ACTIVITY: 1
Task 1: An evaluation of leadership theories.
Task 2: An evaluation of the impact of managerial styles on organizational effectiveness.
Task 3: An analysis of how motivational theory can inform employee motivation.
Task 4: An analysis of theories relating to work relationships and interaction.
Please consider these as a report:
Leadership theories:
For decades, leadership theories have been the source of numerous studies. In reality as well as in practice, many have tried to define what allows authentic leaders to stand apart from the mass! Hence, there as many theories on leadership as there are philosophers, researchers and professors that have studied and ultimately published their leadership theory.
There are so many leadership theories has been explained from ages, here some theories, are commonly categorised by which aspect is believed to define the leader the most widespread one’s are:
Traits theories
The Great Man theories
Situational theories
Behavioral theories Trait theory (1930-1940)
In psychology, trait theory also called dispositional theory, is an approach to the study of human personality. Personality traits measurement weren’t reliable across studies. Many studies have analyzed the traits among existing leaders in the hope of uncovering those responsible for ones leadership abilities! In vain, the only characteristics that were identified among these individuals were those that were slightly taller and slightly more intelligent.
Trait
There are volumes written on leadership theory in nearly every discipline. Bolman and Deal sifted through the complex theories and literature and combined with their own analyses, theories and experience devised a four-frame model as a way of understanding organizations and leadership within organizations. Frames are described as being the lens through which anyone sees the world and places that world in order (University of Melbourne). Frames help individuals to filter out the things in the world they do not want to see, thus, frames are inherently inaccurate and skewed in terms of reality (University of Melbourne). But, people need
Leadership theories denotes to the technique that a manager accepts in order to implementation authority in the work place and be able to direct workforce towards convention the structural mandate as outlined in their job descriptions. It is the approach that a director recourses in order to discharge all the sum total of accountabilities that involves organization and managing. The theories of leadership might be categorized into, Trait theory, and Behavioral theory and Transactional & Transformational theories and Situational Theory of leadership.
The following paper outlines the comparison and contrast of four leadership models and theories. The purpose of this paper is to acquaint readers with the basic concepts underlying each model and theory. A review of the scholarly studies on leadership shows that there is a wide variety of different theoretical approaches to explain the complexities of the leadership process (e.g., Bass, 1990; Bryman, 1992; Gardner, 1990; Hickman 1998; Rost, 1991). Some researchers conceptualize as a trait, or as behavior, while others view leadership from a political perspective, or from a humanistic viewpoint.
Leadership theories in and of themselves carry negative and positives characteristics. Within the various theories lie strengths and weaknesses that when applied to complex problems can highlight each one respectively. As I examine a few theories, I will look at the strengths and weaknesses of each and determine when and with which situation would these theories best be utilized. Collective leadership or distributive leadership, and leader-member exchange are both theories that incorporate specific team or group mentalities.
The theories or concepts of leadership such as the Great Man theory, collective leadership, and scholar-practitioner are ideas that transformed the way leaders lead. The comparisons of the leadership styles illustrated that direction does not change. Within the comparisons, leadership links from one theory or concept to another. Each theory or idea is a building block for what a leader needs to be successful. The Great Man theory depicts a person of great need that possesses the characteristics of a leader from birth. A leader has the features or traits of a great leader without
This report reviews and examines the theories behind leadership; identifying and analysing the concept of leadership and leaders from an analytical perspective. Some of the key points will focus on areas I have particular disputes with. Areas such as:
All the theories speak about the same aspect of leader, that they can access the key follower and situational factors.
Leadership is a broadly used concept which needs to be defined narrowly. One way is to define the context in which it is used and the process within which it fits. Moreover, theories on leadership have explored and studied it from many angels. Trait Theory of leadership asks what type of person makes a good leader. Moreover, early trait theories said that leadership is an innate, instinctive quality that you do or don 't have. Thankfully, we 've moved on from this idea, and we 're learning more about what we can do to develop leadership qualities within ourselves and others. In contrast behavioral theories studies what good leaders do and how they behave. For instance, do leaders dictate what needs to be done and expect cooperation? Or do they involve their teams in decision-making to
There are eight major leadership theories that were developed to identify the characteristics that made a leader. The Great Man theory declares that leadership is a natural and ingrained trait in an individual. This theory is based on the premise that great leaders are born
Over the years, in an attempt to define leadership and reach a consensus on what it is, various leadership theories have ensued. Some leadership theories include; great man, transactional, situational, style, trait, skill, contingency, transformational,
I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own. Where the work of others has been used to support my work then credit has been acknowledged.
There are many different leadership theories and styles as proven by simply doing an internet search. The vast results include the following examples: directive leadership, transactional leadership, transformational leadership and participative (empowering) leadership. Often leaders utilize different leadership styles or a
A key determinant in an organizational success is directly related with the management styles of leadership. According to Parris & Peachey (2013), the key to understanding an organizations success is to study its leaders. A leader’s ability to inspire, motive, and create a strong sense of engagement and commitment to the organization will determine the success or failure in the attainment of goals. Transformational, charismatic, and servant leadership are three styles that organizational leaders might possess. While there is no predetermined best style of leadership, one can describe leadership and management as situational. The overriding goal of any organization is building a high-performing organization which is paramount for short and long term success (DeGraw & Sizoo, 2013). Both the leader and the organization should select the most appropriate style to enhance organizations probability for effectiveness and attainment of desire goals. Studies have shown when organizations have the right leadership in place, an organization can have shared vision that is articulated in a manner where subordinates desire work enthusiastically towards the accomplishment of the goals (Parris & Peachey, 2013).
Leadership theories are attempts to answer some of the question people have about leadership. These theories range from simple “armchair philosophies” about the personal characteristics and effect relationship between leaders and followers and situations.
There were many shortfalls with the trait leadership theory. However, from a psychology of personalities approach, Gordon Allport's studies are among the first ones and have brought, for the study of leadership, the behavioural