not have the courage to tell them about the dead body. Young people do not show fear when they think that they can handle a situation. This can be caused by the fact that when they are together they think that they can do a lot with no harm coming their way. This is made worse when they take alcohol and other substances that distort their thinking and reasoning and increase their confidence. The narrator perceives that they were dangerous characters meaning that they were to be feared and they were not afraid of anything. The thought of him having killed a person and the possibility of facing the law scares him. The little epiphany he has in the story is when he feels something soft and he is not sure what it is. This makes him more scared and his fear is heightened when he realizes that it is another dead body. At that time, he realizes the consequences if his actions. This story shows how a person can grow and become mature overnight after realizing the consequences of his actions. The next morning gives the three young men another chance to
5. Relate to students of the same age by interpreting the emotions expressed by seventh graders sent to Japanese Internment Camps
For many children in the camp, their parents come home to the lifeless barracks every night from low paying jobs, and look at their children with ashamed faces. Before the Japanese Americans were forced to live in this relocation center, most of them have never committed a single crime in their lives, and now they are forced to live in a wasteland, everything changed when they stepped foot on the boiling dirt of Manzanar, away from their peaceful neighborhoods, away from equality, away from freedom. In the camp the Japanese Americans felt as if they have spent years within the barbed fences. Now it was the young boys turn, he picked up the dust covered bat, and swept the dirt off the home plate with his
The topic I choose to right about is the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII. The question that I intend to answer today is: The Constitution guarantees American citizens no imprisonment without due process of law, yet has been violated by the federal government in at least two American wars. How did the government justify interning Japanese-American citizens in World War II? In order to understand why this happened we have to first look at what happened. We are going to look at a couple things in this paper: The Executive Order of 9066 and Korematsu v. United States (1944). As well as we are good to look at just why the U.S. decided to not give these people the basic
Mary Matsuda Gruenewald, Looking Like the Enemy: My Story of Imprisonment in Japanese American Internment Camps
In the early 19th century, the world fell into the fires of war that consumed the world- a conflict between different beliefs, nationalism, and militarism that dragged more and more of other countries due to alliances. The world was in turmoil and unrest before the official outbreak of the first Great War, but the formal commencement of the entrance of the United States led to an abrupt change to the general opinion of the Asian American communities within America. The Filipinos, Koreans, Asian Indians, Chinese, and especially the Japanese were pulled into the commotion of disruption and change. As the war progressed, “America’s image of itself as a democracy” became questioned with the passing of Executive Order 9066, the formation of all
The United States of America a nation known for allowing freedom, equality, justice, and most of all a chance for immigrants to attain the American dream. However, that “America” was hardly recognizable during the 1940’s when President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, ordering 120,000 Japanese Americans to be relocated to internment camps. As for the aftermath, little is known beyond the historical documents and stories from those affected. Through John Okada’s novel, No-No Boy, a closer picture of the aftermath of the internment is shown through the events of the protagonist, Ichiro. It provides a more human perspective that is filled with emotions and connections that are unattainable from an ordinary historical document.