The Peloponnesian War: Athenian Victory American poet James A. Baldwin once said, "People are trapped in history and history is trapped in them." By this he means that people cannot escape history and that history is ultimately shaped by humans. In addition, history is a continuous cycle of repeated events, but what happens if one of those events never occurred? The ancient Athenians and the ancient Spartans fought for a total of twenty-seven years in the Peloponnesian War. Eventually the Spartans defeated the Athenians, but what if the ancient Spartans had never won the Peloponnesian War? Although Athens's potential win in the Peloponnesian War could offer benefits to Ancient Greece, Sparta's victory in the Peloponnesian War is the best decision …show more content…
In 404 B.C., the Spartans had won the Peloponnesian War by defeating the Athenian naval fleet and by starving the Athenians (Buller). Sparta's victory in war then led to various restrictions in Athenian government. Nevertheless, Athenian ideas of democracy still spread throughout the world, despite the death of Athenian Empire. In addition, Sparta's successful campaign in the Peloponnesian War enabled Athenian philosophy to thrive, ultimately aiding Alexander the Great in his worldwide conquest of territory. On the contrary, however, if Alcibiades had continued his expedition to Syracuse, resulting in the potential Athenian win in the Peloponnesian War, the Athenian Empire could expand its influence by conquering lands once controlled by the Peloponnesian League. Athenian leaders could also use the spoils from the war to beautify Athens (Kagan). Though Greece could grow as an international power, Athenian philosophy would decline due to the "perfect and ideal" environment Athenians are living in. This shift from philosophy could cause Alexander the Great to fail as a militaristic strategist, and it could potentially terminate the great Macedonian Empire. The death of this empire could also destroy Hellenistic culture, potentially sabotaging future empires', such as the Roman Empire, cultural heritage. All in all, the ancient Spartan victory in the Peloponnesian War is the best decision because it preserves Athenian philosophy, Hellenistic art and culture, and Alexander the Great's militaristic and cultural
The Classical Era of Greece, 500 -338 BCE, made way to many different changes in Athenian history. The Athenian government changed from a tyranny to a democracy, and after the Persian war in 499 BCE, Athens’ started to became a military superpower, as well. Due to Themistocles advocating to build a stronger navy, their military power grew, causing Athens’ economy to rise becoming the richest city-states. The Peloponnesian War brought out the importance of politicians and leaders, because now the government is run by the people. This war brought two of the most prominent and influential individuals to lead Athens through the war and shaped Athens’ future. The two leaders are cousins, Pericles and Alcibiades. They have multiple similarities, like their lineage and education, while also utilizing their unique personalities in their leadership skills.
He witnessed the formation of Periclean democracy, including the institution of public pay for the democratic jury-courts. Athens also became the first organized global naval power worldwide. He witnessed the long war ending Athenian greatness. This knowledge is important because it suggests Socrates' spent his youth and early manhood during the divides of Post-war and Pre-war Europe. According to University Press, Inc., this was “The War fought between the two leading city-states in ancient Greece, Athens and Sparta. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.) took place between the Athenian empire and Peloponnesian league lead by the Spartans. The Peloponnesian league was a coalition of the Thebes, Corinth and Sparta. The war was divided into 3 phases: The Archidamian War, The Sicilian war and The Ionian or Decelean War phase. The war commenced on 4 April 431 B.C. when the Thebans launched a surprise attack on Plataea, who was a partner of Athens. The war ended on 25 April 404 B.C. when Athens
Sparta was also a contributor to the defeat of the Persians. They were renowned for their great military strength and discipline on land. This gave fear to everyone who was facing the Spartans. In the battle at Marathon, the Persians had to attack soon, knowing that if they didn?t, the superior Spartan warriors would arrive. This fear forced the Persians to hurry their operations, which was why the cavalry was sent off by ships to attack Athens and allowed the Athenians to win at Marathon. The battle at Thermopylae was also another contribution to the war. The Spartans, along with the other Greeks were able to hold off the Persians, but when the enemy found a secret passage around the mountain, many of the Greeks retreated, except for the
The Peloponnesian War pitted the Athenians against the Spartans. The Peloponnesians’ were an alliance of city-states controlled by Sparta. These two powerful city-states became locked in a struggle for dominance of the eastern Mediterranean area. The roots of the conflict and in particular this expedition is highly complex. As Thucydides says in his history of the war, the underlying cause was Spartan fear of Athens' expansive power. But, the triggering event was Athens' aggressive behavior towards Corinth, an ally of Sparta.
After the conclusion of the Persian Wars (492-479BC) with Athens being the true victor, and before the Peloponnesian War, a period of prosperity covered Athens, and they needed to devise new ways to protect themselves and expand their wealth, and how this would affect their relations with allies.
The Peloponnesian War changed Greece and nothing was the same after the war. Athens was never to be as powerful again. As a result of the war, the Athenian Empire was never the same again because of the change in the balance of power in the Greek world. This greatly alarmed Sparta and its allies. The aggressive policies of Athens did not de-escalate the situation whilst the ambitions of the city-state certainly provoked the Spartans. Increasingly, the Spartans became very nervous about the growing naval and commercial power of Athens.
The Peloponnesian war lasted from 431 to 404 B.C. and was profoundly influenced by two Athenian men, Pericles and Alcibiades. Though Pericles and Alcibiades were related by blood they were quite different. Pericles was a diplomat, he approached matters with a level head and tried to find a solution that did not end in bloodshed. Alcibiades was less stable, he either fought, manipulated, or ran when confronted with a problem. Both men spoke eloquently enough to move almost the entire city of Athens, using their words to bend people to their will. What was different between them was what their will was, one cared about the city and its wellbeing, the other cared about his own wellbeing.
Throughout the Ancient Greek world, there have been many wars and standoffs. However, there has been only one which changed the course of Greek history forever; the Peloponnesian War. Caused by the growing tension between Athens and Sparta, it came and left, leaving only destruction in its wake. The defeat of Athens in the Peloponnesian War caused the downfall of Greece, and the end of the Classical Age.
The Peloponnesian War brought disease, destruction, famine, widespread civil wars, and a huge loss of life. The war was a complete catastrophe for Athens, who never fully regained their empire back. Sparta won the war, but they didn’t become a great city and a new empire was never built. Sparta attempted to lead the Greeks, but soon fell short and new leaders were called forth.
In 431 B.C., even before the Peloponnesian War, Athens’ strength compared to other Greek polises was evident. Athens had islands, a powerful, a well-trained navy, and one, if not the best, general at the time: Pericles. Pericles says in his speech that, “war is inevitable,” but in fact the war was preventable (72). Even with all of the military strengths and assets that Athenians had afforded to them, they chose to be merciful to the Peloponnesians who were in no shape to go to war. They did not have the experience, money, manpower, or means to participate in a lengthy war and Pericles makes the citizens aware of this (70). Pericles is both modest and humble for choosing to point out these facts which in turn helps the Athenians see the potential
behind their walls and did not directly meet the Spartans while they despoiled Attica, it’s is fair to say that the Spartans had gotten into the minds of the Athenians. This simple strategy of attack risked very little but gained so much. In the second year of the war, Athens was struck by a terrible plague. Going to close to Athens exposed the Spartans to contracting the disease. If that happened it is fair to say that the end of Sparta campaign would have been inevitable.
The Peloponnesian war (431–404 BC) was an ancient Greek war fought by Athens against the Peloponnesian led by Sparta. Thucydides famously claims that the war started “because the Spartans were afraid of further growth of Athenian power, seeing as they did have the greater part of Hellas was under the control of Athens”. The two main protagonists from opposing sides Lysander and Alcibiades had the most influential impact on the end of the war.
First of all, it is feasible to say that one of the most important reasons for the Athenian defeat was due to
The Peloponnesian War was the turning point in Athenian hegemony in Ancient Greece. It was fought in 431 B.C. between the Delian League, led by Athens, and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. According to Thucydides, Athens’ imposing hegemonic status and its overwhelming quest for more power made the Peloponnesian War and Athens’s eventual fall from power inevitable. Despite the Athenians having a far more superior navy and being considerably wealthier, they were defeated and made subjects of Sparta. In this paper, I will discuss Thucydides’ and Socrates’ reasons for why
This essay examines the evolution of the Athens strategy from the beginning to the end of The Peloponnesian War (431 to 404 BCE). The Strategy will be evaluated in the context of the relationship of ends, means, and ways by testing the suitability, acceptability, feasibility, and risk.