Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Economics
Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Profit Chemical Plant Hiking Lodge Total Action (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 2,000 1,000 Recycling 1,500 1,800 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 – $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $2,000 – $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge per week. Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will v the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant per week. The hiking lodge will make the most economic profit when True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True False

Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Profit Chemical Plant Hiking Lodge Total Action (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 2,000 1,000 Recycling 1,500 1,800 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 – $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $2,000 – $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge per week. Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will v the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant per week. The hiking lodge will make the most economic profit when True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True False

Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics (MindTap Course List)
13th Edition
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Roger A. Arnold
Chapter30: Market Failure: Externalities, Public Goods, And Asymmetric Information
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1WNG
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.
Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Profit Chemical Plant Hiking Lodge Total Action (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 2,000 1,000 Recycling 1,500 1,800 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 – $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $2,000 – $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge per week. Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant per week. The hiking lodge will make the most economic profit when True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True False
Transcribed Image Text:Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Profit Chemical Plant Hiking Lodge Total Action (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 2,000 1,000 Recycling 1,500 1,800 Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 – $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by $2,000 – $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge per week. Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant per week. The hiking lodge will make the most economic profit when True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True False
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Recession
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781337617383
Author:
Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781337617406
Author:
Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS