The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 28, Problem 1RE
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Person DE was serving as the chief financial officer for a company, REC. The company was a distributor of serving electricity in portions of North Dakota. The company REC was taking over a company DGI that was distributing natural gas within North Dakota. DE went on a trip to fishing with his uncle EW. During the trip, DE told his uncle that he has been investing a lot of extra time in company REC as it was taking over the natural gas distributing company, DGI. EW after returning from the trip purchased the stock of $20,000 in company REC. The value of stock rose by 72 percent, which resulted in a profit of $14,400 at the time when EW sold his stock of REC.
To find:The requirement for registration of DG Securities with SEC.
Expert Solution & Answer
Explanation of Solution
The company is required to register the securities with the SEC if the security does not qualify for the exemption mentioned in the Securities Act. Company REC is taking over the company DGI that will result in the transfer of securities of DGI to REC. DGI is not issuing any new security for raising of funds. There is no offer of securities made to the public. Henceforth, the company DGI is not required to register the securities with SEC as no new securities are issued.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Eiffel Towers Ltd, a listed company, was a builder and property developer specialising in projects in Melbourne’s central business district. It has five directors. Giscard (Eiffel Towers Ltd’s managing director) and Henri (the company’s chief finance officer), were the only executive directors on the board. The others, all experienced business people, were non-executive directors and attended the monthly board meetings. Over the past two years, Eiffel Towers Ltd’s financial position had worsened. Apart from Henri, the directors were unaware that Eiffel Towers Ltd’s liabilities vastly exceeded its assets and that it had difficulties paying its subcontractors and suppliers on time. Henri made sure the other directors were kept in the dark about this and did not give them meaningful or accurate financial information. The directors were satisfied with Henri’s false assurances that the company’s finances were satisfactory.
Several months ago at an Eiffel Towers Ltd’s board meeting Giscard…
Companies A and B differ only in their capital structure. A is financed 30% debt and 70% equity: B is financed 10% debt and 90% equity. The debt of both companies is risk-free.
a. Rosencrantz owns 1% of the common stock of A. What other investment package would produce identical cash flow for Rosencrantz?
b. Guildenstern owns 2% of common stock of B. What other investment package would produce identical cash flows for Guildenstern?
Omega, Inc., a publicly held corporation, has assets of $100 million and annual earnings in the range of $13 to $15 million. Omega owns three aluminum plants, which are profitable, and one plastics plant, which is losing $4 million a year. The plastics plant shows no sign of ever becoming profitable because of its very high operating costs, and there is no evidence that the plant and the underlying real estate will increase in value. Omega decides to sell the plastics plant. The only bidder for the plant is Gold, who intends to use the plant for a new purpose, to introduce automation, and to replace all current employees. Would it be ethical for Omega to turn down Gold’s bid and keep the plastics plant operating indefinitely for the purpose of preserving the employees’ jobs? Explain.
Chapter 28 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Explain in details why Directors have a duty of loyalty to the company and must avoid conflicts of interest. Link it to the 2006 company act.arrow_forwardConsidering the following statements true or false. 1.Circumstances whereby the CFA member breaches client confidentiality are acceptable in circumstances directed by the client in writing. 2.Mosaic theory damages the interest of all investors by disrupting the smooth functioning of forward markets and lowering investor confidence. 3.As a philosophical ethical principle, when analysing actions undertaken, it is acceptable that an act can be seen as good or bad regardless of the underlying/relevant circumstances. 4.As part of Standard IV, as a superior, it is not your responsibility to ensure ethical behaviour of your subordinates. 5.Premium investment services should be designed in such a way that, while beneficial to those who are in a position to take advantage of them, they are not unfairly disadvantages to other classes of clients.arrow_forwardSeveral months ago, Amanda Potter became a trustee of Breakthrough, a UK charity that supports educational and cultural initiatives for underprivileged children. Potter was invited to join the board of trustees by the board chairman, a long-time friend. In the time since her appointment, Potter has begun to learn about the activities of the charity; however, there are still aspects of operations and funding about which she is not altogether clear. There is some disagreement between trustees about whether the main area of activity for the charity should be educational or whether it should focus more on cultural activities. The board of trustees has met only twice since her appointment, and Potter now understands that many of the policy decisions are made by the chief executive of the organisation and his small management team. Since her appointment, Potter feels that she has done very little as a trustee. She is also annoyed that she has twice been asked to find individuals or companies…arrow_forward
- Jeremy is considering a corporate recapitalization as a gifting technique and has come to his financial planner for more information. Which of the following statements regarding corporate recapitalization are CORRECT? The stock is recapitalized and divided into nonvoting preferred stock and voting common stock. Jeremy retains control of the corporation through the voting rights associated with his preferred stock. Recapitalization can be used in any corporation. The gift of stock given to the junior family members may qualify for valuation discounts. A) II, III, and IV B) I and III C) II and IV D) I and IIarrow_forwardMayflower Trucking Inc. incorporates and issues 1000 shares of common stock. Shawn owns 600 shares of Mayflower stock. If Mayflower is electing three directors and Shawn is the only shareholder to show up at the meeting: there is a quorum. there is not a quorum. a plurality. there is a proxy.arrow_forward1. Exempt from the registration requirement of the Securities Act of 1933 are offerings of securities a. made to a small number of knowledgeable investors. b. issued by for-profit organizations. c. involving a large dollar amount. d. only for large organizations that are for-profit. 2. Global Investments is a foreign investor. With respect to the operations of a limited liability company in the United States, Global can a.not become a member but can participate. b. become a member and participate.c. not become a member or participate. d. Become a member but cannot otherwise participate. 3. Quorum requirements include _________ a. number of decision-makers that must be present before business can be conducted. b. how often decision-makers must meet each year. c. maximum number of shareholders allowed in for-profit companies. d. all other answer choices 4. Fiduciary duties of the directors and officers include a.duty of care b. duty of loyalty c.…arrow_forward
- Parker and Phillips incorporated P & P Resorts Inc., a closely held Texas corporation. Parker was president and Phillips served as vice president and director for operations. Parker owned 40% of the stock, while Phillips owned 60%. Both men met with CTA, a group of travel agents from California to discuss special deals for booking groups into the resorts. After the first meeting, all contracts with CTA were made by Phillips, who learned that there was a good chance that CTA would award the contract to P&P Resorts. Phillips incorporated Travel Brokers and was its sole owner. Phillips used P& P Resort’s time to work on proposals for Travel Brokers and managed to keep negotiations with CTA a secret from Parker. When Parker discovered Phillip’s actions, he filed suit against him for wrongfully taking a corporate opportunity from P &P Resorts. Phillips claimed that he did not take a corporate opportunity because Travel Brokers did not have the financial ability to…arrow_forwardBriefly explain the liability of:(a) A director of a private limited liability company.(b) A partner of a partnership.(c) A sole trader.(d) A private limited company.arrow_forwardBernard Koch was president of United Corporation, a closely held corporation. Koch, James Trent, and Henry Phillips made up the three-person board of directors. At a meeting of the board, Trent was elected president, replacing Koch. At the same meeting, Trent attempted to have the salary of the president increased. He was unable to obtain board approval of the increase because, although Phillips voted for the increase, Koch voted against it. Trent was disqualified from voting by the corporation’s charter. As a result, the directors, by a two-to-one vote, amended the bylaws to provide for the appointment of an executive committee composed of three reputable businesspersons to pass upon and fix all matters of salary for employees of the corporation. Subsequently, the executive committee, consisting of Jane Jones, James Black, and William Johnson, increased the salary of the president. Will Koch succeed in an appropriate action against the corporation, Trent, and Phillips to enjoin them…arrow_forward
- Muller, a shareholder of SCM, brought an action against SCM over his unsuccessful negotiations to purchase some of SCM’s assets overseas. He then formed a shareholder committee to challenge the position of SCM’s management in that suit. To conduct a proxy battle for management control at the next election of directors, the committee sought to obtain the list of shareholders who would be eligible to vote. At the time, however, no member of the committee had owned stock in SCM for the six-month period required to gain access to such information. Then Lopez, a former SCM executive and a shareholder for more than one year, joined the committee and demanded to be allowed to inspect the minutes of SCM shareholder proceedings and to gain access to the current shareholder list. His stated reason for making the demand was to solicit proxies in support of those the committee had nominated for positions as directors. Lopez brought this action after SCM rejected this demand. Will Lopez succeed?arrow_forwardThe shareholders of Escalante company are suing the external auditors of the company. The shareholders are upset because the management of Escalante company produced overly positive financial statements and used these financial statements to lure new investors. Escalante company is now bankrupt, the managers are facing prison time, and the external auditors are in monetary damages settlement talks with shareholders of Escalante company. What role could the public company accounting oversight board (PCAOB) have played in avoiding this catastrophe?arrow_forwardJames and John are directors of ‘Cakes & Frozen Novelties Company Limited.’ Peter, Paul andDavid are shareholders. The company has been in operation for four years. The company has notmade any profits since its inception but James and John decided to declare dividends from thecompany’s capital reserves. The company has 10 million shares that were not distributed. Jameswent ahead and sold the shares to his wife, who is not currently a member of the company.Peter enquired as to whether or not the company can just purchase the shares issued, as there aremany different types of shares available. Paul noted that this is possible but pointed out thatRedeemable shares have particular features and certain procedures must be followed in order toredeem. He also stated three ways in which the company must finance these redeemable shares.James asked about the effect of the redeemable shares. John was puzzled and asked how acompany can redeem its share capital, especially when there is a…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education