3. Assume ao =0 and w, w+&, where & are independent, identically distributed shocks that take value +A or -A with equal probability (so E(&) = 0). Suppose at t=0 we get a negative shock &=-A. - What would the optimal co be? What a would we need to make that possible? - Is that compatible with the liquidity constraint?

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter17: Capital And Time
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 17.9P: Precautionary saving and prudence The Query to Example 17.2 asks how uncertainty about the future...
icon
Related questions
Question

question attached

3. Assume a, = 0 and we = w + Et, where &, are independent, identically distributed shocks that
take value +A or -A with equal probability (so E(&,) = 0). Suppose att = 0 we get a negative
shock ɛ, = -A.
%3D
What would the optimal co be?
What a, would we need to make that possible?
Is that compatible with the liquidity constraint?
Transcribed Image Text:3. Assume a, = 0 and we = w + Et, where &, are independent, identically distributed shocks that take value +A or -A with equal probability (so E(&,) = 0). Suppose att = 0 we get a negative shock ɛ, = -A. %3D What would the optimal co be? What a, would we need to make that possible? Is that compatible with the liquidity constraint?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 11 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Inflation and Unemployment
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage