Do firms need to consider the so-called corporate social responsibilities in making investment decisions? See attached related reading

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Chapter10: Auditing Cash And Marketable Securities
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 69RSCQ
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

Do firms need to consider the so-called corporate social responsibilities in
making investment decisions?

See attached related reading

MINI CASE
Nike and Sweatshop Labor
Nike, a company headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, is a major force in the sports
footwear and fashion industry, with annual sales exceeding $12 billion, more than
half of which now come from outside the United States. The company was co-founded
in 1964 by Phil Knight, a CPA at Price Waterhouse, and Bill Bowerman, college track
coach, each investing $500 to start. The company, initially called Blue Ribbon Sports,
changed its name to Nike in 1971 and adopted the "Swoosh" logo-recognizable
around the world-originally designed by a college student for $35. Nike became
highly successful in designing and marketing mass-appealing products such as the Air
Jordan, the best-selling athletic shoe of all time.
Nike has no production facilities in the United States. Rather, the company manu-
factures athletic shoes and garments in such Asian countries as China, Indonesia,
and Vietnam using subcontractors, and sells the products in the U.S. and interna-
tional markets. In each of those Asian countries where Nike has production facili-
ties, the rates of unemployment and under-employment are quite high. The wage
rate is very low in those countries by U.S. standards-the hourly wage rate in the
manufacturing sector is less than $1 in each of those countries, compared with about
$20 in the United States. In addition, workers in those countries often operate in
poor and unhealthy environments and their rights are not particularly well protected.
Understandably, host countries are eager to attract foreign investments like Nike's
to develop their economies and raise the living standards of their citizens. Recently,
however, Nike came under worldwide criticism for its practice of hiring workers for
such a low rate of pay-"next to nothing" in the words of critics-and condoning poor
working conditions in host countries.
Initially, Nike denied the sweatshop charges and lashed out at critics. But later, the
company began monitoring the labor practices at its overseas factories and grading
the factories in order to improve labor standards. Nike also agreed to random factory
inspections by disinterested parties.
Transcribed Image Text:MINI CASE Nike and Sweatshop Labor Nike, a company headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, is a major force in the sports footwear and fashion industry, with annual sales exceeding $12 billion, more than half of which now come from outside the United States. The company was co-founded in 1964 by Phil Knight, a CPA at Price Waterhouse, and Bill Bowerman, college track coach, each investing $500 to start. The company, initially called Blue Ribbon Sports, changed its name to Nike in 1971 and adopted the "Swoosh" logo-recognizable around the world-originally designed by a college student for $35. Nike became highly successful in designing and marketing mass-appealing products such as the Air Jordan, the best-selling athletic shoe of all time. Nike has no production facilities in the United States. Rather, the company manu- factures athletic shoes and garments in such Asian countries as China, Indonesia, and Vietnam using subcontractors, and sells the products in the U.S. and interna- tional markets. In each of those Asian countries where Nike has production facili- ties, the rates of unemployment and under-employment are quite high. The wage rate is very low in those countries by U.S. standards-the hourly wage rate in the manufacturing sector is less than $1 in each of those countries, compared with about $20 in the United States. In addition, workers in those countries often operate in poor and unhealthy environments and their rights are not particularly well protected. Understandably, host countries are eager to attract foreign investments like Nike's to develop their economies and raise the living standards of their citizens. Recently, however, Nike came under worldwide criticism for its practice of hiring workers for such a low rate of pay-"next to nothing" in the words of critics-and condoning poor working conditions in host countries. Initially, Nike denied the sweatshop charges and lashed out at critics. But later, the company began monitoring the labor practices at its overseas factories and grading the factories in order to improve labor standards. Nike also agreed to random factory inspections by disinterested parties.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Industry Specific Activities
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q…
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305080577
Author:
Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub