THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE
Leadership is a matter of intelligence, trustworthiness, humaneness, courage, and discipline . . . Reliance on intelligence alone results in rebelliousness. Exercise of humaneness alone results in weakness. Fixation on trust results in folly. Dependence on the strength of courage results in violence. Excessive discipline and sternness in command result in cruelty. When one has all five virtues together, each appropriate to its function, and then one can be a leader. — Sun Tzu
1 Leadership is and has been described as the “process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task”[1]. A definition more
…show more content…
Furthermore, leaders who plan to implement knowledge management initiatives need to assess the stage of their organizational growth as different types of cultural transformation mechanisms should deployed in accordance to the different stages of organizational growth.
7. Viitala agreed with Schein’s contention on the significant roles played by leadership on the knowledge-supportive organizational culture. She asserted that leaders are “creators of organizational climate…who make interventions to the community of work are safe and supportive in order to facilitate learning”. She further proposed the term knowledge leadership as the most suitable leadership in knowledge management implementation. Knowledge leadership is a participative leadership that create climate to promote learning, support learning process at individual and group level and inspires employees toward continual development. The most important principle is that the knowledge leaders must “lead by example” [7]. Riebera and Sitar (2003) did not propose any new breed of leadership for the knowledge management but highlighted the imperative roles of leadership in implementation of knowledge-supportive culture.
8. A research worth highlighting is done by Politis (2001) on the relationship of different types of leaderships to knowledge management. Finding of his research showed that leadership styles that involve human
KM Strategy – the strategy of knowledge management must be associated with vision and values
Since the mid-1990s, knowledge management has become increasingly significant for business managers and companies. ‘It is broadly accepted that systematic knowledge management is tightly linked with gaining and sustaining competitive advantage.’ (Bogner & Bansal, 2007, p658-6 as cited in Hislop, 2009, p1) The definition of knowledge management is various because of the wide range of this concept and its complexity (Al-Hawamdeh, 2003). For example, the broad definition provided by McAdam and McCreedy (2000, p155 as cited in Hislop 2009, p53) note that: ‘KM relates to the management of anything classified as knowledge’ Furthermore, Hislop (2009, p59)
During commercial presentations, it happens quite often to see the commercial director explaining to a client what the company does, what kind of services provided, who are the potential customers and the best results recorded. Rarely, it is possible to assist to a presentation on who the company is. In fact, we tend to focus on the characteristics of a product or service; we leave out what drives us to produce, what choices we made, what we (leaders, managers and entrepreneurs) can inspire to the employees. Moreover, the vision that we have of our work and of our customers has left
The team manager often talks with the team about her beliefs in constant personal improvement and high productivity so that her team can stand out and have an excellent resume’ when they are ready and willing to move into a different role at Humana. She encourages the team to learn about the many different areas of the company and focus on where they would like to go inside the company.
Chapter 12 highlights the different reasons for managing knowledge that include the need to respond accurately to globalization as well as rapid change, the need to manage communication and information overload, organizational downsizing, leveraging knowledge in order to gain competitive advantage as well as controlling knowledge embedded within different products in an organization. The author also elaborates how knowledge management can be viewed as a dynamic process, which involves the transfer, capturing, generation, and codification of knowledge. The chapter also asserts that business intelligence utilizes technologies and data to understand business performance.
Knowledge Management has been a core requirement of many organizational practices and mostly in gaining competitive advantage over other firms. Knowledge itself is precious but if not used properly, then
On the other hand it is said that knowledge management system is more than just a piece of application. It also involves change in organizational culture in the way their employees can have relevant environment to develop the knowledge.it is organization culture, which holds the key to success. It also requires full cooperation of management. These are few ethical challenges every organization must face but every organization have their own sets of objectives to bring knowledge management system into their organization.
In the contemporary corporate cultural based world, a knowledge management system (KMS) is considered an important element to assist the sharing and integration of knowledge within the organization. An effective knowledge management strategy is capable of resolving knowledge management issue arises at any level in the organization (top management-to-bottom management level). A successful KMS also helps in increasing the overall business performance through ensuring staff performance, project management, organizational change management, quality of deliverables and the satisfaction of the staffs and customers. On the other side a lack of implementation of proper knowledge management system may hinder the performance of the staffs and the overall productiveness for the organization.
The role of leadership in the success of any organization is very much important. Although in Pakistan very little importance is given to this aspect of organizations inspite of this its importance cannot be denied. In other words, Leadership is the backbone of any knowledge centric organization. This research article shed light on the importance of effective leadership skills and practices which can lead any organization to its golden era. The main focus of the study is the changing nature of leadership with the evolution in the meaning of knowledge based organizations. The study is
Knowledge management comprises strategies and processes designed to identify, capture, value, leverage and share an organization’s intellectual assets to enhance its performance and competitiveness. It is a discipline that enable individuals, teams, organizations and communities to capture, store, share and apply their knowledge more collectively and systematically, to achieve their objectives. It is a tool required to manage knowledge and transfer of knowledge within an organization. Knowledge management is not only about managing the latest technology, tool or strategy but also managing the knowledge within the company and treating it as the most valuable asset for the success of the company.
Knowledge management is a term and a concept which began in the early 1990s. Despite the popular notion that knowledge management only began as a practice with the rise of technology, it has been around as a concept for around 15,000 years. At that time in history, merchants, artisans, doctors, and others first began writing down their knowledge for future generations. In Mesopotamia, roughly 5,000 years ago, people began to have difficulty keeping track of all the clay tablets on which information was written and created the first organized knowledge management solutions, the library (Bergeron 2003). Over the years, even as human advanced technologically, the idea of knowledge management remained. Since the idea of knowledge management arose as a management idea in the 1990s, it has undergone several changes in definition as ideas have changed. First, in 1994, it was defined as “the process of capturing, distributing, and effectively using knowledge.” While this was a very straight forward definition, it had the disadvantage of not including any mention of the human element. Thus, in 1998, the definition was changed to be “a discipline that promotes an integrated approach to identifying, capturing, evaluating, retrieving, and sharing all of an enterprise’s information assets, which may include databases, documents, policies, procedures, and previously un-captured expertise and experience in individual workers.” Finally, as technology has created more of an element of
Knowledge management has gained substantial importance in the past few years due to the realisation of numerous advantages associated with efficient knowledge management. An improved decision-making process, considerable increased in productivity and quality, sharing of best practices, less circumstance for reinvention process, and increased development of the skills and talent of the workforce are some of the benefits associated with the knowledge management within the organisations. (Jennex, 2008, p.275). Efficient combination of previously unrelated elements and exchange of tacit knowledge helps in the creation of knowledge that correspondingly leads to appropriate transfer of the gained knowledge transfer (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998). The implementation of knowledge management strategies depends a great deal
Knowledge management has been in the picture over the last two decades. Over those years it slowly evolved to the status of a discipline and growth. Knowledge management roots from multidisciplinary contributions that come together to support it. To be empowered with knowledge is very important during this time frame where economy can be directly related to knowledge. Knowledge can be broadly classified into two forms, tacit and explicit. “Knowledge typically resides in structured documents, informal discussions that may or may not persist online, and in tacit form.” (Grudin, 2006). Organizations use knowledge as a marketable good or an intellectual asset and are unique when compared with other marketable commodity.
Based on my opinion, an organization should invest in knowledge management initiatives. In my opinion, I feel that an organizational really should take a step in investing knowledge management because it is integral to every organization’s ability to continue boosting the practices involved in the management of complex initiatives and the building of collective intelligence. Knowledge management can stand-in innovation of the free flow of ideas, facilitates
Knowledge management, which is defined according to Rastogi (2000) as a systematic process with “activities of acquiring, creating, storing, sharing, diffusing, developing, and deploying knowledge by individuals and groups in pursuit of major organizational goals”(p. 40). Furthermore, knowledge management provides a suitable platform for an organization to expand its information infrastructures (Thang Le & Fillion, 2007). With technological advances and the rising tech savvy consumers more and more organizations are implementing knowledge management systems from business firms to health care. However, in order to have an effective knowledge management system is dependent on various tangible as well as intangible factors such as on the type of manager, an administrator, the working staff, and technologies involved (Stromquist & Samoff, 2000).