A Report On Car Sharing

As people have difficulties to reaching services and activities without having a car, owning a car has its disadvantages and problems also. The problem’s origin date back to the 1920s. While cities were being planned, overall design was based on car usage, but did not account for growth in that population. Urban sprawl added to increased car usage, which was not taken into account during the design phase, and improper

With a declining or no use of cars can result in the reduction of pollution quite tremendously. They can by reducing the greenhouse effect. As the author reports in the article, “In German Suburb Life Goes On Without Care” by Elisabeth Rosenthal, “Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe… and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.” Therefore, with cars being a leading factor of greenhouse gas emissions, reducing their usage would have a positive effect on the environment. After days of near-record pollution,

Impact: This is import because further, well-maintained roads, coupled with access to public transportation and other driving alternatives, can lower traffic congestion and accident rates which not only save Americans time and money but also save

Ride sharing – a car service with which a person can use a smartphone app to arrange a ride in a usually privately

The article, “Automakers Prepare for an America That’s Over the Whole Car Thing,” by Neal E. Boudette, was published on December 22, 2016 in The New York Times. Boudette informs the reader about how “novel” technologies are creating new alternative ways for people, particularly in urban settings, that commutes to different places. Young Americans consider owning a car unnecessary, or a necessary expense. Carmakers are looking at a future where cars will play a little role, or no role at all, in many people’s daily routines. Thus, many industries are in the process of

This action comes with health implications. According to the Toronto Star, there is medical evidence linking suburban lifestyle to obesity. This is because cars are their primary source of transportation, meaning that people are walking less. Also, not everyone can be dependent on cars. Some people may be too young, too old, or too poor to drive a car. Having everyone drive cars lead to traffic congestion in and out of the city. Highway 401 is one of Canada’s most congested highways. To add on, having more cars on the road has negative environmental impacts as well, as they add more greenhouse gas emissions compared to biking, walking, and using public transit. This problem can be solved by designing and creating more walkable, compact, and mixed use

In recent years, major cities across the globe have developed innovative new methods of transportation that could revolutionize the way humans travel and ultimately replace automobiles throughout the industrialized world. Many supporters of this movement believe restricting the use of cars will have a positive impact on society as a whole. Some people believe that taking away automobiles is preposterous given the gravity of which citizens depend on them; although true, replacing cars would have significant benefits throughout society that would outweigh this consequence and ultimately create a new global social order. Restricting cars in cities and encouraging alternate methods of transportation would reduce humans’ carbon footprint, make cities

The use of cars causes market failure. To achieve an efficient use of resources it would be better if

These kind of negative consequences can lead to positive pro-environmental behavior in regards to raising gas prices, building alternate routes around town, keeping sidewalks clean for individuals to walk on, and putting in bike lanes. By raising gas prices individuals do not travel as much so less traffic congestion and pollution, adding alternate routes around the town can help break up the flow of traffic, and adding bicycle lanes, and keeping sidewalks clean will help encourage individuals who live in town to ride bicycles, and walk. Positive consequences of traffic is that it encourages motorist to re-time their road trip to when the traffic is not as congested, and also by reducing speeds can cause less road accidents.

Some people believe that the benefits of the automobile far outweigh the consequences. These people

“Automobiles have a large impact on the quality of our environment and public health. Automobile use affects virtually every aspect of environmental quality - including noise levels, air quality, water pollution, and urban sprawl. Ninety percent of the environmental impact of automobiles occurs through the operation of the cars: about 10 percent from the production, raw materials and disposal of

3. According to the Grist, an article titled “how bicycling will save the economy (if we let it). Elly Blue says that ditching your car for a bike not only saves you thousands of dollars every year, it boosts local businesses. She says, "It's amazing how much money can stay in your community when it isn't being pumped into the gas tank, big insurance, and the auto market," So basically the less money you spend on your car contributes to the small businesses and restaurants that are thriving in your community that boost the economy.

In consequent, they have limit cash to pay for daily operating costs that get higher every day and they would finally have to go out of the business. Second, there is challenge of finding convenient parking lots for its vehicles especially in densely populated cities such as New York and London. A start-up business may find it difficult to anticipate cost of parking. Moreover, there are different preferences of car in different markets. It is hard for a start-up company to meet every need of the consumers. Finally, the limitation of technology makes it hard for a start-up company to catch up with the big players in the market. It’s probably because of the limited capital and inability to access to such innovation. With advanced technology, the big players can easily operate their businesses and provides much convenience more than a start-up company, which results in a great distance between them to catch up with. Such first mover as Zipcar can avoid uncertainties by creating barrier to entry, avoid lockingin to inappropriate models, and have minimal upfront costs. They focused positioning of the Zipcar brand and clear communication of its value proposition. Moreover, they emphasize on the high quality service and consistent performance. Although Zipcar is not the first car share venture in the U.S., the company had

·         The vehicles that are being sold are expensive so selling such products would have a good impact on the economy.

Being lazy is a great thing because so much time is saved. Time may be saved, but in exchange, the environment gets destroyed instead. Driving a car to work may be faster, but it also destroys the environment so much faster. Biking to the store serves the same purpose and it saves the environment greatly. Cars are a huge contributor to global warming. Cars and trucks combined are responsible for one-fifth of all US emissions. They release about 24 pounds of carbon dioxide and other global warming gases for every gallon of gas used (Union of Concerned Scientists). About five pounds of those gases come from production, extraction, and delivery of gasoline. More than 19 pounds are released per gallon from a car's tailpipe (Union of Concerned Scientists). 1.2 billion cubic yards of polluted air is from manufacture. Painting and coating cars produces 40 million pounds of air releases and 24 million pounds of hazardous waste a year. A car's lifetime produces 1.3 billion cubic yard of polluted air and scatters 40 pounds of worn tire particles, brake debris, and worn road surface into the atmosphere (Bike to Work Day). Pollutants released a year add up to over 12,140 lbs for cars and 17,000 for light trucks. Some of those pollutants are carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides (Bike to Work Day). By choosing to bike or walk instead of drive, the amount of gases and waste contributing to global warming, drops drastically. Choosing to drive instead of taking a greener form of transportation is a great threat to the environment.