preview

Persuasive Essay On Assault Weapons

Decent Essays

One of the many controversies in today’s society and politics is putting a ban on assault weapons. Putting a ban on assault weapons will not reduce crime. There are many other weapons people could use for crime. The banning assault weapons would not stop the number of homicides or suicides either. The United Statesgun laws are nothing like other countries who’ve reduced crime in their nation. Other countries like Germany and the U.K. have developed successful laws and bans. The ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime, so U.S. citizens need a different approach at a ban. The ban’s real purpose is to make the public feel more safe. The Washington Post says “Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.” The withholding of handguns cannot happen unless people yield certain types of weapons to change mentality. On the other hand, weapons like some semiautomatics got left off of the ban. This means that people could get their hands on military-style guns and also mass shootings …show more content…

When the ban expired, the crime rate rose to twenty percent. However, that does not mean that the rate of homicides and suicides will decrease. The ban would make it harder for military-style weapons to be purchased, but handguns that fire dozens of rounds per minute were not written in the ban. Vox states that “the data shows the guns that kill the most in this country aren’t the big, scary-looking ones. They’re handguns.” There have been huge death tolls because of handguns. Vox concludes that “Modern handguns also have the lethal ability to fire multiple bullets in quick succession — and just because they look less ominous doesn't mean we should treat them as any less dangerous.” Since the ban overlooks handguns, the number of homicides and suicides would only

Get Access