preview

Tune In, Turn On, Cop Out?

Better Essays

Today the media is more influential than ever. Movies, books, podcasts, tv shows, and other various media outlets have influenced the nation tremendously. Violence has also been a hot topic these past few years. Gun shootings, homicides, and overall crimes are consistently being committed and shared on the news. The topic of violence and the discussion of media influencing that violence is extremely intriguing. In 2008, John Murray, a psychologist, wrote in his published book, “Fifty years of research on the effect of TV violence on children leads to the inescapable conclusion that viewing media violence is related to increases in aggressive attitudes, values, and behaviors” (Murray, 2008, p. 1212). This research shows that there is a correlation …show more content…

It focused on determining the media's liability for violent audience behavior. Several high-profile cases, in which media was liable for the violence, were included in this. One of these specifically was Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors (Calvert, 2002, p.247-248). This paper analyzes two cases, Zamora v. NBC and Rice v. Paladin Press, involving media influence on violence to further explain how and when the media ends up liable for such actions. The research question therefore is “How are, Zamora v. CBS and Rice v. Paladin Press, different regarding media influence?”. The two cases are the Zamora v. CBS case and Rice v. Paladin Press case. Delving deep into the details of each case, will reveal when the media was and was not liable for the cases when the criminal’s ideas came from the media. In the Zamora v. CBS case, the parents said the son was “subliminally intoxicated” by the television shows he viewed on CBS. The media was found not liable for the actions of the son (Zamora v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 480 F. Supp. 199 S.D. Fla. 1979). In the Rice v. Paladin Press case, the media, specifically, Paladin Enterprises, Inc., who was the publisher of Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors, was held liable for the actions of the “Hit Man”. Both cases were …show more content…

For example, in Zamora v. CBS the excuse of a teenager, who brutally murdered his 82-year old neighbor, claimed to be “involuntarily subliminally intoxicated” by watching violent content on television, specifically Columbia Broadcasting Studios (BeVier, 2004, p.48). For instance, in these cases, such as, Zamora v. CBS, the broadcast station did not end up liable for the child's personal injuries. This was because the broadcast speech was protected under the First Amendment. Due to the fact that what was said in the broadcast did not give rise to a clear and present danger of personal injury to the child. Also, to decide whether or not the broadcast speech qualifies for protection under the First Amendment, the court has to determine and evaluate the difference between advocacy and the incitement fall (Gulbis, 1983; Kastanek, 2004,

Get Access