INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW In health care, patients’ lives are in the hands of the health care practitioners, health care organizations, insurance companies, and to some degree, even health care technology. The growth and future implications of evidence-based medicine (EBM) through improvement of technology in health care are important today, because health care practitioners and organizations want to ultimately decrease cost, improve quality of care, and increase access to health care (Glandon, Smaltz, & Slovensky, 2014, p. 28). One way to achieve these goals is through the implementation and improvement of EBM and interoperability which will enhance the efficiency of work production resulting in these positive outcomes. According to Glandon, Smaltz, and Slovensky (2014), EBM is an “information management and learning strategy that seeks to integrate clinical expertise with the best evidence available to make effective clinical decisions that will ultimately improve patient care,” (p. 6). “Interoperability is the ability of different information and communications technology systems and software applications to communicate, to exchange data accurately, effectively, and consistently, and to use information that has been exchanged,” (Iroju, Soriyan, Gambo, & Olaleke, 2013, para. 1). Without interoperability and EBM, fundamental data and information such as patient records cannot be easily shared across and within enterprises having a direct impact on the quality of care. It
Two organizations migrating to a common health information system would need a system that meets current regulatory requirements, meets the needs of the combined organization and their practice environment. The implementation of a common health information system would require an interdisciplinary group of forward thinking innovators, and an interoperable electronic medical record system that includes standard nursing terminology.
Healthcare systems are highly complex, fragmented, and use multiple information technology systems and vendors who incorporate different standards resulting in inefficiency, waste, and medical errors (Healthinformatics, 2016). A patient 's medical information often gets trapped in silos, which prevents information from being shared with members of the healthcare community (Healthinformatics, 2016). With increasing healthcare costs, a system needed to be created that would lead to the development and nationwide implementation of an interoperable health information technology system to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare. Introducing the National Health Information Network (NHIN), this organization can be defined as a set of
In 2013, the HIMSS Board of Directors defined interoperability in health care as having the ability to have different information technology systems and software applications communicate, exchange date, and then use the information that has been exchanged (HIMSS, 2015). Data exchange permits data accessibility between organizational boundaries, while interoperability means health systems have the ability to work together in order to advance the health status of the individuals and communities the system serves. For two systems to be interoperable, they must be able to exchange data that can be understood by a user (HIMSS, 2015). This is extremely important to the goals of HITECH and meaningful use because it aligns with the government standard
In today’s fragmented healthcare system, clinical decisions are made based on the available information. Unfortunately, the available information is not always complete. Patients have been using an increasing number of providers and health systems, many of which have no way to effectively communicate clinical information. This forces healthcare providers to make decisions based on incomplete information at the cost of outcomes to the patients and dollars to the health system. It is estimated that the use of health information exchange (HIE) could save $78 billion in healthcare costs per year (Shortliffe, 2014, p425). A concerted effort to solve this problem began in 2009, when The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
Interoperability is often a word frequently used as a goal to strive for when improving healthcare in the United States. Encouraging the utilization of health information exchange has been cited as a potential way to improve efficiency, increase safety, and enhance quality of care. There are numerous examples of how linking information between multiple data sources leads to a non-trivial task. When two operations are collecting the same data, but are recording information in different formats, it can be nearly impossible to bridge the information between those systems. Standards are important because they can facilitate mutual understanding during in regards to communication and health measures in the context of population health.
Each hospital has a specific policy and procedure protocol for every patient related procedure etc. These protocols vary form hospital to hospital yet their main purpose is to provide specific details on how they want the procedures performed. It is important to provide a rationale along with current research as to why certain procedures need specific details. I will be including what current evidence based practice suggest and what Santa Clara Valley Medical Hospital’s policy suggest is the proper protocol for seizure precautions.
In my own words, health care interoperability is nothing short of essential. Interoperability’s basis falls on the exchange of data, but moving more specifically it’s the ability to exchange data regardless of the many different systems and/or codes of multiple Health Care establishments to finally end in the proper use of this data to improve quality of health care. Interoperability’s definition is very specific and in today’s world I view it as a goal that the Health Care system wishes to achieve. There are many different Health Care establishments that are spread all across the world. It is important for everything to be able to not only be transferred but to be understood. Interoperability is very important because health situations can
It is true that "information and information exchange are crucial to the delivery of care on all levels of the health care delivery system the patient, the care team, the health care organization, and the encompassing political-economic environment" (Reid et al., 2013, p 63). Information systems play a huge role in health care in the contemporary context, although they had a much more limited role in the past, and even twenty years ago HCIS systems were nowhere near as complicated or as multi-faceted as they are today. As the need for dynamic and holistic care has increased in recent years, so has the adaptation of HCIS systems which streamline both administrative and clinical processes, making health care more efficient on a much larger scale.
Research as most us are aware, is a crucial and required process that should be considered, practiced and performed when trying to understand why certain problems occur, when new information is taken into perspective, and even when old information is set into question. Research is known to be effective in working environments such as: retail, hospitality, finance, marketing etc. That said, research in the health information management (HIM) field is no different and it is especially needed and helpful due to the on-going transition of paper health records to electronic formats. Thanks to the help of HIM professionals participating in research, things such as: electronic health information (EHR) integration, data quality, data collection, data structure, interoperability, reduction of medication errors, and patient care
As the implementation of electronic health records (EHR) progress nationwide, the concepts of interoperability and health information exchange (HIE) must be discussed. The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (2005, p. 2) define interoperability as “the ability of health information systems to work together within and across organizational boundaries in order to advance the effective delivery of healthcare for individuals and communities.” Interoperability is the enabling of two systems, including those that do not share
In the past few decades, numerous critiques of contemporary Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) have emerged, pointing to the limitations of scientific method in medicine. Critics turn to the Eastern philosophy and Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) in search of a new medical paradigm: holistic or total medicine. Japan, boasting a tradition of over a thousand years of practice of Chinese medicine (known as Kampo or the Chinese method), is no exception. In Japan, the postulate of ‘new medicine’ was formulated by Kampo physicians as early as the late Meiji period, and found its culmination in the publication of Baba Kazumitsu’s Riron to Jissai: Kampo Chiryo Kowa (1937). Contemporary advocates of ‘new medicine’ call primarily for adoption
The third step that health care institutions will need to implent to be successful is the use of technology and system integration. Technology is a vital change in health care. Technology changes everyday and so does the way that we use it. Currently, most health care institutions operate on a interdependent system but, due to the need for patient information to be accessed from any health care organization systems are slowly starting to become more interoperable with the goal that all health care organizations will be connected by one large system. With the increased technology and the need for these systems health care officals have to also be concerned about patient privacy. As healthcarebusiness tech.com(2016) states " As technology in
It is imperative to have quality and accurate data that must be validated in order for health care providers to provide quality care for their patients. Accurate data can be impeded or compromised by As a result, not excessive data, measurement instruments are erroneous, “imprecision in terminology, illegibility and inaccessibility of records, and other opportunities for misinterpretation of data.” “..Use of faulty data can have serious adverse effects on patient-care decisions” (Musen, Middleton, & Greenes, 2014). Physicians must have current knowledge otherwise they can inadvertently harm a patient. Systems must not have redundant data and it must also be consistent so that all physicians see the same data in EHRs and thus provide the appropriate care to patients.
You mention that sematic interoperability has a long time to being solve. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed and implement semantically interoperable health information systems and EHRs. Over the years volume of patient data has been available in electronic format. WHO’s develop an outline on the areas of implementation for the semantically interoperable
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a method that treats clinical issues by utilizing best scientific research, clinical expertise, and patient values. Many patients die from medical errors which can be prevented. As a result, EBM can be implemented to prevent these errors and as a result, improve the quality of healthcare provided to patients. Furthermore, health care costs are rising and the industry is trying to find ways to decrease those costs. They believe by employing the EBM it can help to remove redundant tests that are performed. “With the cost of health care rising along with its benefits, creating an evidence-based system will be critical to achieving the promise of personalized medicine in which treatments are more targeted to those