The Major Difference Between Religion And Science

When comparing science and religion there has been a great rift. As long as humanity has believed in a creator there as always been thinkers trying to quantify and evaluate the truth behind religion, trying to disprove or prove a supernatural force.

There are quite a few differences between Christian Science and Scientology. For instance, Christian Science started in 1879. It was founded by a poor woman named Mary Baker Eddy who became rich from her new founded religion. Scientology was founded in 1953. Unlike Christian Science, Scientology is an independent religion. It was founded by a man named L. Ron Hubbard. Christian Science is based off Christianity. It is a new interpretation of the Bible. Scientology is a religious responds to therapeutic help. Christian Science centers on the idea of God. Scientology focuses on a person in need of help. Christian Science sees God as the only creator. Scientology believes that the creator is a person completely free. God has no importance in Scientology.

Science and religion were cohabitating until the nineteenth century when evolution was widely accepted. Now they seem to be mortal enemies but is that the way it should be? Science in fact uses faith just as religion does. We know that truth is absolute and knowable, our universe is orderly and researchable, and we can trust our

California is the most populated state in the United States. It has nine regions of which Northern California is the main focus. It has very many people with very different ethnic, racial, religious and national backgrounds. Notably, the population of California stands out as one of the most varied and composite anywhere on the globe. The population has rapidly increased over the last century. By 1950, the population of California was only about 10 million people. As of 2000, the population had increased threefold to an approximation of almost 35 million people (Reyes & Currie, 2001).

Is there a conflict between religion and science, or are both items compatible? This question is addressed in the debate that is written about in the book Science and Religion, Are they Compatible, by Daniel C. Dennett and Alvin Plantinga. Alvin Plantinga thoroughly debates the topic by covering the compatibility of Christianity and science. He continues his argument by stating the issue of naturalist and science harbor the conflict not the theism. Plantinga goes into detail how some scientific theories without the help of theism has conflict and should be considered falsifiable because of the contradictions they possess. While Alvin Plantinga does make a prominent effort to illustrate how religion and science are compatible, there are also

have formulated many theories as to the origins of man and to the creation of the

I remember it well as if it were yesterday, but it over 40 years ago when I walked into Dr. E’s. Office asking for his opinion about something; that I needed help having to do with correctly responding to the interrelationship between Science and Christianity. I had my own discernment and interpretation on this topic, but I wanted a practical, realistic way to approach this discussion when asked, even if it was a couple days later, or during a confirmation class. Though I did not have Dr. E as a professor, or took one of his courses in geology, I knew that he could help me in a constructive way. Dr. E. was my mentor and sponsor and he was always receptive to anything that I had to ask whether it was a simple or complex question of the day. On that day, I wanted to know his understanding of God’s creation of science, its separation from, but more so to its correlation to the theology of Christianity. At times, I was puzzled by some people’s insistence that the two shall never meet. Where I was coming from the standpoint and still hold true, that Jesus, Son of God is the Great Physician as recounted in the healings parables and based and John 5:1-9. I also believed and have no problem seeing that science and medical advances were beneficial and true blessings from God. Another vital point of understanding that I base this reflection upon is the profound belief that that God works his power and purpose through the means of science as wisdom and hard work is expressed

John William Draper, in the History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science, states, “The history of Science is not a mere record of isolated discoveries; it is a narrative of the conflict of two contending powers, the expansive force of the human intellect on one side, and the compression arising from traditionary faith and human interests on the other.” John William Draper brings up a strong truth behind the progression of science. Human faith inevitably conflicts with the progression of science. One may think that religion is the moral part of human belief and science is the advancement of intellect. It is inevitable that morals and the advancement of intellect would. Emotions and morals sometimes may overpower what the advancement of science would lead to. This concept is present in the ethical controversy involved with the Catholic Church and stem cell research. The moral and heart of many members of the Catholic Church easily disables the acceptance and support of stem cell research. This is unfortunate because stem cell usage and research has tremendous potential in helping those that suffer from disease. Stem cell research will advance medical fields and assist in finding cures for deadly ailments. Many followers of the Catholic Church view the science of stem cell research as killing innocent lives, however a sense of the faithful needs to come into action in order to look passed tradition and history to

Science and religion can coexist because people must understand that science and religion are two ways of understanding and they answer different questions. Today, scientific and religious leaders agree that science and religion represent different realities in life. Furthermore, based on the SF theory scientist also believe that religion is significant in upholding stability and solidarity in society such as it does in the scientific community by upholding moral guidance. Finally, based on the SC theory in history, we have observed that some of the most religious systems have also encouraged scientific progress. Therefore, religious leaders understand that religious restriction prohibits development and scientific growth to the point that the most powerful leaders have encouraged scientific

Christianity is similar to Christian Science in many ways, but it’s also very different. By describing Christianity, by describing Christian Science and eventually comparing them, you will see the similarities and differences. These are two popular religions and many people follow them around the world. Christianity is one of the Abrahamic faiths, Christians believe in one God and that Jesus is his son who came down to earth to save them.

In 1859, Charles Darwin published his biological book: The origin of Species (Wyhe). This book sparked controversy over science and religion. The book claimed creation must have taken a much longer time to develop than the bible claimed it did. Many religious institutions were hostile to the publication, but many scientist welcomed the idea of evolution through natural selection. The book divided England between the religious and the scientific. Individuals often found themselves contemplating between God and science.

Science differs immensely from religion in a variety of ways. Science is defined as “systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.” (Dictionary.com) Science takes everything in the natural world and gives us the tools to better understand the universe.

The first category that will be explained is conflict. This is optimally categorized with the statement that, “Science and religion investigate common questions, but their theories contradict one another and so compete with one another for our acceptance.” (Pojman 562). With the view of conflict, it is believed that science and religion overlap in regard to the quest for truth, but their methods and findings are contradictory. This theory is most commonly held by religious fundamentalists, those that believe in strictly literal translation of scripture; and the more recent movement of new atheism that is

Despite what people may think, evolution versus religion has been around for a long time. It is a well known debate topic in hundreds of countries. While being around in numerous centuries, and having an important role in many people’s lives, the controversy rages on. With the argument of evolution versus religion, some people may believe religion is the right answer, however evolution gives a whole new answer to the question due to the unrealistic nature of an omnipotent figure, supporting factors of the Earth’s age, and ridiculous aspects of the creationist theory.

What is the relationship between religion and science? In his book, Consilience, Edward O. Wilson aims to find a unified theory of knowledge. Consilence also seeks to show how science is superior to and can replace religion. In this paper, I intend to show how Wilson understands this relationship and science as well as how. as well as show John Stuart Mill would agree or disagree with Wilson.