preview

Differences Between New England And The Chesapeake Bay Colonies Dbq

Decent Essays

New England and the Chesapeake Bay region had evolved into two different sectors due to clashing roles politically, economically, and socially due to the fact that one found bliss in wealth and gold and the other glorified god in all aspects of their lives. The Chesapeake Bay province embodied a legislative assembly while the New England colonies were founded based on religion and were more democratic. Land in New England was deficient and had manufactured goods unlike the south of them, the Chesapeake had proficient soil and large plantations for agriculture. Socially, one of the regions lacked stability because of indentured servitude. The founding principles greatly influenced how these Englishmen of the same ethnicity had starkly distinct societies. …show more content…

Because they were outside the jurisdiction of the company and concerned that new Pilgrims among them might cause problems, the leaders signed the Mayflower Compact, an agreement establishing a civil government under the sovereignty of King James I and creating the Plymouth Plantation colony. The structure of their society was based on God (Doc. D), which is the primitive reason why the sailed away from England and broke away from the Anglican Church to live by their own faith. Egalitarian customs were of great significance to New England and they were convinced that being unified would strengthen their faith and set an example for other communities. “We shall be that city upon the hill” (Doc. A). Jamestown and the Chesapeake on the other hand were founded solely for the profit of an English joint-stock company. They were uber-capitalistic, and the power was held exclusively by the richest of them all. The colony was almost exclusively male, and they grew cash crops like tobacco to maximize their

Get Access