Should the drinking age be changed from 21 to 18? J Some would argue that the drinking age should be lowered to 18, while others would argue the drinking age should stay 21 or make the drinking age even higher. I believe that if you’re old enough to vote, get married, and honorably have the right too to serve and die for your country then you have the right to have a beer. A To begin with the law of 21 or over for alcohol consumption is very ineffective “According to the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, underage drinking accounts for 17.5% ($22.5 billion) of consumer spending for alcohol in the United States. In 2006, 72.2% of twelfth graders reported drinking alcohol at some point in their lives.” …show more content…
We shouldn’t deny people 18-20 years old the right to drink. In fact, a good solution for that age group would be too allow the 18-20 year olds to drink but they would legally only be able to drink a lower proof of alcohol. “High non-compliance with drinking under 21 promotes general disrespect and non-compliance with other areas of US law. Drinking under 21 encourages young adults to acquire and use false identification documents to procure alcohol. In this era of national security concerns, including terrorism, illegal immigration, and other threats, it would be better to have fewer fake IDs in circulation and more respect for the law. “Lowering the drinking age from 21 and over to 18 and over would diminish the thrill of breaking the law and drinking under age”. Lowering the drinking age from 18 to 21 would also reduce the number of underage people who are hurt from alcohol-related injuries or accidents due to fear of legal consequences if they sought medical
What is your opinion on the legal drinking age in the United States? Should it be raised or lowered? I think the drinking age should be raised from 21 to 25.It should be raised because the human brain isn't fully developed ,or matured, until age 25, it would reduce youth alcohol problems, and would reduce teen accidents and deaths.
Half the United States population starts drinking at the age of 14.When you are 18 you have privileges like joining the army. (Mitch Adams Lowering the drinking age page 1) You can go to war and die for your country but you still can not enjoy an ice cold beer. (Mitch Adams Lowering the drinking age page 1) How is being 21 different from being 18? How does three more years of not drinking make you mature enough to drink? The longer you drink the more you start to drink responsibly. (Katherine Reilly Why 21? Page 1) The legal drinking age should be lowered to 18 because most teens under 21 drink, when you turn 18 you get tons of privileges, at you 18 are considered an adult and what is so special about the
Lowering the drinking age to 18 in the United States has been a source of controversy in recent years. It has been a controversial topic because many people disagree, while many agree with the topic. For example, the people who disagree and are against lowering the drinking age to 18 believe we should not lower the drinking age because 18 year old individuals are not responsible enough to drink alcohol. While, the people who agree we should lower the drinking age, believe we should let 18 year old individuals drink responsibly because at age 18 you are considered responsible enough to smoke, join the army, be a legal guardian, buy a rifle, and vote. In my opinion, I believe the legal drinking
There have been arguments, more so now than before, about lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 years of age. Realistically, to do so would be unideal. From 1609 when the first colonist arrived in Jamestown in 1919, in the United States of America there were no age restrictions on alcohol consumption or purchase. Prior to Prohibition drinking laws varied by state, and there was no national law in concerns to a drinking age. Most states had no laws establishing a legal drinking age. In 1920, the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified, making the sale and consumption of alcohol in the United States illegal. When Prohibition ended in 1930 the legal drinking age was 18 until 1984, when Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, it forced states to alter their age requirements to legally buy and possess alcohol. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act raised the age limit from 18 to 21 by October of 1986. If states failed to do so, they would lose 10% of their federal highway funding. The goal of the act was achieved by October 1986, which still stand until today. Yet, there are arguments over lowering the drinking age back to 18. To lower the drinking age to 18 would be a defective idea for numerous reasons. The age limit should remain at 21 because all things that can kill you must have restrictions, 18, 19, and 20 year old’s brains are not fully developed, and because it would be in the best for the public interest.
In the United States of America, there is a minimum drinking age of 21. The legal drinking age legally specifies the youngest age in which a person is allowed to consume and purchase alcoholic beverages. From country to country, there are varying ages of legal drinking ages. There is much debate in the United States on whether the legal drinking age should be lowered to eighteen from twenty one, or should remain the same. People in favor of lowering the drinking age propose that since eighteen is characterized as being an adult (legally and socially), one of the rights that should come along with that is drinking alcohol. Also, that if we were to lower the drinking age, less young adults would be
United States is one of the few countries in the world with drinking age over twenty one years. In a country where eighteen years olds are allowed to vote, are allowed smoke, are allowed buy guns, are considered as adults and moreover are drafted in the military where they put their lives in danger for the safety of all of the citizens of this country, however, they are too immature to drink. All the adults should have the right to drink alcohol, and it should be legal for a person who is ready to take care of the country by not just being in military, but by voting in election, making choices that are best for him and the country, to drink when he is eighteen years of age.
Should the drinking age be lowered to 18? Some people might believe that the drinking age should be lowered to 18 while other people think that the minimum drinking age should stay at the age of 21. If the drinking age was lowered to 18 the tax money that taxpayers give would go less to people who are in jail for drinking under the age of 21, because there would be less people in jail for drinking under the age of 21.
The drinking age has been a controversial topic in the United States for years; should the drinking age be lowered to 18 similar to many other countries around the world? Or should the drinking age remain at 21, which has been the MLDA (minimum legal drinking age) since 1986. There for a couple of strong points for both sides on this debate. One of the strongest points for lowering the drinking age is that at 18, you’re considered a legal adult in the United States. Since the United States trusts teenagers with the ability to join the military, sign contracts, go to jail, and many other things but the United States does not allow drinking at the same age. If we also compare the drinking age with other countries around the world, one will see that the United States has a the highest drinking age in the world, and that other countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Ireland, Italy, India, France, etcetera. Some say that the minimum legal drinking age of 21 shouldn’t be changed. People who oppose lowering the drinking age say that allowing 18 year olds to drink can mess up their development and brain growth. Also, many state that the minimum legal drinking age reduces traffic accidents and fatalities. There are great points for both sides in this debate of changing the minimum legal drinking age.
In the United States, when a man or women turn eighteen they are considered an adult. Being eighteen, they are not acknowledged as teenagers anymore. They have more freedom and more opportunities to become independent. Some of the opportunities an eighteen years old are given are the right to vote, open bank accounts, lease their own apartment or join the military. They have equal opportunities like adults over the age of twenty-one. However, anyone between the age of eighteen through twenty are not allowed to purchase alcoholic beverages or attend bars because they are considered underage. Anyone between the age of eighteen and twenty should not be denied the right purchase alcoholic beverage. They are mature and well aware of the consequences alcohol leads to. Allowing the legal drinking age to lower to eighteen, it will decrease unsafe drinking activities, decrease misdemeanors, and also decrease the percentage of drunk driving accidents. People are considered adults by the time they are eighteen they should have the equal right as any other adults, despite of their age.
Drinking alcohol has been a very controversial activity in America for as long as many can remember. Back in 1919 to 1933 there was a period of prohibition where the manufacturing and selling of alcohol was completely banned, but they realized that banning alcohol wasn’t the answer to the problems they faced. In fact, today many believe that anyone under the age of 21 is prohibited from drinking alcohol, but that’s not the case. Underage drinking is allowed in 29 states if done on private property with parental consent, 25 states allow drinking for religious reasons, and 11 states allow it for educational purposes (“Drinking Age”). Another misconception is that the minimum drinking age was always 21 in the U.S. Surprisingly, between 1970 and 1976, 30 states lowered their minimum legal drinking age from 21 to 18, 19, or 20. This raises the question, what should the legal drinking age actually be? Is 21 unnecessarily old? This house believes the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18 because 18 year olds are legal adults, higher drinking ages make alcohol and drugs attractive to minors, and people need to learn safe drinking habits from a young age.
Many people think the drinking age should stay the same or even be lowered. They say that age should not depend on your responsibility to be able to drink. Some even say the drinking age is already too high and that the deaths do not matter how old you are. People that are around the age of eighteen are already independent and that they are already considered adults, so they shoud be able to drink. Even though some people believe that the drinking age should stay the same or it should be lowered, the drinking age should actually be raised to the age of twenty-five.
The drinking age in America should be lowered to a more accurate age eighteen, as this is an age people are considered to be adults in most aspects of life. By the time one turns eighteen, they are trusted to drive, serve on a jury, vote, fight in the military, and be tried as adults in a court of law. However, though eighteen year olds are considered mature enough to do these things, they are not, under current laws, capable of drinking a beer with friends or family. This is a completely hypocritical law, as eighteen year olds are only considered adults in certain circumstances, yet they are seen as not being able to handle the responsibilities of alcohol. However,
The legal drinking age has been 21 for more than 30 years. However, it is still frequently debated whether 21 should remain the legal age to consume alcohol, or whether it should be changed to 18. The legal drinking age should be lowered to 18 for many reasons. One of these reasons is that even though it is widely argued that alcohol consumption damages development of the frontal lobe at age 18, this part of the brain can be still be damaged at age 21 just as easily. Another reason is that legalization of alcohol at age 18 would cause drinking to have less of a thrilling appeal to teens. Lastly, it is absurd that 18 year old adults can make life changing decisions, but cannot drink alcohol. I am not advocating a lowered drinking age for own personal enjoyment. It just seems logical.
The drinking age limit have many consequences for young adults. If at the age of 18 going to war and voting is allowed, drinking a beer should be allowed as well. The prohibition of alcohol drinking before 21 has led to rebellion, binge drinking and breaking the law with fake ID’s, building more problems, rather than solving the problem of “immature” drinking. The history of the United States in the 1920s shows that when alcohol was banned led to many street wars, crimes and many other illegal activities, if this did not work in the past, it should not
People are considered adults at the age of eighteen and are finally able to vote, enlist in the military, marry without parental approval, get tattoos or piercings without consent, work full time, serve in jury duty, sue someone, and are responsible for signing a contract, yet they are still not able to drink. If someone is considered an adult at eighteen, then he or she should be able to participate in everything that suits him or her. Many states are considering this rationale such as, “In Alaska, a bill was recently introduced that would allow active members of the military to drink at the age of 18, with the rationale that if they're old enough to fight and die for their country, they're old enough to have a beer” (Ogilvie 1). If someone is capable of laying down their life for the sake of everyone’s country or determine the policies or who has power in the United States, then they should be able to consume alcohol. It is necessary for the legal drinking age to be lowered in order for all legal ages to be